Commit 8dbb8d54fe0bb551d515393fca495508d36af2a1
Exists in
smarc-imx_3.14.28_1.0.0_ga
and in
1 other branch
Merge branch 'acpi-processor'
* acpi-processor: ACPI / processor: Do not request ACPI cpufreq module directly
Showing 3 changed files Side-by-side Diff
drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
| ... | ... | @@ -235,28 +235,6 @@ |
| 235 | 235 | acpi_processor_ppc_status &= ~PPC_REGISTERED; |
| 236 | 236 | } |
| 237 | 237 | |
| 238 | -/* | |
| 239 | - * Do a quick check if the systems looks like it should use ACPI | |
| 240 | - * cpufreq. We look at a _PCT method being available, but don't | |
| 241 | - * do a whole lot of sanity checks. | |
| 242 | - */ | |
| 243 | -void acpi_processor_load_module(struct acpi_processor *pr) | |
| 244 | -{ | |
| 245 | - static int requested; | |
| 246 | - acpi_status status = 0; | |
| 247 | - struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL }; | |
| 248 | - | |
| 249 | - if (!arch_has_acpi_pdc() || requested) | |
| 250 | - return; | |
| 251 | - status = acpi_evaluate_object(pr->handle, "_PCT", NULL, &buffer); | |
| 252 | - if (!ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { | |
| 253 | - printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "Requesting acpi_cpufreq\n"); | |
| 254 | - request_module_nowait("acpi_cpufreq"); | |
| 255 | - requested = 1; | |
| 256 | - } | |
| 257 | - kfree(buffer.pointer); | |
| 258 | -} | |
| 259 | - | |
| 260 | 238 | static int acpi_processor_get_performance_control(struct acpi_processor *pr) |
| 261 | 239 | { |
| 262 | 240 | int result = 0; |
include/acpi/processor.h