29 Jan, 2013
1 commit
-
Tiny RCU has historically omitted RCU CPU stall warnings in order to
reduce memory requirements, however, lack of these warnings caused
Thomas Gleixner some debugging pain recently. Therefore, this commit
adds RCU CPU stall warnings to tiny RCU if RCU_TRACE=y. This keeps
the memory footprint small, while still enabling CPU stall warnings
in kernels built to enable them.Updated to include Josh Triplett's suggested use of RCU_STALL_COMMON
config variable to simplify #if expressions.Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett
24 Oct, 2012
1 commit
-
There have been some embedded applications that would benefit from
use of expedited grace-period primitives. In some ways, this is
similar to synchronize_net() doing either a normal or an expedited
grace period depending on lock state, but with control outside of
the kernel.This commit therefore adds rcu_expedited boot and sysfs parameters
that cause the kernel to substitute expedited primitives for the
normal grace-period primitives.[ paulmck: Add trace/event/rcu.h to kernel/srcu.c to avoid build error.
Get rid of infinite loop through contention path.]Signed-off-by: Antti P Miettinen
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
23 Sep, 2012
1 commit
-
The use of raw_local_irq_save() is unnecessary, given that local_irq_save()
really does disable interrupts. Also, it appears to interfere with lockdep.
Therefore, this commit moves to local_irq_save().Reported-by: Fengguang Wu
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Tested-by: Fengguang Wu
06 Jul, 2012
2 commits
-
The Linux kernel coding style says that single-statement blocks should
omit curly braces unless the other leg of the "if" statement has
multiple statements, in which case the curly braces should be included.
This commit fixes RCU's violations of this rule.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett -
…a' and 'fnh.2012.07.02a' into HEAD
bigrtm: First steps towards getting RCU out of the way of
tens-of-microseconds real-time response on systems compiled
with NR_CPUS=4096. Also cleanups for and increased concurrency
of rcu_barrier() family of primitives.
doctorture: rcutorture and documentation improvements.
fixes: Miscellaneous fixes.
fnh: RCU_FAST_NO_HZ fixes and improvements.
03 Jul, 2012
2 commits
-
The TINY_PREEMPT_RCU() function rcu_preempt_needs_cpu(), which is called
from rcu_needs_cpu(), assumes that it is in a quiescent state with respect
to the CPU. This is no longer the case. This commit therefore updates
rcu_preempt_needs_cpu() to make it aware that it is not running in a
quiescent state.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Tested-by: Heiko Carstens
Tested-by: Pascal Chapperon -
The CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU versions of
__rcu_read_lock() and __rcu_read_unlock() are identical, so this commit
consolidates them into kernel/rcupdate.h.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett
03 May, 2012
1 commit
-
When running preemptible RCU, if a task exits in an RCU read-side
critical section having blocked within that same RCU read-side critical
section, the task must be removed from the list of tasks blocking a
grace period (perhaps the current grace period, perhaps the next grace
period, depending on timing). The exit() path invokes exit_rcu() to
do this cleanup.However, the current implementation of exit_rcu() needlessly does the
cleanup even if the task did not block within the current RCU read-side
critical section, which wastes time and needlessly increases the size
of the state space. Fix this by only doing the cleanup if the current
task is actually on the list of tasks blocking some grace period.While we are at it, consolidate the two identical exit_rcu() functions
into a single function.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Tested-by: Linus TorvaldsConflicts:
kernel/rcupdate.c
22 Feb, 2012
6 commits
-
This is a port of commit #82e78d80 from TREE_PREEMPT_RCU to
TINY_PREEMPT_RCU.This commit uses the fact that current->rcu_boost_mutex is set
any time that the RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BOOSTED flag is set in the
current->rcu_read_unlock_special bitmask. This allows tests of
the bit to be changed to tests of the pointer, which in turn allows
the RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BOOSTED flag to be eliminated.Please note that the check of current->rcu_read_unlock_special need not
change because any time that RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BOOSTED was set, so was
RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED. Therefore, __rcu_read_unlock() can continue
testing current->rcu_read_unlock_special for non-zero, as before.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney -
This is a port to TINY_RCU of Peter Zijlstra's commit #ec433f0c5
The rcu_read_unlock_special() function relies on in_irq() to exclude
scheduler activity from interrupt level. This fails because exit_irq()
can invoke the scheduler after clearing the preempt_count() bits that
in_irq() uses to determine that it is at interrupt level. This situation
can result in failures as follows:$task IRQ SoftIRQ
rcu_read_lock()
/* do stuff */
|= UNLOCK_BLOCKED
rcu_read_unlock()
--t->rcu_read_lock_nestingirq_enter();
/* do stuff, don't use RCU */
irq_exit();
sub_preempt_count(IRQ_EXIT_OFFSET);
invoke_softirq()ttwu();
spin_lock_irq(&pi->lock)
rcu_read_lock();
/* do stuff */
rcu_read_unlock();
rcu_read_unlock_special()
rcu_report_exp_rnp()
ttwu()
spin_lock_irq(&pi->lock) /* deadlock */rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
This can be triggered 'easily' because invoke_softirq() immediately does
a ttwu() of ksoftirqd/# instead of doing the in-place softirq stuff first,
but even without that the above happens.Cure this by also excluding softirqs from the rcu_read_unlock_special()
handler and ensuring the force_irqthreads ksoftirqd/# wakeup is done
from full softirq context.It is also necessary to delay the ->rcu_read_lock_nesting decrement until
after rcu_read_unlock_special(). This delay is handled by the commit
"Protect __rcu_read_unlock() against scheduler-using irq handlers".Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney -
This is a port of commit #b0d3041 from TREE_RCU to TREE_PREEMPT_RCU.
Under some rare but real combinations of configuration parameters, RCU
callbacks are posted during early boot that use kernel facilities that are
not yet initialized. Therefore, when these callbacks are invoked, hard
hangs and crashes ensue. This commit therefore prevents RCU callbacks
from being invoked until after the scheduler is fully up and running,
as in after multiple tasks have been spawned.It might well turn out that a better approach is to identify the specific
RCU callbacks that are causing this problem, but that discussion will
wait until such time as someone really needs an RCU callback to be invoked
(as opposed to merely registered) during early boot.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney -
This is a port of commit #be0e1e21 to TINY_PREEMPT_RCU. This uses
noinline to prevent rcu_read_unlock_special() from being inlined into
__rcu_read_unlock().Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
-
This commit ports commit #10f39bb1b2 (rcu: protect __rcu_read_unlock()
against scheduler-using irq handlers) from TREE_PREEMPT_RCU to
TINY_PREEMPT_RCU. The following is a corresponding port of that
commit message.The addition of RCU read-side critical sections within runqueue and
priority-inheritance critical sections introduced some deadlocks,
for example, involving interrupts from __rcu_read_unlock() where the
interrupt handlers call wake_up(). This situation can cause the
instance of __rcu_read_unlock() invoked from interrupt to do some
of the processing that would otherwise have been carried out by the
task-level instance of __rcu_read_unlock(). When the interrupt-level
instance of __rcu_read_unlock() is called with a scheduler lock held from
interrupt-entry/exit situations where in_irq() returns false, deadlock can
result. Of course, in a UP kernel, there are not really any deadlocks,
but the upper-level critical section can still be be fatally confused
by the lower-level critical section changing things out from under it.This commit resolves these deadlocks by using negative values of the
per-task ->rcu_read_lock_nesting counter to indicate that an instance of
__rcu_read_unlock() is in flight, which in turn prevents instances from
interrupt handlers from doing any special processing. Note that nested
rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pairs are still permitted, but they will
never see ->rcu_read_lock_nesting go to zero, and will therefore never
invoke rcu_read_unlock_special(), thus preventing them from seeing the
RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED bit should it be set in ->rcu_read_unlock_special.
This patch also adds a check for ->rcu_read_unlock_special being negative
in rcu_check_callbacks(), thus preventing the RCU_READ_UNLOCK_NEED_QS
bit from being set should a scheduling-clock interrupt occur while
__rcu_read_unlock() is exiting from an outermost RCU read-side critical
section.Of course, __rcu_read_unlock() can be preempted during the time that
->rcu_read_lock_nesting is negative. This could result in the setting
of the RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED bit after __rcu_read_unlock() checks it,
and would also result it this task being queued on the corresponding
rcu_node structure's blkd_tasks list. Therefore, some later RCU read-side
critical section would enter rcu_read_unlock_special() to clean up --
which could result in deadlock (OK, OK, fatal confusion) if that RCU
read-side critical section happened to be in the scheduler where the
runqueue or priority-inheritance locks were held.To prevent the possibility of fatal confusion that might result from
preemption during the time that ->rcu_read_lock_nesting is negative,
this commit also makes rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() check for
negative ->rcu_read_lock_nesting, thus refraining from queuing the task
(and from setting RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED) if we are already exiting
from the outermost RCU read-side critical section (in other words,
we really are no longer actually in that RCU read-side critical
section). In addition, rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() invokes
rcu_read_unlock_special() to carry out the cleanup in this case, which
clears out the ->rcu_read_unlock_special bits and dequeues the task
(if necessary), in turn avoiding needless delay of the current RCU grace
period and needless RCU priority boosting.It is still illegal to call rcu_read_unlock() while holding a scheduler
lock if the prior RCU read-side critical section has ever had both
preemption and irqs enabled. However, the common use case is legal,
namely where then entire RCU read-side critical section executes with
irqs disabled, for example, when the scheduler lock is held across the
entire lifetime of the RCU read-side critical section.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney -
It is illegal to have a grace period within a same-flavor RCU read-side
critical section, so this commit adds lockdep-RCU checks to splat when
such abuse is encountered. This commit does not detect more elaborate
RCU deadlock situations. These situations might be a job for lockdep
enhancements.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
12 Dec, 2011
2 commits
-
Both TINY_RCU's and TREE_RCU's implementations of rcu_boost() access
the ->boost_tasks and ->exp_tasks fields without preventing concurrent
changes to these fields. This commit therefore applies ACCESS_ONCE in
order to prevent compiler mischief.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney -
The current rcu_batch_end event trace records only the name of the RCU
flavor and the total number of callbacks that remain queued on the
current CPU. This is insufficient for testing and tuning the new
dyntick-idle RCU_FAST_NO_HZ code, so this commit adds idle state along
with whether or not any of the callbacks that were ready to invoke
at the beginning of rcu_do_batch() are still queued.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
31 Oct, 2011
1 commit
-
The file rcutiny.c does not need moduleparam.h header, as
there are no modparams in this file.However rcutiny_plugin.h does define a module_init() and
a module_exit() and it uses the various MODULE_ macros, so
it really does need module.h included.Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
29 Sep, 2011
3 commits
-
This patch #ifdefs TINY_RCU kthreads out of the kernel unless RCU_BOOST=y,
thus eliminating context-switch overhead if RCU priority boosting has
not been configured.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney -
In order to allow event tracing to distinguish between flavors of
RCU, we need those names in the relevant RCU data structures. TINY_RCU
has avoided them for memory-footprint reasons, so add them only if
CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=y.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney -
Pull the code that waits for an RCU grace period into a single function,
which is then called by synchronize_rcu() and friends in the case of
TREE_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, and from rcu_barrier() and friends in
the case of TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
06 May, 2011
3 commits
-
This applies a trick from TREE_RCU boosting to TINY_RCU, eliminating
code and adding comments. The key point is that it is possible for
the booster thread itself to work out whether there is a normal or
expedited boost required based solely on local information. There
is therefore no need for boost initiation to know or care what type
of boosting is required. In addition, when boosting is complete for
a given grace period, then by definition there cannot be any more
boosting for that grace period. This allows eliminating yet more
state and statistics.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett -
The ->boosted_this_gp field is a holdover from an earlier design that
was to carry out multiple boost operations in parallel. It is not required
by the current design, which boosts one task at a time.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney -
Extraneous semicolon, bad comment, and fold INIT_LIST_HEAD() into
list_del() to get list_del_init().Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett
05 Mar, 2011
1 commit
-
Using __rcu_read_lock() in place of rcu_read_lock() leaves any debug
state as it really should be, namely with the lock still held.Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
30 Nov, 2010
3 commits
-
RCU priority boosting's tracing did not distinguish between ongoing
boosting and completion of boosting. This commit therefore adds this
capability.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney -
Add tracing for the tiny RCU implementations, including statistics on
boosting in the case of TINY_PREEMPT_RCU and RCU_BOOST.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney -
Add priority boosting, but only for TINY_PREEMPT_RCU. This is enabled
by the default-off RCU_BOOST kernel parameter. The priority to which to
boost preempted RCU readers is controlled by the RCU_BOOST_PRIO kernel
parameter (defaulting to real-time priority 1) and the time to wait
before boosting the readers blocking a given grace period is controlled
by the RCU_BOOST_DELAY kernel parameter (defaulting to 500 milliseconds).Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
18 Nov, 2010
1 commit
-
If RCU priority boosting is to be meaningful, callback invocation must
be boosted in addition to preempted RCU readers. Otherwise, in presence
of CPU real-time threads, the grace period ends, but the callbacks don't
get invoked. If the callbacks don't get invoked, the associated memory
doesn't get freed, so the system is still subject to OOM.But it is not reasonable to priority-boost RCU_SOFTIRQ, so this commit
moves the callback invocations to a kthread, which can be boosted easily.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
28 Aug, 2010
1 commit
-
This commit tightens up checks in rcu_preempt_check_callbacks() to avoid
unnecessary special handling at rcu_read_unlock() time.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
21 Aug, 2010
1 commit
-
Combine the duplicate definitions of ULONG_CMP_GE(), ULONG_CMP_LT(),
and rcu_preempt_depth() into include/linux/rcupdate.h.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
20 Aug, 2010
1 commit
-
Implement a small-memory-footprint uniprocessor-only implementation of
preemptible RCU. This implementation uses but a single blocked-tasks
list rather than the combinatorial number used per leaf rcu_node by
TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, which reduces memory consumption and greatly simplifies
processing. This version also takes advantage of uniprocessor execution
to accelerate grace periods in the case where there are no readers.The general design is otherwise broadly similar to that of TREE_PREEMPT_RCU.
This implementation is a step towards having RCU implementation driven
off of the SMP and PREEMPT kernel configuration variables, which can
happen once this implementation has accumulated sufficient experience.Removed ACCESS_ONCE() from __rcu_read_unlock() and added barrier() as
suggested by Steve Rostedt in order to avoid the compiler-reordering
issue noted by Mathieu Desnoyers (http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/16/183).As can be seen below, CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU represents almost 5Kbyte
savings compared to CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU. Of course, for non-real-time
workloads, CONFIG_TINY_RCU is even better.CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
text data bss dec filename
13 0 0 13 kernel/rcupdate.o
6170 825 28 7023 kernel/rcutree.o
----
7026 TotalCONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
text data bss dec filename
13 0 0 13 kernel/rcupdate.o
2081 81 8 2170 kernel/rcutiny.o
----
2183 TotalCONFIG_TINY_RCU (non-preemptible)
text data bss dec filename
13 0 0 13 kernel/rcupdate.o
719 25 0 744 kernel/rcutiny.o
---
757 TotalRequested-by: Loïc Minier
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
11 May, 2010
1 commit
-
TINY_RCU does not need rcu_scheduler_active unless CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC.
So conditionally compile rcu_scheduler_active in order to slim down
rcutiny a bit more. Also gets rid of an EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL, which is
responsible for most of the slimming.Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney