Blame view

Documentation/cpu-freq/governors.txt 9.52 KB
1da177e4c   Linus Torvalds   Linux-2.6.12-rc2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
       CPU frequency and voltage scaling code in the Linux(TM) kernel
  
  
  		         L i n u x    C P U F r e q
  
  		      C P U F r e q   G o v e r n o r s
  
  		   - information for users and developers -
  
  
  		    Dominik Brodowski  <linux@brodo.de>
594dd2c98   Nico Golde   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
12
              some additions and corrections by Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de>
1da177e4c   Linus Torvalds   Linux-2.6.12-rc2
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
  
  
  
     Clock scaling allows you to change the clock speed of the CPUs on the
      fly. This is a nice method to save battery power, because the lower
              the clock speed, the less power the CPU consumes.
  
  
  Contents:
  ---------
  1.   What is a CPUFreq Governor?
  
  2.   Governors In the Linux Kernel
  2.1  Performance
  2.2  Powersave
  2.3  Userspace
594dd2c98   Nico Golde   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
29
  2.4  Ondemand
537208c80   Alexander Clouter   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
30
  2.5  Conservative
1da177e4c   Linus Torvalds   Linux-2.6.12-rc2
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
  
  3.   The Governor Interface in the CPUfreq Core
  
  
  
  1. What Is A CPUFreq Governor?
  ==============================
  
  Most cpufreq drivers (in fact, all except one, longrun) or even most
  cpu frequency scaling algorithms only offer the CPU to be set to one
  frequency. In order to offer dynamic frequency scaling, the cpufreq
  core must be able to tell these drivers of a "target frequency". So
  these specific drivers will be transformed to offer a "->target"
  call instead of the existing "->setpolicy" call. For "longrun", all
  stays the same, though.
  
  How to decide what frequency within the CPUfreq policy should be used?
  That's done using "cpufreq governors". Two are already in this patch
  -- they're the already existing "powersave" and "performance" which
  set the frequency statically to the lowest or highest frequency,
  respectively. At least two more such governors will be ready for
  addition in the near future, but likely many more as there are various
  different theories and models about dynamic frequency scaling
  around. Using such a generic interface as cpufreq offers to scaling
  governors, these can be tested extensively, and the best one can be
  selected for each specific use.
  
  Basically, it's the following flow graph:
2fe0ae78c   Matt LaPlante   Fix typos in Docu...
59
  CPU can be set to switch independently	 |	   CPU can only be set
1da177e4c   Linus Torvalds   Linux-2.6.12-rc2
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
        within specific "limits"		 |       to specific frequencies
  
                                   "CPUfreq policy"
  		consists of frequency limits (policy->{min,max})
    		     and CPUfreq governor to be used
  			 /		      \
  			/		       \
  		       /		       the cpufreq governor decides
  		      /			       (dynamically or statically)
  		     /			       what target_freq to set within
  		    /			       the limits of policy->{min,max}
  		   /			            \
  		  /				     \
  	Using the ->setpolicy call,		 Using the ->target call,
  	    the limits and the			  the frequency closest
  	     "policy" is set.			  to target_freq is set.
  						  It is assured that it
  						  is within policy->{min,max}
  
  
  2. Governors In the Linux Kernel
  ================================
  
  2.1 Performance
  ---------------
  
  The CPUfreq governor "performance" sets the CPU statically to the
  highest frequency within the borders of scaling_min_freq and
  scaling_max_freq.
594dd2c98   Nico Golde   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
89
  2.2 Powersave
1da177e4c   Linus Torvalds   Linux-2.6.12-rc2
90
91
92
93
94
  -------------
  
  The CPUfreq governor "powersave" sets the CPU statically to the
  lowest frequency within the borders of scaling_min_freq and
  scaling_max_freq.
594dd2c98   Nico Golde   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
95
  2.3 Userspace
1da177e4c   Linus Torvalds   Linux-2.6.12-rc2
96
97
98
99
100
101
  -------------
  
  The CPUfreq governor "userspace" allows the user, or any userspace
  program running with UID "root", to set the CPU to a specific frequency
  by making a sysfs file "scaling_setspeed" available in the CPU-device
  directory.
594dd2c98   Nico Golde   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
102
103
  2.4 Ondemand
  ------------
a2ffd2751   Matt LaPlante   Fix typos in Docu...
104
  The CPUfreq governor "ondemand" sets the CPU depending on the
594dd2c98   Nico Golde   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
105
  current usage. To do this the CPU must have the capability to
537208c80   Alexander Clouter   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
106
107
108
109
110
111
  switch the frequency very quickly.  There are a number of sysfs file
  accessible parameters:
  
  sampling_rate: measured in uS (10^-6 seconds), this is how often you
  want the kernel to look at the CPU usage and to make decisions on
  what to do about the frequency.  Typically this is set to values of
112124ab0   Thomas Renninger   [CPUFREQ] ondeman...
112
113
  around '10000' or more. It's default value is (cmp. with users-guide.txt):
  transition_latency * 1000
112124ab0   Thomas Renninger   [CPUFREQ] ondeman...
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
  Be aware that transition latency is in ns and sampling_rate is in us, so you
  get the same sysfs value by default.
  Sampling rate should always get adjusted considering the transition latency
  To set the sampling rate 750 times as high as the transition latency
  in the bash (as said, 1000 is default), do:
  echo `$(($(cat cpuinfo_transition_latency) * 750 / 1000)) \
      >ondemand/sampling_rate
537208c80   Alexander Clouter   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
121

e7cbb5b56   Paul Bolle   Doc: cpufreq: Fix...
122
  sampling_rate_min:
4f4d1ad6e   Thomas Renninger   [CPUFREQ] Only se...
123
124
125
126
  The sampling rate is limited by the HW transition latency:
  transition_latency * 100
  Or by kernel restrictions:
  If CONFIG_NO_HZ is set, the limit is 10ms fixed.
bd74b32b7   Paul Bolle   Fix documentation...
127
  If CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set or nohz=off boot parameter is used, the
4f4d1ad6e   Thomas Renninger   [CPUFREQ] Only se...
128
129
130
131
132
133
  limits depend on the CONFIG_HZ option:
  HZ=1000: min=20000us  (20ms)
  HZ=250:  min=80000us  (80ms)
  HZ=100:  min=200000us (200ms)
  The highest value of kernel and HW latency restrictions is shown and
  used as the minimum sampling rate.
d91958815   Matt LaPlante   Documentation cle...
134
  up_threshold: defines what the average CPU usage between the samplings
537208c80   Alexander Clouter   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
135
136
  of 'sampling_rate' needs to be for the kernel to make a decision on
  whether it should increase the frequency.  For example when it is set
292e0041c   Mike Frysinger   [CPUFREQ] fix def...
137
138
  to its default value of '95' it means that between the checking
  intervals the CPU needs to be on average more than 95% in use to then
537208c80   Alexander Clouter   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
139
  decide that the CPU frequency needs to be increased.  
992caacf1   Matt LaPlante   Fix typos in Docu...
140
141
142
  ignore_nice_load: this parameter takes a value of '0' or '1'. When
  set to '0' (its default), all processes are counted towards the
  'cpu utilisation' value.  When set to '1', the processes that are
537208c80   Alexander Clouter   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
143
  run with a 'nice' value will not count (and thus be ignored) in the
992caacf1   Matt LaPlante   Fix typos in Docu...
144
  overall usage calculation.  This is useful if you are running a CPU
537208c80   Alexander Clouter   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
145
146
147
  intensive calculation on your laptop that you do not care how long it
  takes to complete as you can 'nice' it and prevent it from taking part
  in the deciding process of whether to increase your CPU frequency.
5b95364f6   Vishwanath BS   [CPUFREQ] Add doc...
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
  sampling_down_factor: this parameter controls the rate at which the
  kernel makes a decision on when to decrease the frequency while running
  at top speed. When set to 1 (the default) decisions to reevaluate load
  are made at the same interval regardless of current clock speed. But
  when set to greater than 1 (e.g. 100) it acts as a multiplier for the
  scheduling interval for reevaluating load when the CPU is at its top
  speed due to high load. This improves performance by reducing the overhead
  of load evaluation and helping the CPU stay at its top speed when truly
  busy, rather than shifting back and forth in speed. This tunable has no
  effect on behavior at lower speeds/lower CPU loads.
537208c80   Alexander Clouter   [PATCH] cpufreq: ...
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
  
  2.5 Conservative
  ----------------
  
  The CPUfreq governor "conservative", much like the "ondemand"
  governor, sets the CPU depending on the current usage.  It differs in
  behaviour in that it gracefully increases and decreases the CPU speed
  rather than jumping to max speed the moment there is any load on the
  CPU.  This behaviour more suitable in a battery powered environment.
  The governor is tweaked in the same manner as the "ondemand" governor
  through sysfs with the addition of:
  
  freq_step: this describes what percentage steps the cpu freq should be
  increased and decreased smoothly by.  By default the cpu frequency will
  increase in 5% chunks of your maximum cpu frequency.  You can change this
  value to anywhere between 0 and 100 where '0' will effectively lock your
  CPU at a speed regardless of its load whilst '100' will, in theory, make
  it behave identically to the "ondemand" governor.
  
  down_threshold: same as the 'up_threshold' found for the "ondemand"
  governor but for the opposite direction.  For example when set to its
  default value of '20' it means that if the CPU usage needs to be below
  20% between samples to have the frequency decreased.
1da177e4c   Linus Torvalds   Linux-2.6.12-rc2
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
  
  3. The Governor Interface in the CPUfreq Core
  =============================================
  
  A new governor must register itself with the CPUfreq core using
  "cpufreq_register_governor". The struct cpufreq_governor, which has to
  be passed to that function, must contain the following values:
  
  governor->name -	    A unique name for this governor
  governor->governor -	    The governor callback function
  governor->owner	-	    .THIS_MODULE for the governor module (if 
  			    appropriate)
  
  The governor->governor callback is called with the current (or to-be-set)
  cpufreq_policy struct for that CPU, and an unsigned int event. The
  following events are currently defined:
  
  CPUFREQ_GOV_START:   This governor shall start its duty for the CPU
  		     policy->cpu
  CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP:    This governor shall end its duty for the CPU
  		     policy->cpu
  CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS:  The limits for CPU policy->cpu have changed to
  		     policy->min and policy->max.
  
  If you need other "events" externally of your driver, _only_ use the
  cpufreq_governor_l(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int event) call to the
  CPUfreq core to ensure proper locking.
  
  
  The CPUfreq governor may call the CPU processor driver using one of
  these two functions:
  
  int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                                   unsigned int target_freq,
                                   unsigned int relation);
  
  int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                                     unsigned int target_freq,
                                     unsigned int relation);
  
  target_freq must be within policy->min and policy->max, of course.
  What's the difference between these two functions? When your governor
  still is in a direct code path of a call to governor->governor, the
  per-CPU cpufreq lock is still held in the cpufreq core, and there's
  no need to lock it again (in fact, this would cause a deadlock). So
  use __cpufreq_driver_target only in these cases. In all other cases 
  (for example, when there's a "daemonized" function that wakes up 
  every second), use cpufreq_driver_target to lock the cpufreq per-CPU
  lock before the command is passed to the cpufreq processor driver.