Commit 3908fd2ed920af818aa596672da68ba26173ff27

Authored by Zachary Amsden
Committed by Linus Torvalds
1 parent c949d4eb40

[PATCH] softirq: remove BUG_ONs which can incorrectly trigger

It is possible to have tasklets get scheduled before softirqd has had a chance
to spawn on all CPUs.  This is totally harmless; after success during action
CPU_UP_PREPARE, action CPU_ONLINE will be called, which immediately wakes
softirqd on the appropriate CPU to process the already pending tasklets.  So
there is no danger of having a missed wakeup for any tasklets that were
already pending.

In particular, i386 is affected by this during startup, and is visible when
using a very large initrd; during the time it takes for the initrd to be
decompressed, a timer IRQ can come in and schedule RCU callbacks.  It is also
possible that resending of a hardware IRQ via a softirq triggers the same bug.

Because of different timing conditions, this shows up in all emulators and
virtual machines tested, including Xen, VMware, Virtual PC, and Qemu.  It is
also possible to trigger on native hardware with a large enough initrd,
although I don't have a reliable case demonstrating that.

Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Cc: <caglar@pardus.org.tr>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Showing 1 changed file with 0 additions and 2 deletions Side-by-side Diff

... ... @@ -574,8 +574,6 @@
574 574  
575 575 switch (action) {
576 576 case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
577   - BUG_ON(per_cpu(tasklet_vec, hotcpu).list);
578   - BUG_ON(per_cpu(tasklet_hi_vec, hotcpu).list);
579 577 p = kthread_create(ksoftirqd, hcpu, "ksoftirqd/%d", hotcpu);
580 578 if (IS_ERR(p)) {
581 579 printk("ksoftirqd for %i failed\n", hotcpu);