On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
...
> The __exception annotation on a function causes this to happen:
>
> [] (asm_do_IRQ+0x6c/0x8c) from []
> (__irq_svc+0x44/0xcc)
> Exception stack(0xc3897c78 to 0xc3897cc0)
> 7c60: 4022d320 4022e000
> 7c80: 08000075 00001000 c32273c0 c03ce1c0 c2b49b78 4022d000 c2b420b4 00000001
> 7ca0: 00000000 c3897cfc 00000000 c3897cc0 c00afc54 c002edd8 00000013 ffffffff
>
> Where that stack dump represents the pt_regs for the exception which
> happened. Any function found in while unwinding will cause this to
> be printed.
>
> If you insert a C function between the IRQ assembly and asm_do_IRQ,
> the
> dump you get from asm_do_IRQ will be the stack for your function,
> not
> the pt_regs. That makes the feature useless.
>
When __irq_svc - or any of the other exception handling assembly code -
calls the C code, the stack pointer will be pointing at the pt_regs
structure.
All the entry points into C code from the exception handling code are
marked with __exception or __exception_irq_enter to indicate that they
are one of the functions which has pt_regs above them.
Normally, when you've entered asm_do_IRQ() you will have this stack
layout (higher address towards top):
pt_regs
asm_do_IRQ frame
If you insert a C function between the exception assembly code and
asm_do_IRQ, you end up with this stack layout instead:
pt_regs
your function frame
asm_do_IRQ frame
This means when we unwind, we'll get to asm_do_IRQ, and rather than
dumping out the pt_regs, we'll dump out your functions stack frame
instead, because that's what is above the asm_do_IRQ stack frame
rather than the expected pt_regs structure.
The fix is to introduce handle_IRQ() for no exception stack dump, so
it can be called with MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER is selected and a C function
is between the assembly code and the actual IRQ handling code.
Signed-off-by: Russell King
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao
