17 Oct, 2013
1 commit
-
This leak was added by commit 1d3d4437eae1 ("vmscan: per-node deferred
work").unreferenced object 0xffff88006ada3bd0 (size 8):
comm "criu", pid 14781, jiffies 4295238251 (age 105.641s)
hex dump (first 8 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
backtrace:
[] kmemleak_alloc+0x5e/0xc0
[] __kmalloc+0x247/0x310
[] register_shrinker+0x3c/0xa0
[] sget+0x5ab/0x670
[] proc_mount+0x54/0x170
[] mount_fs+0x43/0x1b0
[] vfs_kern_mount+0x72/0x110
[] kern_mount_data+0x19/0x30
[] pid_ns_prepare_proc+0x20/0x40
[] alloc_pid+0x466/0x4a0
[] copy_process+0xc6a/0x1860
[] do_fork+0x8b/0x370
[] SyS_clone+0x16/0x20
[] stub_clone+0x69/0x90
[] 0xffffffffffffffffSigned-off-by: Andrew Vagin
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Glauber Costa
Cc: Chuck Lever
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
01 Oct, 2013
1 commit
-
Isolated balloon pages can wrongly end up in LRU lists when
migrate_pages() finishes its round without draining all the isolated
page list.The same issue can happen when reclaim_clean_pages_from_list() tries to
reclaim pages from an isolated page list, before migration, in the CMA
path. Such balloon page leak opens a race window against LRU lists
shrinkers that leads us to the following kernel panic:BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000028
IP: [] shrink_page_list+0x24e/0x897
PGD 3cda2067 PUD 3d713067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU: 0 PID: 340 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc1-22626-g4367597 #87
Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
RIP: shrink_page_list+0x24e/0x897
RSP: 0000:ffff88003da499b8 EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88003e82bd60 RCX: 00000000000657d5
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000031f RDI: ffff88003e82bd40
RBP: ffff88003da49ab0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000081121a45
R10: ffffffff81121a45 R11: ffff88003c4a9a28 R12: ffff88003e82bd40
R13: ffff88003da0e800 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88003da49d58
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88003fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000067d9000 CR3: 000000003ace5000 CR4: 00000000000407b0
Call Trace:
shrink_inactive_list+0x240/0x3de
shrink_lruvec+0x3e0/0x566
__shrink_zone+0x94/0x178
shrink_zone+0x3a/0x82
balance_pgdat+0x32a/0x4c2
kswapd+0x2f0/0x372
kthread+0xa2/0xaa
ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
Code: 80 7d 8f 01 48 83 95 68 ff ff ff 00 4c 89 e7 e8 5a 7b 00 00 48 85 c0 49 89 c5 75 08 80 7d 8f 00 74 3e eb 31 48 8b 80 18 01 00 00 8b 74 0d 48 8b 78 30 be 02 00 00 00 ff d2 eb
RIP [] shrink_page_list+0x24e/0x897
RSP
CR2: 0000000000000028
---[ end trace 703d2451af6ffbfd ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exceptionThis patch fixes the issue, by assuring the proper tests are made at
putback_movable_pages() & reclaim_clean_pages_from_list() to avoid
isolated balloon pages being wrongly reinserted in LRU lists.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: clarify awkward comment text]
Signed-off-by: Rafael Aquini
Reported-by: Luiz Capitulino
Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
25 Sep, 2013
5 commits
-
Revert commit 3b38722efd9f ("memcg, vmscan: integrate soft reclaim
tighter with zone shrinking code")I merged this prematurely - Michal and Johannes still disagree about the
overall design direction and the future remains unclear.Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Revert commit a5b7c87f9207 ("vmscan, memcg: do softlimit reclaim also
for targeted reclaim")I merged this prematurely - Michal and Johannes still disagree about the
overall design direction and the future remains unclear.Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Revert commit de57780dc659 ("memcg: enhance memcg iterator to support
predicates")I merged this prematurely - Michal and Johannes still disagree about the
overall design direction and the future remains unclear.Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Revert commit e839b6a1c8d0 ("memcg, vmscan: do not attempt soft limit
reclaim if it would not scan anything")I merged this prematurely - Michal and Johannes still disagree about the
overall design direction and the future remains unclear.Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Revert commit e975de998b96 ("memcg, vmscan: do not fall into reclaim-all
pass too quickly")I merged this prematurely - Michal and Johannes still disagree about the
overall design direction and the future remains unclear.Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
13 Sep, 2013
8 commits
-
Merge more patches from Andrew Morton:
"The rest of MM. Plus one misc cleanup"* emailed patches from Andrew Morton : (35 commits)
mm/Kconfig: add MMU dependency for MIGRATION.
kernel: replace strict_strto*() with kstrto*()
mm, thp: count thp_fault_fallback anytime thp fault fails
thp: consolidate code between handle_mm_fault() and do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page()
thp: do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() cleanup
thp: move maybe_pmd_mkwrite() out of mk_huge_pmd()
mm: cleanup add_to_page_cache_locked()
thp: account anon transparent huge pages into NR_ANON_PAGES
truncate: drop 'oldsize' truncate_pagecache() parameter
mm: make lru_add_drain_all() selective
memcg: document cgroup dirty/writeback memory statistics
memcg: add per cgroup writeback pages accounting
memcg: check for proper lock held in mem_cgroup_update_page_stat
memcg: remove MEMCG_NR_FILE_MAPPED
memcg: reduce function dereference
memcg: avoid overflow caused by PAGE_ALIGN
memcg: rename RESOURCE_MAX to RES_COUNTER_MAX
memcg: correct RESOURCE_MAX to ULLONG_MAX
mm: memcg: do not trap chargers with full callstack on OOM
mm: memcg: rework and document OOM waiting and wakeup
... -
Clean up some mess made by the "Soft limit rework" series, and a few other
things.Cc: Michal Hocko
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
shrink_zone starts with soft reclaim pass first and then falls back to
regular reclaim if nothing has been scanned. This behavior is natural
but there is a catch. Memcg iterators, when used with the reclaim
cookie, are designed to help to prevent from over reclaim by
interleaving reclaimers (per node-zone-priority) so the tree walk might
miss many (even all) nodes in the hierarchy e.g. when there are direct
reclaimers racing with each other or with kswapd in the global case or
multiple allocators reaching the limit for the target reclaim case. To
make it even more complicated, targeted reclaim doesn't do the whole
tree walk because it stops reclaiming once it reclaims sufficient pages.
As a result groups over the limit might be missed, thus nothing is
scanned, and reclaim would fall back to the reclaim all mode.This patch checks for the incomplete tree walk in shrink_zone. If no
group has been visited and the hierarchy is soft reclaimable then we
must have missed some groups, in which case the __shrink_zone is called
again. This doesn't guarantee there will be some progress of course
because the current reclaimer might be still racing with others but it
would at least give a chance to start the walk without a big risk of
reclaim latencies.Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Balbir Singh
Cc: Glauber Costa
Cc: Greg Thelen
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Michel Lespinasse
Cc: Tejun Heo
Cc: Ying Han
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
mem_cgroup_should_soft_reclaim controls whether soft reclaim pass is
done and it always says yes currently. Memcg iterators are clever to
skip nodes that are not soft reclaimable quite efficiently but
mem_cgroup_should_soft_reclaim can be more clever and do not start the
soft reclaim pass at all if it knows that nothing would be scanned
anyway.In order to do that, simply reuse mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible for
the target group of the reclaim and allow the pass only if the whole
subtree wouldn't be skipped.Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Balbir Singh
Cc: Glauber Costa
Cc: Greg Thelen
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Michel Lespinasse
Cc: Tejun Heo
Cc: Ying Han
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The caller of the iterator might know that some nodes or even subtrees
should be skipped but there is no way to tell iterators about that so the
only choice left is to let iterators to visit each node and do the
selection outside of the iterating code. This, however, doesn't scale
well with hierarchies with many groups where only few groups are
interesting.This patch adds mem_cgroup_iter_cond variant of the iterator with a
callback which gets called for every visited node. There are three
possible ways how the callback can influence the walk. Either the node is
visited, it is skipped but the tree walk continues down the tree or the
whole subtree of the current group is skipped.[hughd@google.com: fix memcg-less page reclaim]
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Balbir Singh
Cc: Glauber Costa
Cc: Greg Thelen
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Michel Lespinasse
Cc: Tejun Heo
Cc: Ying Han
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Soft reclaim has been done only for the global reclaim (both background
and direct). Since "memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone
shrinking code" there is no reason for this limitation anymore as the soft
limit reclaim doesn't use any special code paths and it is a part of the
zone shrinking code which is used by both global and targeted reclaims.From the semantic point of view it is natural to consider soft limit
before touching all groups in the hierarchy tree which is touching the
hard limit because soft limit tells us where to push back when there is a
memory pressure. It is not important whether the pressure comes from the
limit or imbalanced zones.This patch simply enables soft reclaim unconditionally in
mem_cgroup_should_soft_reclaim so it is enabled for both global and
targeted reclaim paths. mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible needs to learn
about the root of the reclaim to know where to stop checking soft limit
state of parents up the hierarchy. Say we haveA (over soft limit)
\
B (below s.l., hit the hard limit)
/ \
C D (below s.l.)B is the source of the outside memory pressure now for D but we shouldn't
soft reclaim it because it is behaving well under B subtree and we can
still reclaim from C (pressumably it is over the limit).
mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible should therefore stop climbing up the
hierarchy at B (root of the memory pressure).Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Reviewed-by: Glauber Costa
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo
Cc: Balbir Singh
Cc: Greg Thelen
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Michel Lespinasse
Cc: Ying Han
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This patchset is sitting out of tree for quite some time without any
objections. I would be really happy if it made it into 3.12. I do not
want to push it too hard but I think this work is basically ready and
waiting more doesn't help.The basic idea is quite simple. Pull soft reclaim into shrink_zone in the
first step and get rid of the previous soft reclaim infrastructure.
shrink_zone is done in two passes now. First it tries to do the soft
limit reclaim and it falls back to reclaim-all mode if no group is over
the limit or no pages have been scanned. The second pass happens at the
same priority so the only time we waste is the memcg tree walk which has
been updated in the third step to have only negligible overhead.As a bonus we will get rid of a _lot_ of code by this and soft reclaim
will not stand out like before when it wasn't integrated into the zone
shrinking code and it reclaimed at priority 0 (the testing results show
that some workloads suffers from such an aggressive reclaim). The clean
up is in a separate patch because I felt it would be easier to review that
way.The second step is soft limit reclaim integration into targeted reclaim.
It should be rather straight forward. Soft limit has been used only for
the global reclaim so far but it makes sense for any kind of pressure
coming from up-the-hierarchy, including targeted reclaim.The third step (patches 4-8) addresses the tree walk overhead by enhancing
memcg iterators to enable skipping whole subtrees and tracking number of
over soft limit children at each level of the hierarchy. This information
is updated same way the old soft limit tree was updated (from
memcg_check_events) so we shouldn't see an additional overhead. In fact
mem_cgroup_update_soft_limit is much simpler than tree manipulation done
previously.__shrink_zone uses mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible as a predicate for
mem_cgroup_iter so the decision whether a particular group should be
visited is done at the iterator level which allows us to decide to skip
the whole subtree as well (if there is no child in excess). This reduces
the tree walk overhead considerably.* TEST 1
========My primary test case was a parallel kernel build with 2 groups (make is
running with -j8 with a distribution .config in a separate cgroup without
any hard limit) on a 32 CPU machine booted with 1GB memory and both builds
run taskset to Node 0 cpus.I was mostly interested in 2 setups. Default - no soft limit set and -
and 0 soft limit set to both groups. The first one should tell us whether
the rework regresses the default behavior while the second one should show
us improvements in an extreme case where both workloads are always over
the soft limit./usr/bin/time -v has been used to collect the statistics and each
configuration had 3 runs after fresh boot without any other load on the
system.base is mmotm-2013-07-18-16-40
rework all 8 patches applied on top of base* No-limit
User
no-limit/base: min: 651.92 max: 672.65 avg: 664.33 std: 8.01 runs: 6
no-limit/rework: min: 657.34 [100.8%] max: 668.39 [99.4%] avg: 663.13 [99.8%] std: 3.61 runs: 6
System
no-limit/base: min: 69.33 max: 71.39 avg: 70.32 std: 0.79 runs: 6
no-limit/rework: min: 69.12 [99.7%] max: 71.05 [99.5%] avg: 70.04 [99.6%] std: 0.59 runs: 6
Elapsed
no-limit/base: min: 398.27 max: 422.36 avg: 408.85 std: 7.74 runs: 6
no-limit/rework: min: 386.36 [97.0%] max: 438.40 [103.8%] avg: 416.34 [101.8%] std: 18.85 runs: 6The results are within noise. Elapsed time has a bigger variance but the
average looks good.* 0-limit
User
0-limit/base: min: 573.76 max: 605.63 avg: 585.73 std: 12.21 runs: 6
0-limit/rework: min: 645.77 [112.6%] max: 666.25 [110.0%] avg: 656.97 [112.2%] std: 7.77 runs: 6
System
0-limit/base: min: 69.57 max: 71.13 avg: 70.29 std: 0.54 runs: 6
0-limit/rework: min: 68.68 [98.7%] max: 71.40 [100.4%] avg: 69.91 [99.5%] std: 0.87 runs: 6
Elapsed
0-limit/base: min: 1306.14 max: 1550.17 avg: 1430.35 std: 90.86 runs: 6
0-limit/rework: min: 404.06 [30.9%] max: 465.94 [30.1%] avg: 434.81 [30.4%] std: 22.68 runs: 6The improvement is really huge here (even bigger than with my previous
testing and I suspect that this highly depends on the storage). Page
fault statistics tell us at least part of the story:Minor
0-limit/base: min: 37180461.00 max: 37319986.00 avg: 37247470.00 std: 54772.71 runs: 6
0-limit/rework: min: 36751685.00 [98.8%] max: 36805379.00 [98.6%] avg: 36774506.33 [98.7%] std: 17109.03 runs: 6
Major
0-limit/base: min: 170604.00 max: 221141.00 avg: 196081.83 std: 18217.01 runs: 6
0-limit/rework: min: 2864.00 [1.7%] max: 10029.00 [4.5%] avg: 5627.33 [2.9%] std: 2252.71 runs: 6Same as with my previous testing Minor faults are more or less within
noise but Major fault count is way bellow the base kernel.While this looks as a nice win it is fair to say that 0-limit
configuration is quite artificial. So I was playing with 0-no-limit
loads as well.* TEST 2
========The following results are from 2 groups configuration on a 16GB machine
(single NUMA node).- A running stream IO (dd if=/dev/zero of=local.file bs=1024) with
2*TotalMem with 0 soft limit.
- B running a mem_eater which consumes TotalMem-1G without any limit. The
mem_eater consumes the memory in 100 chunks with 1s nap after each
mmap+poppulate so that both loads have chance to fight for the memory.The expected result is that B shouldn't be reclaimed and A shouldn't see
a big dropdown in elapsed time.User
base: min: 2.68 max: 2.89 avg: 2.76 std: 0.09 runs: 3
rework: min: 3.27 [122.0%] max: 3.74 [129.4%] avg: 3.44 [124.6%] std: 0.21 runs: 3
System
base: min: 86.26 max: 88.29 avg: 87.28 std: 0.83 runs: 3
rework: min: 81.05 [94.0%] max: 84.96 [96.2%] avg: 83.14 [95.3%] std: 1.61 runs: 3
Elapsed
base: min: 317.28 max: 332.39 avg: 325.84 std: 6.33 runs: 3
rework: min: 281.53 [88.7%] max: 298.16 [89.7%] avg: 290.99 [89.3%] std: 6.98 runs: 3System time improved slightly as well as Elapsed. My previous testing
has shown worse numbers but this again seem to depend on the storage
speed.My theory is that the writeback doesn't catch up and prio-0 soft reclaim
falls into wait on writeback page too often in the base kernel. The
patched kernel doesn't do that because the soft reclaim is done from the
kswapd/direct reclaim context. This can be seen on the following graph
nicely. The A's group usage_in_bytes regurarly drops really low very often.All 3 runs
http://labs.suse.cz/mhocko/soft_limit_rework/stream_io-vs-mem_eater/stream.png
resp. a detail of the single run
http://labs.suse.cz/mhocko/soft_limit_rework/stream_io-vs-mem_eater/stream-one-run.pngmem_eater seems to be doing better as well. It gets to the full
allocation size faster as can be seen on the following graph:
http://labs.suse.cz/mhocko/soft_limit_rework/stream_io-vs-mem_eater/mem_eater-one-run.png/proc/meminfo collected during the test also shows that rework kernel
hasn't swapped that much (well almost not at all):
base: max: 123900 K avg: 56388.29 K
rework: max: 300 K avg: 128.68 Kkswapd and direct reclaim statistics are of no use unfortunatelly because
soft reclaim is not accounted properly as the counters are hidden by
global_reclaim() checks in the base kernel.* TEST 3
========Another test was the same configuration as TEST2 except the stream IO was
replaced by a single kbuild (16 parallel jobs bound to Node0 cpus same as
in TEST1) and mem_eater allocated TotalMem-200M so kbuild had only 200MB
left.Kbuild did better with the rework kernel here as well:
User
base: min: 860.28 max: 872.86 avg: 868.03 std: 5.54 runs: 3
rework: min: 880.81 [102.4%] max: 887.45 [101.7%] avg: 883.56 [101.8%] std: 2.83 runs: 3
System
base: min: 84.35 max: 85.06 avg: 84.79 std: 0.31 runs: 3
rework: min: 85.62 [101.5%] max: 86.09 [101.2%] avg: 85.79 [101.2%] std: 0.21 runs: 3
Elapsed
base: min: 135.36 max: 243.30 avg: 182.47 std: 45.12 runs: 3
rework: min: 110.46 [81.6%] max: 116.20 [47.8%] avg: 114.15 [62.6%] std: 2.61 runs: 3
Minor
base: min: 36635476.00 max: 36673365.00 avg: 36654812.00 std: 15478.03 runs: 3
rework: min: 36639301.00 [100.0%] max: 36695541.00 [100.1%] avg: 36665511.00 [100.0%] std: 23118.23 runs: 3
Major
base: min: 14708.00 max: 53328.00 avg: 31379.00 std: 16202.24 runs: 3
rework: min: 302.00 [2.1%] max: 414.00 [0.8%] avg: 366.33 [1.2%] std: 47.22 runs: 3Again we can see a significant improvement in Elapsed (it also seems to
be more stable), there is a huge dropdown for the Major page faults and
much more swapping:
base: max: 583736 K avg: 112547.43 K
rework: max: 4012 K avg: 124.36 KGraphs from all three runs show the variability of the kbuild quite
nicely. It even seems that it took longer after every run with the base
kernel which would be quite surprising as the source tree for the build is
removed and caches are dropped after each run so the build operates on a
freshly extracted sources everytime.
http://labs.suse.cz/mhocko/soft_limit_rework/stream_io-vs-mem_eater/kbuild-mem_eater.pngMy other testing shows that this is just a matter of timing and other runs
behave differently the std for Elapsed time is similar ~50. Example of
other three runs:
http://labs.suse.cz/mhocko/soft_limit_rework/stream_io-vs-mem_eater/kbuild-mem_eater2.pngSo to wrap this up. The series is still doing good and improves the soft
limit.The testing results for bunch of cgroups with both stream IO and kbuild
loads can be found in "memcg: track children in soft limit excess to
improve soft limit".This patch:
Memcg soft reclaim has been traditionally triggered from the global
reclaim paths before calling shrink_zone. mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim
then picked up a group which exceeds the soft limit the most and reclaimed
it with 0 priority to reclaim at least SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages.The infrastructure requires per-node-zone trees which hold over-limit
groups and keep them up-to-date (via memcg_check_events) which is not cost
free. Although this overhead hasn't turned out to be a bottle neck the
implementation is suboptimal because mem_cgroup_update_tree has no idea
which zones consumed memory over the limit so we could easily end up
having a group on a node-zone tree having only few pages from that
node-zone.This patch doesn't try to fix node-zone trees management because it seems
that integrating soft reclaim into zone shrinking sounds much easier and
more appropriate for several reasons. First of all 0 priority reclaim was
a crude hack which might lead to big stalls if the group's LRUs are big
and hard to reclaim (e.g. a lot of dirty/writeback pages). Soft reclaim
should be applicable also to the targeted reclaim which is awkward right
now without additional hacks. Last but not least the whole infrastructure
eats quite some code.After this patch shrink_zone is done in 2 passes. First it tries to do
the soft reclaim if appropriate (only for global reclaim for now to keep
compatible with the original state) and fall back to ignoring soft limit
if no group is eligible to soft reclaim or nothing has been scanned during
the first pass. Only groups which are over their soft limit or any of
their parents up the hierarchy is over the limit are considered eligible
during the first pass.Soft limit tree which is not necessary anymore will be removed in the
follow up patch to make this patch smaller and easier to review.Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Reviewed-by: Glauber Costa
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Ying Han
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Michel Lespinasse
Cc: Greg Thelen
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Balbir Singh
Cc: Glauber Costa
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Pull vfs pile 4 from Al Viro:
"list_lru pile, mostly"This came out of Andrew's pile, Al ended up doing the merge work so that
Andrew didn't have to.Additionally, a few fixes.
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: (42 commits)
super: fix for destroy lrus
list_lru: dynamically adjust node arrays
shrinker: Kill old ->shrink API.
shrinker: convert remaining shrinkers to count/scan API
staging/lustre/libcfs: cleanup linux-mem.h
staging/lustre/ptlrpc: convert to new shrinker API
staging/lustre/obdclass: convert lu_object shrinker to count/scan API
staging/lustre/ldlm: convert to shrinkers to count/scan API
hugepage: convert huge zero page shrinker to new shrinker API
i915: bail out earlier when shrinker cannot acquire mutex
drivers: convert shrinkers to new count/scan API
fs: convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API
xfs: fix dquot isolation hang
xfs-convert-dquot-cache-lru-to-list_lru-fix
xfs: convert dquot cache lru to list_lru
xfs: rework buffer dispose list tracking
xfs-convert-buftarg-lru-to-generic-code-fix
xfs: convert buftarg LRU to generic code
fs: convert inode and dentry shrinking to be node aware
vmscan: per-node deferred work
...
12 Sep, 2013
3 commits
-
This patch is based on KOSAKI's work and I add a little more description,
please refer https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/14/74.Currently, I found system can enter a state that there are lots of free
pages in a zone but only order-0 and order-1 pages which means the zone is
heavily fragmented, then high order allocation could make direct reclaim
path's long stall(ex, 60 seconds) especially in no swap and no compaciton
enviroment. This problem happened on v3.4, but it seems issue still lives
in current tree, the reason is do_try_to_free_pages enter live lock:kswapd will go to sleep if the zones have been fully scanned and are still
not balanced. As kswapd thinks there's little point trying all over again
to avoid infinite loop. Instead it changes order from high-order to
0-order because kswapd think order-0 is the most important. Look at
73ce02e9 in detail. If watermarks are ok, kswapd will go back to sleep
and may leave zone->all_unreclaimable =3D 0. It assume high-order users
can still perform direct reclaim if they wish.Direct reclaim continue to reclaim for a high order which is not a
COSTLY_ORDER without oom-killer until kswapd turn on
zone->all_unreclaimble= . This is because to avoid too early oom-kill.
So it means direct_reclaim depends on kswapd to break this loop.In worst case, direct-reclaim may continue to page reclaim forever when
kswapd sleeps forever until someone like watchdog detect and finally kill
the process. As described in:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/103737We can't turn on zone->all_unreclaimable from direct reclaim path because
direct reclaim path don't take any lock and this way is racy. Thus this
patch removes zone->all_unreclaimable field completely and recalculates
zone reclaimable state every time.Note: we can't take the idea that direct-reclaim see zone->pages_scanned
directly and kswapd continue to use zone->all_unreclaimable. Because, it
is racy. commit 929bea7c71 (vmscan: all_unreclaimable() use
zone->all_unreclaimable as a name) describes the detail.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: uninline zone_reclaimable_pages() and zone_reclaimable()]
Cc: Aaditya Kumar
Cc: Ying Han
Cc: Nick Piggin
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Bob Liu
Cc: Neil Zhang
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Minchan Kim
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
Signed-off-by: Lisa Du
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The goal of this patch series is to improve performance of munlock() of
large mlocked memory areas on systems without THP. This is motivated by
reported very long times of crash recovery of processes with such areas,
where munlock() can take several seconds. See
http://lwn.net/Articles/548108/The work was driven by a simple benchmark (to be included in mmtests) that
mmaps() e.g. 56GB with MAP_LOCKED | MAP_POPULATE and measures the time of
munlock(). Profiling was performed by attaching operf --pid to the
process and sending a signal to trigger the munlock() part and then notify
bach the monitoring wrapper to stop operf, so that only munlock() appears
in the profile.The profiles have shown that CPU time is spent mostly by atomic operations
and repeated locking per single pages. This series aims to reduce both, starting
from simpler to more complex changes.Patch 1 performs a simple cleanup in putback_lru_page() so that page lru base
type is not determined without being actually needed.Patch 2 removes an unnecessary call to lru_add_drain() which drains the per-cpu
pagevec after each munlocked page is put there.Patch 3 changes munlock_vma_range() to use an on-stack pagevec for isolating
multiple non-THP pages under a single lru_lock instead of locking and
processing each page separately.Patch 4 changes the NR_MLOCK accounting to be called only once per the pvec
introduced by previous patch.Patch 5 uses the introduced pagevec to batch also the work of putback_lru_page
when possible, bypassing the per-cpu pvec and associated overhead.Patch 6 removes a redundant get_page/put_page pair which saves costly atomic
operations.Patch 7 avoids calling follow_page_mask() on each individual page, and obtains
multiple page references under a single page table lock where possible.Measurements were made using 3.11-rc3 as a baseline. The first set of
measurements shows the possibly ideal conditions where batching should
help the most. All memory is allocated from a single NUMA node and THP is
disabled.timedmunlock
3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Elapsed min 3.38 ( 0.00%) 3.39 ( -0.13%) 3.00 ( 11.33%) 2.70 ( 20.20%) 2.67 ( 21.11%) 2.37 ( 29.88%) 2.20 ( 34.91%) 1.91 ( 43.59%)
Elapsed mean 3.39 ( 0.00%) 3.40 ( -0.23%) 3.01 ( 11.33%) 2.70 ( 20.26%) 2.67 ( 21.21%) 2.38 ( 29.88%) 2.21 ( 34.93%) 1.92 ( 43.46%)
Elapsed stddev 0.01 ( 0.00%) 0.01 (-43.09%) 0.01 ( 15.42%) 0.01 ( 23.42%) 0.00 ( 89.78%) 0.01 ( -7.15%) 0.00 ( 76.69%) 0.02 (-91.77%)
Elapsed max 3.41 ( 0.00%) 3.43 ( -0.52%) 3.03 ( 11.29%) 2.72 ( 20.16%) 2.67 ( 21.63%) 2.40 ( 29.50%) 2.21 ( 35.21%) 1.96 ( 42.39%)
Elapsed range 0.03 ( 0.00%) 0.04 (-51.16%) 0.02 ( 6.27%) 0.02 ( 14.67%) 0.00 ( 88.90%) 0.03 (-19.18%) 0.01 ( 73.70%) 0.06 (-113.35%The second set of measurements simulates the worst possible conditions for
batching by using numactl --interleave, so that there is in fact only one
page per pagevec. Even in this case the series seems to improve
performance thanks to reduced atomic operations and removal of
lru_add_drain().timedmunlock
3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Elapsed min 4.00 ( 0.00%) 4.04 ( -0.93%) 3.87 ( 3.37%) 3.72 ( 6.94%) 3.81 ( 4.72%) 3.69 ( 7.82%) 3.64 ( 8.92%) 3.41 ( 14.81%)
Elapsed mean 4.17 ( 0.00%) 4.15 ( 0.51%) 4.03 ( 3.49%) 3.89 ( 6.84%) 3.86 ( 7.48%) 3.89 ( 6.69%) 3.70 ( 11.27%) 3.48 ( 16.59%)
Elapsed stddev 0.16 ( 0.00%) 0.08 ( 50.76%) 0.10 ( 41.58%) 0.16 ( 4.59%) 0.05 ( 72.38%) 0.19 (-12.91%) 0.05 ( 68.09%) 0.06 ( 66.03%)
Elapsed max 4.34 ( 0.00%) 4.32 ( 0.56%) 4.19 ( 3.62%) 4.12 ( 5.15%) 3.91 ( 9.88%) 4.12 ( 5.25%) 3.80 ( 12.58%) 3.56 ( 18.08%)
Elapsed range 0.34 ( 0.00%) 0.28 ( 17.91%) 0.32 ( 6.45%) 0.40 (-15.73%) 0.10 ( 70.06%) 0.43 (-24.84%) 0.15 ( 55.32%) 0.15 ( 56.16%)For completeness, a third set of measurements shows the situation where
THP is enabled and allocations are again done on a single NUMA node. Here
munlock() is already very fast thanks to huge pages, and this series does
not compromise that performance. It seems that the removal of call to
lru_add_drain() still helps a bit.timedmunlock
3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3 3.11-rc3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Elapsed min 0.01 ( 0.00%) 0.01 ( -0.11%) 0.01 ( 6.59%) 0.01 ( 5.41%) 0.01 ( 5.45%) 0.01 ( 5.03%) 0.01 ( 6.08%) 0.01 ( 5.20%)
Elapsed mean 0.01 ( 0.00%) 0.01 ( -0.27%) 0.01 ( 6.39%) 0.01 ( 5.30%) 0.01 ( 5.32%) 0.01 ( 5.03%) 0.01 ( 5.97%) 0.01 ( 5.22%)
Elapsed stddev 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( -9.59%) 0.00 ( 10.77%) 0.00 ( 3.24%) 0.00 ( 24.42%) 0.00 ( 31.86%) 0.00 ( -7.46%) 0.00 ( 6.11%)
Elapsed max 0.01 ( 0.00%) 0.01 ( -0.01%) 0.01 ( 6.83%) 0.01 ( 5.42%) 0.01 ( 5.79%) 0.01 ( 5.53%) 0.01 ( 6.08%) 0.01 ( 5.26%)
Elapsed range 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 7.30%) 0.00 ( 24.38%) 0.00 ( 6.10%) 0.00 ( 30.79%) 0.00 ( 42.52%) 0.00 ( 6.11%) 0.00 ( 10.07%)This patch (of 7):
In putback_lru_page() since commit c53954a092 (""mm: remove lru parameter
from __lru_cache_add and lru_cache_add_lru") it is no longer needed to
determine lru list via page_lru_base_type().This patch replaces it with simple flag is_unevictable which says that the
page was put on the inevictable list. This is the only information that
matters in subsequent tests.Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka
Reviewed-by: Jörn Engel
Acked-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Michel Lespinasse
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The way the page allocator interacts with kswapd creates aging imbalances,
where the amount of time a userspace page gets in memory under reclaim
pressure is dependent on which zone, which node the allocator took the
page frame from.#1 fixes missed kswapd wakeups on NUMA systems, which lead to some
nodes falling behind for a full reclaim cycle relative to the other
nodes in the system#3 fixes an interaction where kswapd and a continuous stream of page
allocations keep the preferred zone of a task between the high and
low watermark (allocations succeed + kswapd does not go to sleep)
indefinitely, completely underutilizing the lower zones and
thrashing on the preferred zoneThese patches are the aging fairness part of the thrash-detection based
file LRU balancing. Andrea recommended to submit them separately as they
are bugfixes in their own right.The following test ran a foreground workload (memcachetest) with
background IO of various sizes on a 4 node 8G system (similar results were
observed with single-node 4G systems):parallelio
BAS FAIRALLO
BASE FAIRALLOC
Ops memcachetest-0M 5170.00 ( 0.00%) 5283.00 ( 2.19%)
Ops memcachetest-791M 4740.00 ( 0.00%) 5293.00 ( 11.67%)
Ops memcachetest-2639M 2551.00 ( 0.00%) 4950.00 ( 94.04%)
Ops memcachetest-4487M 2606.00 ( 0.00%) 3922.00 ( 50.50%)
Ops io-duration-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops io-duration-791M 55.00 ( 0.00%) 18.00 ( 67.27%)
Ops io-duration-2639M 235.00 ( 0.00%) 103.00 ( 56.17%)
Ops io-duration-4487M 278.00 ( 0.00%) 173.00 ( 37.77%)
Ops swaptotal-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swaptotal-791M 245184.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swaptotal-2639M 468069.00 ( 0.00%) 108778.00 ( 76.76%)
Ops swaptotal-4487M 452529.00 ( 0.00%) 76623.00 ( 83.07%)
Ops swapin-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-791M 108297.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-2639M 169537.00 ( 0.00%) 50031.00 ( 70.49%)
Ops swapin-4487M 167435.00 ( 0.00%) 34178.00 ( 79.59%)
Ops minorfaults-0M 1518666.00 ( 0.00%) 1503993.00 ( 0.97%)
Ops minorfaults-791M 1676963.00 ( 0.00%) 1520115.00 ( 9.35%)
Ops minorfaults-2639M 1606035.00 ( 0.00%) 1799717.00 (-12.06%)
Ops minorfaults-4487M 1612118.00 ( 0.00%) 1583825.00 ( 1.76%)
Ops majorfaults-0M 6.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops majorfaults-791M 13836.00 ( 0.00%) 10.00 ( 99.93%)
Ops majorfaults-2639M 22307.00 ( 0.00%) 6490.00 ( 70.91%)
Ops majorfaults-4487M 21631.00 ( 0.00%) 4380.00 ( 79.75%)BAS FAIRALLO
BASE FAIRALLOC
User 287.78 460.97
System 2151.67 3142.51
Elapsed 9737.00 8879.34BAS FAIRALLO
BASE FAIRALLOC
Minor Faults 53721925 57188551
Major Faults 392195 15157
Swap Ins 2994854 112770
Swap Outs 4907092 134982
Direct pages scanned 0 41824
Kswapd pages scanned 32975063 8128269
Kswapd pages reclaimed 6323069 7093495
Direct pages reclaimed 0 41824
Kswapd efficiency 19% 87%
Kswapd velocity 3386.573 915.414
Direct efficiency 100% 100%
Direct velocity 0.000 4.710
Percentage direct scans 0% 0%
Zone normal velocity 2011.338 550.661
Zone dma32 velocity 1365.623 369.221
Zone dma velocity 9.612 0.242
Page writes by reclaim 18732404.000 614807.000
Page writes file 13825312 479825
Page writes anon 4907092 134982
Page reclaim immediate 85490 5647
Sector Reads 12080532 483244
Sector Writes 88740508 65438876
Page rescued immediate 0 0
Slabs scanned 82560 12160
Direct inode steals 0 0
Kswapd inode steals 24401 40013
Kswapd skipped wait 0 0
THP fault alloc 6 8
THP collapse alloc 5481 5812
THP splits 75 22
THP fault fallback 0 0
THP collapse fail 0 0
Compaction stalls 0 54
Compaction success 0 45
Compaction failures 0 9
Page migrate success 881492 82278
Page migrate failure 0 0
Compaction pages isolated 0 60334
Compaction migrate scanned 0 53505
Compaction free scanned 0 1537605
Compaction cost 914 86
NUMA PTE updates 46738231 41988419
NUMA hint faults 31175564 24213387
NUMA hint local faults 10427393 6411593
NUMA pages migrated 881492 55344
AutoNUMA cost 156221 121361The overall runtime was reduced, throughput for both the foreground
workload as well as the background IO improved, major faults, swapping and
reclaim activity shrunk significantly, reclaim efficiency more than
quadrupled.This patch:
When the page allocator fails to get a page from all zones in its given
zonelist, it wakes up the per-node kswapds for all zones that are at their
low watermark.However, with a system under load the free pages in a zone can fluctuate
enough that the allocation fails but the kswapd wakeup is also skipped
while the zone is still really close to the low watermark.When one node misses a wakeup like this, it won't be aged before all the
other node's zones are down to their low watermarks again. And skipping a
full aging cycle is an obvious fairness problem.Kswapd runs until the high watermarks are restored, so it should also be
woken when the high watermarks are not met. This ages nodes more equally
and creates a safety margin for the page counter fluctuation.By using zone_balanced(), it will now check, in addition to the watermark,
if compaction requires more order-0 pages to create a higher order page.Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Mel Gorman
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli
Cc: Paul Bolle
Tested-by: Zlatko Calusic
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
11 Sep, 2013
4 commits
-
There are no more users of this API, so kill it dead, dead, dead and
quietly bury the corpse in a shallow, unmarked grave in a dark forest deep
in the hills...[glommer@openvz.org: added flowers to the grave]
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa
Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen
Acked-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o"
Cc: Adrian Hunter
Cc: Al Viro
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy
Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg
Cc: Carlos Maiolino
Cc: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Chuck Lever
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Gleb Natapov
Cc: Greg Thelen
Cc: J. Bruce Fields
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Jerome Glisse
Cc: John Stultz
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Kent Overstreet
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Steven Whitehouse
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom
Cc: Trond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Andrew MortonSigned-off-by: Al Viro
-
The list_lru infrastructure already keeps per-node LRU lists in its
node-specific list_lru_node arrays and provide us with a per-node API, and
the shrinkers are properly equiped with node information. This means that
we can now focus our shrinking effort in a single node, but the work that
is deferred from one run to another is kept global at nr_in_batch. Work
can be deferred, for instance, during direct reclaim under a GFP_NOFS
allocation, where situation, all the filesystem shrinkers will be
prevented from running and accumulate in nr_in_batch the amount of work
they should have done, but could not.This creates an impedance problem, where upon node pressure, work deferred
will accumulate and end up being flushed in other nodes. The problem we
describe is particularly harmful in big machines, where many nodes can
accumulate at the same time, all adding to the global counter nr_in_batch.
As we accumulate more and more, we start to ask for the caches to flush
even bigger numbers. The result is that the caches are depleted and do
not stabilize. To achieve stable steady state behavior, we need to tackle
it differently.In this patch we keep the deferred count per-node, in the new array
nr_deferred[] (the name is also a bit more descriptive) and will never
accumulate that to other nodes.Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa
Cc: Dave Chinner
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o"
Cc: Adrian Hunter
Cc: Al Viro
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy
Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg
Cc: Carlos Maiolino
Cc: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Chuck Lever
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Gleb Natapov
Cc: Greg Thelen
Cc: J. Bruce Fields
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Jerome Glisse
Cc: John Stultz
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Kent Overstreet
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Steven Whitehouse
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom
Cc: Trond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Al Viro -
Pass the node of the current zone being reclaimed to shrink_slab(),
allowing the shrinker control nodemask to be set appropriately for node
aware shrinkers.Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa
Acked-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o"
Cc: Adrian Hunter
Cc: Al Viro
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy
Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg
Cc: Carlos Maiolino
Cc: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Chuck Lever
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Gleb Natapov
Cc: Greg Thelen
Cc: J. Bruce Fields
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Jerome Glisse
Cc: John Stultz
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Kent Overstreet
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Steven Whitehouse
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom
Cc: Trond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Al Viro -
The current shrinker callout API uses an a single shrinker call for
multiple functions. To determine the function, a special magical value is
passed in a parameter to change the behaviour. This complicates the
implementation and return value specification for the different
behaviours.Separate the two different behaviours into separate operations, one to
return a count of freeable objects in the cache, and another to scan a
certain number of objects in the cache for freeing. In defining these new
operations, ensure the return values and resultant behaviours are clearly
defined and documented.Modify shrink_slab() to use the new API and implement the callouts for all
the existing shrinkers.Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa
Acked-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o"
Cc: Adrian Hunter
Cc: Al Viro
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy
Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg
Cc: Carlos Maiolino
Cc: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Chuck Lever
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Gleb Natapov
Cc: Greg Thelen
Cc: J. Bruce Fields
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Jerome Glisse
Cc: John Stultz
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Kent Overstreet
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Steven Whitehouse
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom
Cc: Trond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
10 Jul, 2013
2 commits
-
After the patch "mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd priority loop" was merged
the scanning priority of kswapd changed.The priority now rises until it is scanning enough pages to meet the
high watermark. shrink_inactive_list sets ZONE_WRITEBACK if a number of
pages were encountered under writeback but this value is scaled based on
the priority. As kswapd frequently scans with a higher priority now it
is relatively easy to set ZONE_WRITEBACK. This patch removes the
scaling and treates writeback pages similar to how it treats unqueued
dirty pages and congested pages. The user-visible effect should be that
kswapd will writeback fewer pages from reclaim context.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Dave Chinner
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Direct reclaim is not aborting to allow compaction to go ahead properly.
do_try_to_free_pages is told to abort reclaim which is happily ignores
and instead increases priority instead until it reaches 0 and starts
shrinking file/anon equally. This patch corrects the situation by
aborting reclaim when requested instead of raising priority.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Dave Chinner
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
04 Jul, 2013
16 commits
-
Similar to __pagevec_lru_add, this patch removes the LRU parameter from
__lru_cache_add and lru_cache_add_lru as the caller does not control the
exact LRU the page gets added to. lru_cache_add_lru gets renamed to
lru_cache_add the name is silly without the lru parameter. With the
parameter removed, it is required that the caller indicate if they want
the page added to the active or inactive list by setting or clearing
PageActive respectively.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: Suggested the patch]
[gang.chen@asianux.com: fix used-unintialized warning]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Rik van Riel
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Alexey Lyahkov
Cc: Andrew Perepechko
Cc: Robin Dong
Cc: Theodore Tso
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Bernd Schubert
Cc: David Howells
Cc: Trond Myklebust
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Page reclaim keeps track of dirty and under writeback pages and uses it
to determine if wait_iff_congested() should stall or if kswapd should
begin writing back pages. This fails to account for buffer pages that
can be under writeback but not PageWriteback which is the case for
filesystems like ext3 ordered mode. Furthermore, PageDirty buffer pages
can have all the buffers clean and writepage does no IO so it should not
be accounted as congested.This patch adds an address_space operation that filesystems may
optionally use to check if a page is really dirty or really under
writeback. An implementation is provided for for buffer_heads is added
and used for block operations and ext3 in ordered mode. By default the
page flags are obeyed.Credit goes to Jan Kara for identifying that the page flags alone are
not sufficient for ext3 and sanity checking a number of ideas on how the
problem could be addressed.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Cc: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Cc: Trond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Currently a zone will only be marked congested if the underlying BDI is
congested but if dirty pages are spread across zones it is possible that
an individual zone is full of dirty pages without being congested. The
impact is that zone gets scanned very quickly potentially reclaiming
really clean pages. This patch treats pages marked for immediate
reclaim as congested for the purposes of marking a zone ZONE_CONGESTED
and stalling in wait_iff_congested.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Cc: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Cc: Trond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
shrink_inactive_list makes decisions on whether to stall based on the
number of dirty pages encountered. The wait_iff_congested() call in
shrink_page_list does no such thing and it's arbitrary.This patch moves the decision on whether to set ZONE_CONGESTED and the
wait_iff_congested call into shrink_page_list. This keeps all the
decisions on whether to stall or not in the one place.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Cc: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Cc: Trond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
In shrink_page_list a decision may be made to stall and flag a zone as
ZONE_WRITEBACK so that if a large number of unqueued dirty pages are
encountered later then the reclaimer will stall. Set ZONE_WRITEBACK
before potentially going to sleep so it is noticed sooner.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Cc: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Cc: Trond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Commit "mm: vmscan: Block kswapd if it is encountering pages under
writeback" blocks page reclaim if it encounters pages under writeback
marked for immediate reclaim. It blocks while pages are still isolated
from the LRU which is unnecessary. This patch defers the blocking until
after the isolated pages have been processed and tidies up some of the
comments.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Cc: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Cc: Trond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Further testing of the "Reduce system disruption due to kswapd"
discovered a few problems. First and foremost, it's possible for pages
under writeback to be freed which will lead to badness. Second, as
pages were not being swapped the file LRU was being scanned faster and
clean file pages were being reclaimed. In some cases this results in
increased read IO to re-read data from disk. Third, more pages were
being written from kswapd context which can adversly affect IO
performance. Lastly, it was observed that PageDirty pages are not
necessarily dirty on all filesystems (buffers can be clean while
PageDirty is set and ->writepage generates no IO) and not all
filesystems set PageWriteback when the page is being written (e.g.
ext3). This disconnect confuses the reclaim stalling logic. This
follow-up series is aimed at these problems.The tests were based on three kernels
vanilla: kernel 3.9 as that is what the current mmotm uses as a baseline
mmotm-20130522 is mmotm as of 22nd May with "Reduce system disruption due to
kswapd" applied on top as per what should be in Andrew's tree
right now
lessdisrupt-v7r10 is this follow-up series on top of the mmotm kernelThe first test used memcached+memcachetest while some background IO was
in progress as implemented by the parallel IO tests implement in MM
Tests. memcachetest benchmarks how many operations/second memcached can
service. It starts with no background IO on a freshly created ext4
filesystem and then re-runs the test with larger amounts of IO in the
background to roughly simulate a large copy in progress. The
expectation is that the IO should have little or no impact on
memcachetest which is running entirely in memory.parallelio
3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
vanilla mm1-mmotm-20130522 mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
Ops memcachetest-0M 23117.00 ( 0.00%) 22780.00 ( -1.46%) 22763.00 ( -1.53%)
Ops memcachetest-715M 23774.00 ( 0.00%) 23299.00 ( -2.00%) 22934.00 ( -3.53%)
Ops memcachetest-2385M 4208.00 ( 0.00%) 24154.00 (474.00%) 23765.00 (464.76%)
Ops memcachetest-4055M 4104.00 ( 0.00%) 25130.00 (512.33%) 24614.00 (499.76%)
Ops io-duration-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops io-duration-715M 12.00 ( 0.00%) 7.00 ( 41.67%) 6.00 ( 50.00%)
Ops io-duration-2385M 116.00 ( 0.00%) 21.00 ( 81.90%) 21.00 ( 81.90%)
Ops io-duration-4055M 160.00 ( 0.00%) 36.00 ( 77.50%) 35.00 ( 78.12%)
Ops swaptotal-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swaptotal-715M 140138.00 ( 0.00%) 18.00 ( 99.99%) 18.00 ( 99.99%)
Ops swaptotal-2385M 385682.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swaptotal-4055M 418029.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-715M 144.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-2385M 134227.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-4055M 125618.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops minorfaults-0M 1536429.00 ( 0.00%) 1531632.00 ( 0.31%) 1533541.00 ( 0.19%)
Ops minorfaults-715M 1786996.00 ( 0.00%) 1612148.00 ( 9.78%) 1608832.00 ( 9.97%)
Ops minorfaults-2385M 1757952.00 ( 0.00%) 1614874.00 ( 8.14%) 1613541.00 ( 8.21%)
Ops minorfaults-4055M 1774460.00 ( 0.00%) 1633400.00 ( 7.95%) 1630881.00 ( 8.09%)
Ops majorfaults-0M 1.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops majorfaults-715M 184.00 ( 0.00%) 167.00 ( 9.24%) 166.00 ( 9.78%)
Ops majorfaults-2385M 24444.00 ( 0.00%) 155.00 ( 99.37%) 93.00 ( 99.62%)
Ops majorfaults-4055M 21357.00 ( 0.00%) 147.00 ( 99.31%) 134.00 ( 99.37%)memcachetest is the transactions/second reported by memcachetest. In
the vanilla kernel note that performance drops from around
23K/sec to just over 4K/second when there is 2385M of IO going
on in the background. With current mmotm, there is no collapse
in performance and with this follow-up series there is little
change.swaptotal is the total amount of swap traffic. With mmotm and the follow-up
series, the total amount of swapping is much reduced.3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
vanillamm1-mmotm-20130522mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
Minor Faults 11160152 10706748 10622316
Major Faults 46305 755 678
Swap Ins 260249 0 0
Swap Outs 683860 18 18
Direct pages scanned 0 678 2520
Kswapd pages scanned 6046108 8814900 1639279
Kswapd pages reclaimed 1081954 1172267 1094635
Direct pages reclaimed 0 566 2304
Kswapd efficiency 17% 13% 66%
Kswapd velocity 5217.560 7618.953 1414.879
Direct efficiency 100% 83% 91%
Direct velocity 0.000 0.586 2.175
Percentage direct scans 0% 0% 0%
Zone normal velocity 5105.086 6824.681 671.158
Zone dma32 velocity 112.473 794.858 745.896
Zone dma velocity 0.000 0.000 0.000
Page writes by reclaim 1929612.000 6861768.000 32821.000
Page writes file 1245752 6861750 32803
Page writes anon 683860 18 18
Page reclaim immediate 7484 40 239
Sector Reads 1130320 93996 86900
Sector Writes 13508052 10823500 11804436
Page rescued immediate 0 0 0
Slabs scanned 33536 27136 18560
Direct inode steals 0 0 0
Kswapd inode steals 8641 1035 0
Kswapd skipped wait 0 0 0
THP fault alloc 8 37 33
THP collapse alloc 508 552 515
THP splits 24 1 1
THP fault fallback 0 0 0
THP collapse fail 0 0 0There are a number of observations to make here
1. Swap outs are almost eliminated. Swap ins are 0 indicating that the
pages swapped were really unused anonymous pages. Related to that,
major faults are much reduced.2. kswapd efficiency was impacted by the initial series but with these
follow-up patches, the efficiency is now at 66% indicating that far
fewer pages were skipped during scanning due to dirty or writeback
pages.3. kswapd velocity is reduced indicating that fewer pages are being scanned
with the follow-up series as kswapd now stalls when the tail of the
LRU queue is full of unqueued dirty pages. The stall gives flushers a
chance to catch-up so kswapd can reclaim clean pages when it wakes4. In light of Zlatko's recent reports about zone scanning imbalances,
mmtests now reports scanning velocity on a per-zone basis. With mainline,
you can see that the scanning activity is dominated by the Normal
zone with over 45 times more scanning in Normal than the DMA32 zone.
With the series currently in mmotm, the ratio is slightly better but it
is still the case that the bulk of scanning is in the highest zone. With
this follow-up series, the ratio of scanning between the Normal and
DMA32 zone is roughly equal.5. As Dave Chinner observed, the current patches in mmotm increased the
number of pages written from kswapd context which is expected to adversly
impact IO performance. With the follow-up patches, far fewer pages are
written from kswapd context than the mainline kernel6. With the series in mmotm, fewer inodes were reclaimed by kswapd. With
the follow-up series, there is less slab shrinking activity and no inodes
were reclaimed.7. Note that "Sectors Read" is drastically reduced implying that the source
data being used for the IO is not being aggressively discarded due to
page reclaim skipping over dirty pages and reclaiming clean pages. Note
that the reducion in reads could also be due to inode data not being
re-read from disk after a slab shrink.3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
vanillamm1-mmotm-20130522mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
Mean sda-avgqz 166.99 32.09 33.44
Mean sda-await 853.64 192.76 185.43
Mean sda-r_await 6.31 9.24 5.97
Mean sda-w_await 2992.81 202.65 192.43
Max sda-avgqz 1409.91 718.75 698.98
Max sda-await 6665.74 3538.00 3124.23
Max sda-r_await 58.96 111.95 58.00
Max sda-w_await 28458.94 3977.29 3148.61In light of the changes in writes from reclaim context, the number of
reads and Dave Chinner's concerns about IO performance I took a closer
look at the IO stats for the test disk. Few observations1. The average queue size is reduced by the initial series and roughly
the same with this follow up.2. Average wait times for writes are reduced and as the IO
is completing faster it at least implies that the gain is because
flushers are writing the files efficiently instead of page reclaim
getting in the way.3. The reduction in maximum write latency is staggering. 28 seconds down
to 3 seconds.Jan Kara asked how NFS is affected by all of this. Unstable pages can
be taken into account as one of the patches in the series shows but it
is still the case that filesystems with unusual handling of dirty or
writeback could still be treated better.Tests like postmark, fsmark and largedd showed up nothing useful. On my test
setup, pages are simply not being written back from reclaim context with or
without the patches and there are no changes in performance. My test setup
probably is just not strong enough network-wise to be really interesting.I ran a longer-lived memcached test with IO going to NFS instead of a local disk
parallelio
3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
vanilla mm1-mmotm-20130522 mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
Ops memcachetest-0M 23323.00 ( 0.00%) 23241.00 ( -0.35%) 23321.00 ( -0.01%)
Ops memcachetest-715M 25526.00 ( 0.00%) 24763.00 ( -2.99%) 23242.00 ( -8.95%)
Ops memcachetest-2385M 8814.00 ( 0.00%) 26924.00 (205.47%) 23521.00 (166.86%)
Ops memcachetest-4055M 5835.00 ( 0.00%) 26827.00 (359.76%) 25560.00 (338.05%)
Ops io-duration-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops io-duration-715M 65.00 ( 0.00%) 71.00 ( -9.23%) 11.00 ( 83.08%)
Ops io-duration-2385M 129.00 ( 0.00%) 94.00 ( 27.13%) 53.00 ( 58.91%)
Ops io-duration-4055M 301.00 ( 0.00%) 100.00 ( 66.78%) 108.00 ( 64.12%)
Ops swaptotal-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swaptotal-715M 14394.00 ( 0.00%) 949.00 ( 93.41%) 63.00 ( 99.56%)
Ops swaptotal-2385M 401483.00 ( 0.00%) 24437.00 ( 93.91%) 30118.00 ( 92.50%)
Ops swaptotal-4055M 554123.00 ( 0.00%) 35688.00 ( 93.56%) 63082.00 ( 88.62%)
Ops swapin-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-715M 4522.00 ( 0.00%) 560.00 ( 87.62%) 63.00 ( 98.61%)
Ops swapin-2385M 169861.00 ( 0.00%) 5026.00 ( 97.04%) 13917.00 ( 91.81%)
Ops swapin-4055M 192374.00 ( 0.00%) 10056.00 ( 94.77%) 25729.00 ( 86.63%)
Ops minorfaults-0M 1445969.00 ( 0.00%) 1520878.00 ( -5.18%) 1454024.00 ( -0.56%)
Ops minorfaults-715M 1557288.00 ( 0.00%) 1528482.00 ( 1.85%) 1535776.00 ( 1.38%)
Ops minorfaults-2385M 1692896.00 ( 0.00%) 1570523.00 ( 7.23%) 1559622.00 ( 7.87%)
Ops minorfaults-4055M 1654985.00 ( 0.00%) 1581456.00 ( 4.44%) 1596713.00 ( 3.52%)
Ops majorfaults-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 1.00 (-99.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops majorfaults-715M 763.00 ( 0.00%) 265.00 ( 65.27%) 75.00 ( 90.17%)
Ops majorfaults-2385M 23861.00 ( 0.00%) 894.00 ( 96.25%) 2189.00 ( 90.83%)
Ops majorfaults-4055M 27210.00 ( 0.00%) 1569.00 ( 94.23%) 4088.00 ( 84.98%)1. Performance does not collapse due to IO which is good. IO is also completing
faster. Note with mmotm, IO completes in a third of the time and faster again
with this series applied2. Swapping is reduced, although not eliminated. The figures for the follow-up
look bad but it does vary a bit as the stalling is not perfect for nfs
or filesystems like ext3 with unusual handling of dirty and writeback
pages3. There are swapins, particularly with larger amounts of IO indicating
that active pages are being reclaimed. However, the number of much
reduced.3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
vanillamm1-mmotm-20130522mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
Minor Faults 36339175 35025445 35219699
Major Faults 310964 27108 51887
Swap Ins 2176399 173069 333316
Swap Outs 3344050 357228 504824
Direct pages scanned 8972 77283 43242
Kswapd pages scanned 20899983 8939566 14772851
Kswapd pages reclaimed 6193156 5172605 5231026
Direct pages reclaimed 8450 73802 39514
Kswapd efficiency 29% 57% 35%
Kswapd velocity 3929.743 1847.499 3058.840
Direct efficiency 94% 95% 91%
Direct velocity 1.687 15.972 8.954
Percentage direct scans 0% 0% 0%
Zone normal velocity 3721.907 939.103 2185.142
Zone dma32 velocity 209.522 924.368 882.651
Zone dma velocity 0.000 0.000 0.000
Page writes by reclaim 4082185.000 526319.000 537114.000
Page writes file 738135 169091 32290
Page writes anon 3344050 357228 504824
Page reclaim immediate 9524 170 5595843
Sector Reads 8909900 861192 1483680
Sector Writes 13428980 1488744 2076800
Page rescued immediate 0 0 0
Slabs scanned 38016 31744 28672
Direct inode steals 0 0 0
Kswapd inode steals 424 0 0
Kswapd skipped wait 0 0 0
THP fault alloc 14 15 119
THP collapse alloc 1767 1569 1618
THP splits 30 29 25
THP fault fallback 0 0 0
THP collapse fail 8 5 0
Compaction stalls 17 41 100
Compaction success 7 31 95
Compaction failures 10 10 5
Page migrate success 7083 22157 62217
Page migrate failure 0 0 0
Compaction pages isolated 14847 48758 135830
Compaction migrate scanned 18328 48398 138929
Compaction free scanned 2000255 355827 1720269
Compaction cost 7 24 68I guess the main takeaway again is the much reduced page writes
from reclaim context and reduced reads.3.9.0 3.9.0 3.9.0
vanillamm1-mmotm-20130522mm1-lessdisrupt-v7r10
Mean sda-avgqz 23.58 0.35 0.44
Mean sda-await 133.47 15.72 15.46
Mean sda-r_await 4.72 4.69 3.95
Mean sda-w_await 507.69 28.40 33.68
Max sda-avgqz 680.60 12.25 23.14
Max sda-await 3958.89 221.83 286.22
Max sda-r_await 63.86 61.23 67.29
Max sda-w_await 11710.38 883.57 1767.28And as before, write wait times are much reduced.
This patch:
The patch "mm: vmscan: Have kswapd writeback pages based on dirty pages
encountered, not priority" decides whether to writeback pages from reclaim
context based on the number of dirty pages encountered. This situation is
flagged too easily and flushers are not given the chance to catch up
resulting in more pages being written from reclaim context and potentially
impacting IO performance. The check for PageWriteback is also misplaced
as it happens within a PageDirty check which is nonsense as the dirty may
have been cleared for IO. The accounting is updated very late and pages
that are already under writeback, were reactivated, could not unmapped or
could not be released are all missed. Similarly, a page is considered
congested for reasons other than being congested and pages that cannot be
written out in the correct context are skipped. Finally, it considers
stalling and writing back filesystem pages due to encountering dirty
anonymous pages at the tail of the LRU which is dumb.This patch causes kswapd to begin writing filesystem pages from reclaim
context only if page reclaim found that all filesystem pages at the tail
of the LRU were unqueued dirty pages. Before it starts writing filesystem
pages, it will stall to give flushers a chance to catch up. The decision
on whether wait_iff_congested is also now determined by dirty filesystem
pages only. Congested pages are based on whether the underlying BDI is
congested regardless of the context of the reclaiming process.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Cc: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Cc: Trond Myklebust
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
balance_pgdat() is very long and some of the logic can and should be
internal to kswapd_shrink_zone(). Move it so the flow of
balance_pgdat() is marginally easier to follow.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Tested-by: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Currently kswapd checks if it should start writepage as it shrinks each
zone without taking into consideration if the zone is balanced or not.
This is not wrong as such but it does not make much sense either. This
patch checks once per pgdat scan if kswapd should be writing pages.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Tested-by: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Historically, kswapd used to congestion_wait() at higher priorities if
it was not making forward progress. This made no sense as the failure
to make progress could be completely independent of IO. It was later
replaced by wait_iff_congested() and removed entirely by commit 258401a6
(mm: don't wait on congested zones in balance_pgdat()) as it was
duplicating logic in shrink_inactive_list().This is problematic. If kswapd encounters many pages under writeback
and it continues to scan until it reaches the high watermark then it
will quickly skip over the pages under writeback and reclaim clean young
pages or push applications out to swap.The use of wait_iff_congested() is not suited to kswapd as it will only
stall if the underlying BDI is really congested or a direct reclaimer
was unable to write to the underlying BDI. kswapd bypasses the BDI
congestion as it sets PF_SWAPWRITE but even if this was taken into
account then it would cause direct reclaimers to stall on writeback
which is not desirable.This patch sets a ZONE_WRITEBACK flag if direct reclaim or kswapd is
encountering too many pages under writeback. If this flag is set and
kswapd encounters a PageReclaim page under writeback then it'll assume
that the LRU lists are being recycled too quickly before IO can complete
and block waiting for some IO to complete.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Tested-by: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Currently kswapd queues dirty pages for writeback if scanning at an
elevated priority but the priority kswapd scans at is not related to the
number of unqueued dirty encountered. Since commit "mm: vmscan: Flatten
kswapd priority loop", the priority is related to the size of the LRU
and the zone watermark which is no indication as to whether kswapd
should write pages or not.This patch tracks if an excessive number of unqueued dirty pages are
being encountered at the end of the LRU. If so, it indicates that dirty
pages are being recycled before flusher threads can clean them and flags
the zone so that kswapd will start writing pages until the zone is
balanced.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Tested-by: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Page reclaim at priority 0 will scan the entire LRU as priority 0 is
considered to be a near OOM condition. Kswapd can reach priority 0
quite easily if it is encountering a large number of pages it cannot
reclaim such as pages under writeback. When this happens, kswapd
reclaims very aggressively even though there may be no real risk of
allocation failure or OOM.This patch prevents kswapd reaching priority 0 and trying to reclaim the
world. Direct reclaimers will still reach priority 0 in the event of an
OOM situation.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Tested-by: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
In the past, kswapd makes a decision on whether to compact memory after
the pgdat was considered balanced. This more or less worked but it is
late to make such a decision and does not fit well now that kswapd makes
a decision whether to exit the zone scanning loop depending on reclaim
progress.This patch will compact a pgdat if at least the requested number of
pages were reclaimed from unbalanced zones for a given priority. If any
zone is currently balanced, kswapd will not call compaction as it is
expected the necessary pages are already available.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Tested-by: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
kswapd stops raising the scanning priority when at least
SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages have been reclaimed or the pgdat is considered
balanced. It then rechecks if it needs to restart at DEF_PRIORITY and
whether high-order reclaim needs to be reset. This is not wrong per-se
but it is confusing to follow and forcing kswapd to stay at DEF_PRIORITY
may require several restarts before it has scanned enough pages to meet
the high watermark even at 100% efficiency. This patch irons out the
logic a bit by controlling when priority is raised and removing the
"goto loop_again".This patch has kswapd raise the scanning priority until it is scanning
enough pages that it could meet the high watermark in one shrink of the
LRU lists if it is able to reclaim at 100% efficiency. It will not
raise the scanning prioirty higher unless it is failing to reclaim any
pages.To avoid infinite looping for high-order allocation requests kswapd will
not reclaim for high-order allocations when it has reclaimed at least
twice the number of pages as the allocation request.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Tested-by: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Simplistically, the anon and file LRU lists are scanned proportionally
depending on the value of vm.swappiness although there are other factors
taken into account by get_scan_count(). The patch "mm: vmscan: Limit
the number of pages kswapd reclaims" limits the number of pages kswapd
reclaims but it breaks this proportional scanning and may evenly shrink
anon/file LRUs regardless of vm.swappiness.This patch preserves the proportional scanning and reclaim. It does
mean that kswapd will reclaim more than requested but the number of
pages will be related to the high watermark.[mhocko@suse.cz: Correct proportional reclaim for memcg and simplify]
[kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com: Recalculate scan based on target]
[hannes@cmpxchg.org: Account for already scanned pages properly]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Tested-by: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This series does not fix all the current known problems with reclaim but
it addresses one important swapping bug when there is background IO.Changelog since V3
- Drop the slab shrink changes in light of Glaubers series and
discussions highlighted that there were a number of potential
problems with the patch. (mel)
- Rebased to 3.10-rc1Changelog since V2
- Preserve ratio properly for proportional scanning (kamezawa)Changelog since V1
- Rename ZONE_DIRTY to ZONE_TAIL_LRU_DIRTY (andi)
- Reformat comment in shrink_page_list (andi)
- Clarify some comments (dhillf)
- Rework how the proportional scanning is preserved
- Add PageReclaim check before kswapd starts writeback
- Reset sc.nr_reclaimed on every full zone scanKswapd and page reclaim behaviour has been screwy in one way or the
other for a long time. Very broadly speaking it worked in the far past
because machines were limited in memory so it did not have that many
pages to scan and it stalled congestion_wait() frequently to prevent it
going completely nuts. In recent times it has behaved very
unsatisfactorily with some of the problems compounded by the removal of
stall logic and the introduction of transparent hugepage support with
high-order reclaims.There are many variations of bugs that are rooted in this area. One
example is reports of a large copy operations or backup causing the
machine to grind to a halt or applications pushed to swap. Sometimes in
low memory situations a large percentage of memory suddenly gets
reclaimed. In other cases an application starts and kswapd hits 100%
CPU usage for prolonged periods of time and so on. There is now talk of
introducing features like an extra free kbytes tunable to work around
aspects of the problem instead of trying to deal with it. It's
compounded by the problem that it can be very workload and machine
specific.This series aims at addressing some of the worst of these problems
without attempting to fundmentally alter how page reclaim works.Patches 1-2 limits the number of pages kswapd reclaims while still obeying
the anon/file proportion of the LRUs it should be scanning.Patches 3-4 control how and when kswapd raises its scanning priority and
deletes the scanning restart logic which is tricky to follow.Patch 5 notes that it is too easy for kswapd to reach priority 0 when
scanning and then reclaim the world. Down with that sort of thing.Patch 6 notes that kswapd starts writeback based on scanning priority which
is not necessarily related to dirty pages. It will have kswapd
writeback pages if a number of unqueued dirty pages have been
recently encountered at the tail of the LRU.Patch 7 notes that sometimes kswapd should stall waiting on IO to complete
to reduce LRU churn and the likelihood that it'll reclaim young
clean pages or push applications to swap. It will cause kswapd
to block on IO if it detects that pages being reclaimed under
writeback are recycling through the LRU before the IO completes.Patchies 8-9 are cosmetic but balance_pgdat() is easier to follow after they
are applied.This was tested using memcached+memcachetest while some background IO
was in progress as implemented by the parallel IO tests implement in MM
Tests.memcachetest benchmarks how many operations/second memcached can service
and it is run multiple times. It starts with no background IO and then
re-runs the test with larger amounts of IO in the background to roughly
simulate a large copy in progress. The expectation is that the IO
should have little or no impact on memcachetest which is running
entirely in memory.3.10.0-rc1 3.10.0-rc1
vanilla lessdisrupt-v4
Ops memcachetest-0M 22155.00 ( 0.00%) 22180.00 ( 0.11%)
Ops memcachetest-715M 22720.00 ( 0.00%) 22355.00 ( -1.61%)
Ops memcachetest-2385M 3939.00 ( 0.00%) 23450.00 (495.33%)
Ops memcachetest-4055M 3628.00 ( 0.00%) 24341.00 (570.92%)
Ops io-duration-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops io-duration-715M 12.00 ( 0.00%) 7.00 ( 41.67%)
Ops io-duration-2385M 118.00 ( 0.00%) 21.00 ( 82.20%)
Ops io-duration-4055M 162.00 ( 0.00%) 36.00 ( 77.78%)
Ops swaptotal-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swaptotal-715M 140134.00 ( 0.00%) 18.00 ( 99.99%)
Ops swaptotal-2385M 392438.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swaptotal-4055M 449037.00 ( 0.00%) 27864.00 ( 93.79%)
Ops swapin-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-715M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-2385M 148031.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-4055M 135109.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops minorfaults-0M 1529984.00 ( 0.00%) 1530235.00 ( -0.02%)
Ops minorfaults-715M 1794168.00 ( 0.00%) 1613750.00 ( 10.06%)
Ops minorfaults-2385M 1739813.00 ( 0.00%) 1609396.00 ( 7.50%)
Ops minorfaults-4055M 1754460.00 ( 0.00%) 1614810.00 ( 7.96%)
Ops majorfaults-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops majorfaults-715M 185.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 2.70%)
Ops majorfaults-2385M 24472.00 ( 0.00%) 101.00 ( 99.59%)
Ops majorfaults-4055M 22302.00 ( 0.00%) 229.00 ( 98.97%)Note how the vanilla kernels performance collapses when there is enough
IO taking place in the background. This drop in performance is part of
what users complain of when they start backups. Note how the swapin and
major fault figures indicate that processes were being pushed to swap
prematurely. With the series applied, there is no noticable performance
drop and while there is still some swap activity, it's tiny.20 iterations of this test were run in total and averaged. Every 5
iterations, additional IO was generated in the background using dd to
measure how the workload was impacted. The 0M, 715M, 2385M and 4055M
subblock refer to the amount of IO going on in the background at each
iteration. So memcachetest-2385M is reporting how many
transactions/second memcachetest recorded on average over 5 iterations
while there was 2385M of IO going on in the ground. There are six
blocks of information reported herememcachetest is the transactions/second reported by memcachetest. In
the vanilla kernel note that performance drops from around
22K/sec to just under 4K/second when there is 2385M of IO going
on in the background. This is one type of performance collapse
users complain about if a large cp or backup starts in the
backgroundio-duration refers to how long it takes for the background IO to
complete. It's showing that with the patched kernel that the IO
completes faster while not interfering with the memcache
workloadswaptotal is the total amount of swap traffic. With the patched kernel,
the total amount of swapping is much reduced although it is
still not zero.swapin in this case is an indication as to whether we are swap trashing.
The closer the swapin/swapout ratio is to 1, the worse the
trashing is. Note with the patched kernel that there is no swapin
activity indicating that all the pages swapped were really inactive
unused pages.minorfaults are just minor faults. An increased number of minor faults
can indicate that page reclaim is unmapping the pages but not
swapping them out before they are faulted back in. With the
patched kernel, there is only a small change in minor faultsmajorfaults are just major faults in the target workload and a high
number can indicate that a workload is being prematurely
swapped. With the patched kernel, major faults are much reduced. As
there are no swapin's recorded so it's not being swapped. The likely
explanation is that that libraries or configuration files used by
the workload during startup get paged out by the background IO.Overall with the series applied, there is no noticable performance drop
due to background IO and while there is still some swap activity, it's
tiny and the lack of swapins imply that the swapped pages were inactive
and unused.3.10.0-rc1 3.10.0-rc1
vanilla lessdisrupt-v4
Page Ins 1234608 101892
Page Outs 12446272 11810468
Swap Ins 283406 0
Swap Outs 698469 27882
Direct pages scanned 0 136480
Kswapd pages scanned 6266537 5369364
Kswapd pages reclaimed 1088989 930832
Direct pages reclaimed 0 120901
Kswapd efficiency 17% 17%
Kswapd velocity 5398.371 4635.115
Direct efficiency 100% 88%
Direct velocity 0.000 117.817
Percentage direct scans 0% 2%
Page writes by reclaim 1655843 4009929
Page writes file 957374 3982047
Page writes anon 698469 27882
Page reclaim immediate 5245 1745
Page rescued immediate 0 0
Slabs scanned 33664 25216
Direct inode steals 0 0
Kswapd inode steals 19409 778
Kswapd skipped wait 0 0
THP fault alloc 35 30
THP collapse alloc 472 401
THP splits 27 22
THP fault fallback 0 0
THP collapse fail 0 1
Compaction stalls 0 4
Compaction success 0 0
Compaction failures 0 4
Page migrate success 0 0
Page migrate failure 0 0
Compaction pages isolated 0 0
Compaction migrate scanned 0 0
Compaction free scanned 0 0
Compaction cost 0 0
NUMA PTE updates 0 0
NUMA hint faults 0 0
NUMA hint local faults 0 0
NUMA pages migrated 0 0
AutoNUMA cost 0 0Unfortunately, note that there is a small amount of direct reclaim due to
kswapd no longer reclaiming the world. ftrace indicates that the direct
reclaim stalls are mostly harmless with the vast bulk of the stalls
incurred by dd23 tclsh-3367
38 memcachetest-13733
49 memcachetest-12443
57 tee-3368
1541 dd-13826
1981 dd-12539A consequence of the direct reclaim for dd is that the processes for the
IO workload may show a higher system CPU usage. There is also a risk that
kswapd not reclaiming the world may mean that it stays awake balancing
zones, does not stall on the appropriate events and continually scans
pages it cannot reclaim consuming CPU. This will be visible as continued
high CPU usage but in my own tests I only saw a single spike lasting less
than a second and I did not observe any problems related to reclaim while
running the series on my desktop.This patch:
The number of pages kswapd can reclaim is bound by the number of pages it
scans which is related to the size of the zone and the scanning priority.
In many cases the priority remains low because it's reset every
SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX reclaimed pages but in the event kswapd scans a large
number of pages it cannot reclaim, it will raise the priority and
potentially discard a large percentage of the zone as sc->nr_to_reclaim is
ULONG_MAX. The user-visible effect is a reclaim "spike" where a large
percentage of memory is suddenly freed. It would be bad enough if this
was just unused memory but because of how anon/file pages are balanced it
is possible that applications get pushed to swap unnecessarily.This patch limits the number of pages kswapd will reclaim to the high
watermark. Reclaim will still overshoot due to it not being a hard limit
as shrink_lruvec() will ignore the sc.nr_to_reclaim at DEF_PRIORITY but it
prevents kswapd reclaiming the world at higher priorities. The number of
pages it reclaims is not adjusted for high-order allocations as kswapd
will reclaim excessively if it is to balance zones for high-order
allocations.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks
Tested-by: Zlatko Calusic
Cc: dormando
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds