Commit d530148ae8bffe1b33f50d1776d185a6e85dc774

Authored by Shaohua Li
Committed by Jan Kara
1 parent d56557af19

dquot: do full inode dirty in allocating space

Alex Shi found a regression when doing ffsb test. The test has several threads,
and each thread creates a small file, write to it and then delete it. ffsb
reports about 20% regression and Alex bisected it to 43d2932d88e4. The test
will call __mark_inode_dirty 3 times. without this commit, we only take
inode_lock one time, while with it, we take the lock 3 times with flags (
I_DIRTY_SYNC,I_DIRTY_PAGES,I_DIRTY). Perf shows the lock contention increased
too much. Below proposed patch fixes it.

fs is allocating blocks, which usually means file writes and the inode
will be dirtied soon. We fully dirty the inode to reduce some inode_lock
contention in several calls of __mark_inode_dirty.

Jan Kara: Added comment.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

Showing 1 changed file with 8 additions and 2 deletions Side-by-side Diff

include/linux/quotaops.h
... ... @@ -274,8 +274,14 @@
274 274 int ret;
275 275  
276 276 ret = dquot_alloc_space_nodirty(inode, nr);
277   - if (!ret)
278   - mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
  277 + if (!ret) {
  278 + /*
  279 + * Mark inode fully dirty. Since we are allocating blocks, inode
  280 + * would become fully dirty soon anyway and it reportedly
  281 + * reduces inode_lock contention.
  282 + */
  283 + mark_inode_dirty(inode);
  284 + }
279 285 return ret;
280 286 }
281 287