10 Oct, 2014
3 commits
-
- get_vma_policy(task) is not safe if task != current, remove this
argument.- get_vma_policy() no longer has callers outside of mempolicy.c,
make it static.Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Alexander Viro
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman"
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov"
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Extract the code which looks for vma's policy from get_vma_policy()
into the new helper, __get_vma_policy(). Export get_task_policy().Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Alexander Viro
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman"
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov"
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
1. vma_policy_mof(task) is simply not safe unless task == current,
it can race with do_exit()->mpol_put(). Remove this arg and update
its single caller.2. vma can not be NULL, remove this check and simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Alexander Viro
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman"
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov"
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
05 Jun, 2014
1 commit
-
Currently hugepage migration is available for all archs which support
pmd-level hugepage, but testing is done only for x86_64 and there're
bugs for other archs. So to avoid breaking such archs, this patch
limits the availability strictly to x86_64 until developers of other
archs get interested in enabling this feature.Simply disabling hugepage migration on non-x86_64 archs is not enough to
fix the reported problem where sys_move_pages() hits the BUG_ON() in
follow_page(FOLL_GET), so let's fix this by checking if hugepage
migration is supported in vma_migratable().Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi
Reported-by: Michael Ellerman
Tested-by: Michael Ellerman
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Cc: Tony Luck
Cc: Russell King
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky
Cc: James Hogan
Cc: Ralf Baechle
Cc: David Miller
Cc: [3.12+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
08 Apr, 2014
2 commits
-
PF_MEMPOLICY is an unnecessary optimization for CONFIG_SLAB users.
There's no significant performance degradation to checking
current->mempolicy rather than current->flags & PF_MEMPOLICY in the
allocation path, especially since this is considered unlikely().Running TCP_RR with netperf-2.4.5 through localhost on 16 cpu machine with
64GB of memory and without a mempolicy:threads before after
16 1249409 1244487
32 1281786 1246783
48 1239175 1239138
64 1244642 1241841
80 1244346 1248918
96 1266436 1254316
112 1307398 1312135
128 1327607 1326502Per-process flags are a scarce resource so we should free them up whenever
possible and make them available. We'll be using it shortly for memcg oom
reserves.Signed-off-by: David Rientjes
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Tejun Heo
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Jianguo Wu
Cc: Tim Hockin
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
slab_node() is actually a mempolicy function, so rename it to
mempolicy_slab_node() to make it clearer that it used for processes with
mempolicies.At the same time, cleanup its code by saving numa_mem_id() in a local
variable (since we require a node with memory, not just any node) and
remove an obsolete comment that assumes the mempolicy is actually passed
into the function.Signed-off-by: David Rientjes
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Tejun Heo
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Jianguo Wu
Cc: Tim Hockin
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
22 Jan, 2014
1 commit
-
Mempolicies only exist for CONFIG_NUMA configurations. Therefore, a
certain class of functions are unneeded in configurations where
CONFIG_NUMA is disabled such as functions that duplicate existing
mempolicies, lookup existing policies, set certain mempolicy traits, or
test mempolicies for certain attributes.Remove the unneeded functions so that any future callers get a compile-
time error and protect their code with CONFIG_NUMA as required.Signed-off-by: David Rientjes
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
13 Nov, 2013
1 commit
-
mpol_to_str() should not fail. Currently, it either fails because the
string buffer is too small or because a string hasn't been defined for a
mempolicy mode.If a new mempolicy mode is introduced and no string is defined for it,
just warn and return "unknown".If the buffer is too small, just truncate the string and return, the
same behavior as snprintf().This also fixes a bug where there was no NULL-byte termination when doing
*p++ = '=' and *p++ ':' and maxlen has been reached.Signed-off-by: David Rientjes
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Chen Gang
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Dave Jones
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
09 Oct, 2013
1 commit
-
There is a 90% regression observed with a large Oracle performance test
on a 4 node system. Profiles indicated that the overhead was due to
contention on sp_lock when looking up shared memory policies. These
policies do not have the appropriate flags to allow them to be
automatically balanced so trapping faults on them is pointless. This
patch skips VMAs that do not have MPOL_F_MOF set.[riel@redhat.com: Initial patch]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Reported-and-tested-by: Joe Mario
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381141781-10992-32-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar
12 Sep, 2013
2 commits
-
Enable hugepage migration from migrate_pages(2), move_pages(2), and
mbind(2).Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Andi Kleen
Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Simple cleanup. Every user of vma_set_policy() does the same work, this
looks a bit annoying imho. And the new trivial helper which does
mpol_dup() + vma_set_policy() to simplify the callers.Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: David Rientjes
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
03 Jan, 2013
2 commits
-
Sasha was fuzzing with trinity and reported the following problem:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:269
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 6361, name: trinity-main
2 locks held by trinity-main/6361:
#0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [] __do_page_fault+0x1e4/0x4f0
#1: (&(&mm->page_table_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [] handle_pte_fault+0x3f7/0x6a0
Pid: 6361, comm: trinity-main Tainted: G W
3.7.0-rc2-next-20121024-sasha-00001-gd95ef01-dirty #74
Call Trace:
__might_sleep+0x1c3/0x1e0
mutex_lock_nested+0x29/0x50
mpol_shared_policy_lookup+0x2e/0x90
shmem_get_policy+0x2e/0x30
get_vma_policy+0x5a/0xa0
mpol_misplaced+0x41/0x1d0
handle_pte_fault+0x465/0x6a0This was triggered by a different version of automatic NUMA balancing
but in theory the current version is vunerable to the same problem.do_numa_page
-> numa_migrate_prep
-> mpol_misplaced
-> get_vma_policy
-> shmem_get_policyIt's very unlikely this will happen as shared pages are not marked
pte_numa -- see the page_mapcount() check in change_pte_range() -- but
it is possible.To address this, this patch restores sp->lock as originally implemented
by Kosaki Motohiro. In the path where get_vma_policy() is called, it
should not be calling sp_alloc() so it is not necessary to treat the PTL
specially.Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
Tested-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Remove the unused argument (formerly no_context) from mpol_parse_str()
and from mpol_to_str().Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
17 Dec, 2012
1 commit
-
Pull Automatic NUMA Balancing bare-bones from Mel Gorman:
"There are three implementations for NUMA balancing, this tree
(balancenuma), numacore which has been developed in tip/master and
autonuma which is in aa.git.In almost all respects balancenuma is the dumbest of the three because
its main impact is on the VM side with no attempt to be smart about
scheduling. In the interest of getting the ball rolling, it would be
desirable to see this much merged for 3.8 with the view to building
scheduler smarts on top and adapting the VM where required for 3.9.The most recent set of comparisons available from different people are
mel: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/9/108
mingo: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/7/331
tglx: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/437
srikar: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/397The results are a mixed bag. In my own tests, balancenuma does
reasonably well. It's dumb as rocks and does not regress against
mainline. On the other hand, Ingo's tests shows that balancenuma is
incapable of converging for this workloads driven by perf which is bad
but is potentially explained by the lack of scheduler smarts. Thomas'
results show balancenuma improves on mainline but falls far short of
numacore or autonuma. Srikar's results indicate we all suffer on a
large machine with imbalanced node sizes.My own testing showed that recent numacore results have improved
dramatically, particularly in the last week but not universally.
We've butted heads heavily on system CPU usage and high levels of
migration even when it shows that overall performance is better.
There are also cases where it regresses. Of interest is that for
specjbb in some configurations it will regress for lower numbers of
warehouses and show gains for higher numbers which is not reported by
the tool by default and sometimes missed in treports. Recently I
reported for numacore that the JVM was crashing with
NullPointerExceptions but currently it's unclear what the source of
this problem is. Initially I thought it was in how numacore batch
handles PTEs but I'm no longer think this is the case. It's possible
numacore is just able to trigger it due to higher rates of migration.These reports were quite late in the cycle so I/we would like to start
with this tree as it contains much of the code we can agree on and has
not changed significantly over the last 2-3 weeks."* tag 'balancenuma-v11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux-balancenuma: (50 commits)
mm/rmap, migration: Make rmap_walk_anon() and try_to_unmap_anon() more scalable
mm/rmap: Convert the struct anon_vma::mutex to an rwsem
mm: migrate: Account a transhuge page properly when rate limiting
mm: numa: Account for failed allocations and isolations as migration failures
mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case build fix
mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case.
mm: sched: numa: Delay PTE scanning until a task is scheduled on a new node
mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing if !SCHED_DEBUG
mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing
mm: sched: Adapt the scanning rate if a NUMA hinting fault does not migrate
mm: numa: Use a two-stage filter to restrict pages being migrated for unlikely tasknode relationships
mm: numa: migrate: Set last_nid on newly allocated page
mm: numa: split_huge_page: Transfer last_nid on tail page
mm: numa: Introduce last_nid to the page frame
sched: numa: Slowly increase the scanning period as NUMA faults are handled
mm: numa: Rate limit setting of pte_numa if node is saturated
mm: numa: Rate limit the amount of memory that is migrated between nodes
mm: numa: Structures for Migrate On Fault per NUMA migration rate limiting
mm: numa: Migrate pages handled during a pmd_numa hinting fault
mm: numa: Migrate on reference policy
...
11 Dec, 2012
1 commit
-
This patch provides a new function to test whether a page resides
on a node that is appropriate for the mempolicy for the vma and
address where the page is supposed to be mapped. This involves
looking up the node where the page belongs. So, the function
returns that node so that it may be used to allocated the page
without consulting the policy again.A subsequent patch will call this function from the fault path.
Because of this, I don't want to go ahead and allocate the page, e.g.,
via alloc_page_vma() only to have to free it if it has the correct
policy. So, I just mimic the alloc_page_vma() node computation
logic--sort of.Note: we could use this function to implement a MPOL_MF_STRICT
behavior when migrating pages to match mbind() mempolicy--e.g.,
to ensure that pages in an interleaved range are reinterleaved
rather than left where they are when they reside on any page in
the interleave nodemask.Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Andrew Morton
Cc: Linus Torvalds
[ Added MPOL_F_LAZY to trigger migrate-on-fault;
simplified code now that we don't have to bother
with special crap for interleaved ]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
07 Dec, 2012
1 commit
-
This fixes a regression in 3.7-rc, which has since gone into stable.
Commit 00442ad04a5e ("mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount
imbalance in alloc_pages_vma()") changed get_vma_policy() to raise the
refcount on a shmem shared mempolicy; whereas shmem_alloc_page() went
on expecting alloc_page_vma() to drop the refcount it had acquired.
This deserves a rework: but for now fix the leak in shmem_alloc_page().Hugh: shmem_swapin() did not need a fix, but surely it's clearer to use
the same refcounting there as in shmem_alloc_page(), delete its onstack
mempolicy, and the strange mpol_cond_copy() and __mpol_cond_copy() -
those were invented to let swapin_readahead() make an unknown number of
calls to alloc_pages_vma() with one mempolicy; but since 00442ad04a5e,
alloc_pages_vma() has kept refcount in balance, so now no problem.Reported-and-tested-by: Tommi Rantala
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
13 Oct, 2012
1 commit
-
Signed-off-by: David Howells
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner
Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney
Acked-by: Dave Jones
09 Oct, 2012
2 commits
-
shared_policy_replace() use of sp_alloc() is unsafe. 1) sp_node cannot
be dereferenced if sp->lock is not held and 2) another thread can modify
sp_node between spin_unlock for allocating a new sp node and next
spin_lock. The bug was introduced before 2.6.12-rc2.Kosaki's original patch for this problem was to allocate an sp node and
policy within shared_policy_replace and initialise it when the lock is
reacquired. I was not keen on this approach because it partially
duplicates sp_alloc(). As the paths were sp->lock is taken are not that
performance critical this patch converts sp->lock to sp->mutex so it can
sleep when calling sp_alloc().[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: Original patch]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Josh Boyer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
A long time ago, in v2.4, VM_RESERVED kept swapout process off VMA,
currently it lost original meaning but still has some effects:| effect | alternative flags
-+------------------------+---------------------------------------------
1| account as reserved_vm | VM_IO
2| skip in core dump | VM_IO, VM_DONTDUMP
3| do not merge or expand | VM_IO, VM_DONTEXPAND, VM_HUGETLB, VM_PFNMAP
4| do not mlock | VM_IO, VM_DONTEXPAND, VM_HUGETLB, VM_PFNMAPThis patch removes reserved_vm counter from mm_struct. Seems like nobody
cares about it, it does not exported into userspace directly, it only
reduces total_vm showed in proc.Thus VM_RESERVED can be replaced with VM_IO or pair VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP.
remap_pfn_range() and io_remap_pfn_range() set VM_IO|VM_DONTEXPAND|VM_DONTDUMP.
remap_vmalloc_range() set VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c fixup]
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov
Cc: Alexander Viro
Cc: Carsten Otte
Cc: Chris Metcalf
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov
Cc: Eric Paris
Cc: H. Peter Anvin
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Ingo Molnar
Cc: James Morris
Cc: Jason Baron
Cc: Kentaro Takeda
Cc: Matt Helsley
Cc: Nick Piggin
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Robert Richter
Cc: Suresh Siddha
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
20 Jun, 2012
1 commit
-
slab_node() could access current->mempolicy from interrupt context.
However there's a race condition during exit where the mempolicy
is first freed and then the pointer zeroed.Using this from interrupts seems bogus anyways. The interrupt
will interrupt a random process and therefore get a random
mempolicy. Many times, this will be idle's, which noone can change.Just disable this here and always use local for slab
from interrupts. I also cleaned up the callers of slab_node a bit
which always passed the same argument.I believe the original mempolicy code did that in fact,
so it's likely a regression.v2: send version with correct logic
v3: simplify. fix typo.
Reported-by: Arun Sharma
Cc: penberg@kernel.org
Cc: cl@linux.com
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen
[tdmackey@twitter.com: Rework control flow based on feedback from
cl@linux.com, fix logic, and cleanup current task_struct reference]
Acked-by: David Rientjes
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
Signed-off-by: David Mackey
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg
30 May, 2012
1 commit
-
s/from_nodes/from and s/to_nodes/to/. The "_nodes" is redundant - it
duplicates the argument's type.Done in a fit of irritation over 80-col issues :(
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Larry Woodman
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
11 Jan, 2012
1 commit
-
mpol_equal() logically returns a boolean. Use a bool type to slightly
improve readability.Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Stephen Wilson
Acked-by: David Rientjes
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
25 May, 2011
2 commits
-
When CONFIG_TMPFS=n mpol_to_str() is not declared in mempolicy.h.
However, in the NUMA case, the definition is always compiled.Since it is not strictly true that tmpfs is the only client, and since the
symbol was always lurking around anyways, export mpol_to_str()
unconditionally. Furthermore, this will allow us to move show_numa_map()
out of mempolicy.c and into the procfs subsystem.Signed-off-by: Stephen Wilson
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Randy Dunlap
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
In commit 48fce3429d ("mempolicies: unexport get_vma_policy()")
get_vma_policy() was marked static as all clients were local to
mempolicy.c.However, the decision to generate /proc/pid/numa_maps in the numa memory
policy code and outside the procfs subsystem introduces an artificial
interdependency between the two systems. Exporting get_vma_policy() once
again is the first step to clean up this interdependency.Signed-off-by: Stephen Wilson
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
10 Aug, 2010
1 commit
-
The oom killer presently kills current whenever there is no more memory
free or reclaimable on its mempolicy's nodes. There is no guarantee that
current is a memory-hogging task or that killing it will free any
substantial amount of memory, however.In such situations, it is better to scan the tasklist for nodes that are
allowed to allocate on current's set of nodes and kill the task with the
highest badness() score. This ensures that the most memory-hogging task,
or the one configured by the user with /proc/pid/oom_adj, is always
selected in such scenarios.Signed-off-by: David Rientjes
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
25 May, 2010
1 commit
-
Nick Piggin reported that the allocator may see an empty nodemask when
changing cpuset's mems[1]. It happens only on the kernel that do not do
atomic nodemask_t stores. (MAX_NUMNODES > BITS_PER_LONG)But I found that there is also a problem on the kernel that can do atomic
nodemask_t stores. The problem is that the allocator can't find a node to
alloc page when changing cpuset's mems though there is a lot of free
memory. The reason is like this:(mpol: mempolicy)
task1 task1's mpol task2
alloc page 1
alloc on node0? NO 1
1 change mems from 1 to 0
1 rebind task1's mpol
0-1 set new bits
0 clear disallowed bits
alloc on node1? NO 0
...
can't alloc page
goto oomI can use the attached program reproduce it by the following step:
# mkdir /dev/cpuset
# mount -t cpuset cpuset /dev/cpuset
# mkdir /dev/cpuset/1
# echo `cat /dev/cpuset/cpus` > /dev/cpuset/1/cpus
# echo `cat /dev/cpuset/mems` > /dev/cpuset/1/mems
# echo $$ > /dev/cpuset/1/tasks
# numactl --membind=`cat /dev/cpuset/mems` ./cpuset_mem_hog &
= max(nr_cpus - 1, 1)
# killall -s SIGUSR1 cpuset_mem_hog
# ./change_mems.shseveral hours later, oom will happen though there is a lot of free memory.
This patchset fixes this problem by expanding the nodes range first(set
newly allowed bits) and shrink it lazily(clear newly disallowed bits). So
we use a variable to tell the write-side task that read-side task is
reading nodemask, and the write-side task clears newly disallowed nodes
after read-side task ends the current memory allocation.This patch:
In order to fix no node to alloc memory, when we want to update mempolicy
and mems_allowed, we expand the set of nodes first (set all the newly
nodes) and shrink the set of nodes lazily(clean disallowed nodes), But the
mempolicy's rebind functions may breaks the expanding.So we restructure the mempolicy's rebind functions and split the rebind
work to two steps, just like the update of cpuset's mems: The 1st step:
expand the set of the mempolicy's nodes. The 2nd step: shrink the set of
the mempolicy's nodes. It is used when there is no real lock to protect
the mempolicy in the read-side. Otherwise we can do rebind work at once.In order to implement it, we define
enum mpol_rebind_step {
MPOL_REBIND_ONCE,
MPOL_REBIND_STEP1,
MPOL_REBIND_STEP2,
MPOL_REBIND_NSTEP,
};If the mempolicy needn't be updated by two steps, we can pass
MPOL_REBIND_ONCE to the rebind functions. Or we can pass
MPOL_REBIND_STEP1 to do the first step of the rebind work and pass
MPOL_REBIND_STEP2 to do the second step work.Besides that, it maybe long time between these two step and we have to
release the lock that protects mempolicy and mems_allowed. If we hold the
lock once again, we must check whether the current mempolicy is under the
rebinding (the first step has been done) or not, because the task may
alloc a new mempolicy when we don't hold the lock. So we defined the
following flag to identify it:#define MPOL_F_REBINDING (1 << 2)
The new functions will be used in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Nick Piggin
Cc: Paul Menage
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Ravikiran Thirumalai
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
16 Dec, 2009
1 commit
-
This patch derives a "nodes_allowed" node mask from the numa mempolicy of
the task modifying the number of persistent huge pages to control the
allocation, freeing and adjusting of surplus huge pages when the pool page
count is modified via the new sysctl or sysfs attribute
"nr_hugepages_mempolicy". The nodes_allowed mask is derived as follows:* For "default" [NULL] task mempolicy, a NULL nodemask_t pointer
is produced. This will cause the hugetlb subsystem to use
node_online_map as the "nodes_allowed". This preserves the
behavior before this patch.
* For "preferred" mempolicy, including explicit local allocation,
a nodemask with the single preferred node will be produced.
"local" policy will NOT track any internode migrations of the
task adjusting nr_hugepages.
* For "bind" and "interleave" policy, the mempolicy's nodemask
will be used.
* Other than to inform the construction of the nodes_allowed node
mask, the actual mempolicy mode is ignored. That is, all modes
behave like interleave over the resulting nodes_allowed mask
with no "fallback".See the updated documentation [next patch] for more information
about the implications of this patch.Examples:
Starting with:
Node 0 HugePages_Total: 0
Node 1 HugePages_Total: 0
Node 2 HugePages_Total: 0
Node 3 HugePages_Total: 0Default behavior [with or without this patch] balances persistent
hugepage allocation across nodes [with sufficient contiguous memory]:sysctl vm.nr_hugepages[_mempolicy]=32
yields:
Node 0 HugePages_Total: 8
Node 1 HugePages_Total: 8
Node 2 HugePages_Total: 8
Node 3 HugePages_Total: 8Of course, we only have nr_hugepages_mempolicy with the patch,
but with default mempolicy, nr_hugepages_mempolicy behaves the
same as nr_hugepages.Applying mempolicy--e.g., with numactl [using '-m' a.k.a.
'--membind' because it allows multiple nodes to be specified
and it's easy to type]--we can allocate huge pages on
individual nodes or sets of nodes. So, starting from the
condition above, with 8 huge pages per node, add 8 more to
node 2 using:numactl -m 2 sysctl vm.nr_hugepages_mempolicy=40
This yields:
Node 0 HugePages_Total: 8
Node 1 HugePages_Total: 8
Node 2 HugePages_Total: 16
Node 3 HugePages_Total: 8The incremental 8 huge pages were restricted to node 2 by the
specified mempolicy.Similarly, we can use mempolicy to free persistent huge pages
from specified nodes:numactl -m 0,1 sysctl vm.nr_hugepages_mempolicy=32
yields:
Node 0 HugePages_Total: 4
Node 1 HugePages_Total: 4
Node 2 HugePages_Total: 16
Node 3 HugePages_Total: 8The 8 huge pages freed were balanced over nodes 0 and 1.
[rientjes@google.com: accomodate reworked NODEMASK_ALLOC]
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn
Acked-by: Mel Gorman
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Randy Dunlap
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan
Cc: Adam Litke
Cc: Andy Whitcroft
Cc: Eric Whitney
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
25 Jul, 2008
1 commit
-
We'd like to support CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE on s390, which depends on
CONFIG_MIGRATION. So far, CONFIG_MIGRATION is only available with NUMA
support.This patch makes CONFIG_MIGRATION selectable for architectures that define
ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE. When MIGRATION is enabled w/o NUMA, the
kernel won't compile because migrate_vmas() does not know about
vm_ops->migrate() and vma_migratable() does not know about policy_zone.
To fix this, those two functions can be restricted to '#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA'
because they are not being used w/o NUMA. vma_migratable() is moved over
from migrate.h to mempolicy.h.[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix]
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky
Cc: Heiko Carstens
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motorhiro
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
28 Apr, 2008
12 commits
-
This patch replaces the mempolicy mode, mode_flags, and nodemask in the
shmem_sb_info struct with a struct mempolicy pointer, initialized to NULL.
This removes dependency on the details of mempolicy from shmem.c and hugetlbfs
inode.c and simplifies the interfaces.mpol_parse_str() in mempolicy.c is changed to return, via a pointer to a
pointer arg, a struct mempolicy pointer on success. For MPOL_DEFAULT, the
returned pointer is NULL. Further, mpol_parse_str() now takes a 'no_context'
argument that causes the input nodemask to be stored in the w.user_nodemask of
the created mempolicy for use when the mempolicy is installed in a tmpfs inode
shared policy tree. At that time, any cpuset contextualization is applied to
the original input nodemask. This preserves the previous behavior where the
input nodemask was stored in the superblock. We can think of the returned
mempolicy as "context free".Because mpol_parse_str() is now calling mpol_new(), we can remove from
mpol_to_str() the semantic checks that mpol_new() already performs.Add 'no_context' parameter to mpol_to_str() to specify that it should format
the nodemask in w.user_nodemask for 'bind' and 'interleave' policies.Change mpol_shared_policy_init() to take a pointer to a "context free" struct
mempolicy and to create a new, "contextualized" mempolicy using the mode,
mode_flags and user_nodemask from the input mempolicy.Note: we know that the mempolicy passed to mpol_to_str() or
mpol_shared_policy_init() from a tmpfs superblock is "context free". This
is currently the only instance thereof. However, if we found more uses for
this concept, and introduced any ambiguity as to whether a mempolicy was
context free or not, we could add another internal mode flag to identify
context free mempolicies. Then, we could remove the 'no_context' argument
from mpol_to_str().Added shmem_get_sbmpol() to return a reference counted superblock mempolicy,
if one exists, to pass to mpol_shared_policy_init(). We must add the
reference under the sb stat_lock to prevent races with replacement of the mpol
by remount. This reference is removed in mpol_shared_policy_init().[akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fix]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: another build fix]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: yet another build fix]
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
mm/shmem.c currently contains functions to parse and display memory policy
strings for the tmpfs 'mpol' mount option. Move this to mm/mempolicy.c with
the rest of the mempolicy support. With subsequent patches, we'll be able to
remove knowledge of the details [mode, flags, policy, ...] completely from
shmem.c1) replace shmem_parse_mpol() in mm/shmem.c with mpol_parse_str() in
mm/mempolicy.c. Rework to use the policy_types[] array [used by
mpol_to_str()] to look up mode by name.2) use mpol_to_str() to format policy for shmem_show_mpol(). mpol_to_str()
expects a pointer to a struct mempolicy, so temporarily construct one.
This will be replaced with a reference to a struct mempolicy in the tmpfs
superblock in a subsequent patch.NOTE 1: I changed mpol_to_str() to use a colon ':' rather than an equal
sign '=' as the nodemask delimiter to match mpol_parse_str() and the
tmpfs/shmem mpol mount option formatting that now uses mpol_to_str(). This
is a user visible change to numa_maps, but then the addition of the mode
flags already changed the display. It makes sense to me to have the mounts
and numa_maps display the policy in the same format. However, if anyone
objects strongly, I can pass the desired nodemask delimeter as an arg to
mpol_to_str().Note 2: Like show_numa_map(), I don't check the return code from
mpol_to_str(). I do use a longer buffer than the one provided by
show_numa_map(), which seems to have sufficed so far.Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Now that we're using "preferred local" policy for system default, we need to
make this as fast as possible. Because of the variable size of the mempolicy
structure [based on size of nodemasks], the preferred_node may be in a
different cacheline from the mode. This can result in accessing an extra
cacheline in the normal case of system default policy. Suspect this is the
cause of an observed 2-3% slowdown in page fault testing relative to kernel
without this patch series.To alleviate this, use an internal mode flag, MPOL_F_LOCAL in the mempolicy
flags member which is guaranteed [?] to be in the same cacheline as the mode
itself.Verified that reworked mempolicy now performs slightly better on 25-rc8-mm1
for both anon and shmem segments with system default and vma [preferred local]
policy.Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
After further discussion with Christoph Lameter, it has become clear that my
earlier attempts to clean up the mempolicy reference counting were a bit of
overkill in some areas, resulting in superflous ref/unref in what are usually
fast paths. In other areas, further inspection reveals that I botched the
unref for interleave policies.A separate patch, suitable for upstream/stable trees, fixes up the known
errors in the previous attempt to fix reference counting.This patch reworks the memory policy referencing counting and, one hopes,
simplifies the code. Maybe I'll get it right this time.See the update to the numa_memory_policy.txt document for a discussion of
memory policy reference counting that motivates this patch.Summary:
Lookup of mempolicy, based on (vma, address) need only add a reference for
shared policy, and we need only unref the policy when finished for shared
policies. So, this patch backs out all of the unneeded extra reference
counting added by my previous attempt. It then unrefs only shared policies
when we're finished with them, using the mpol_cond_put() [conditional put]
helper function introduced by this patch.Note that shmem_swapin() calls read_swap_cache_async() with a dummy vma
containing just the policy. read_swap_cache_async() can call alloc_page_vma()
multiple times, so we can't let alloc_page_vma() unref the shared policy in
this case. To avoid this, we make a copy of any non-null shared policy and
remove the MPOL_F_SHARED flag from the copy. This copy occurs before reading
a page [or multiple pages] from swap, so the overhead should not be an issue
here.I introduced a new static inline function "mpol_cond_copy()" to copy the
shared policy to an on-stack policy and remove the flags that would require a
conditional free. The current implementation of mpol_cond_copy() assumes that
the struct mempolicy contains no pointers to dynamically allocated structures
that must be duplicated or reference counted during copy.Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
As part of yet another rework of mempolicy reference counting, we want to be
able to identify shared policies efficiently, because they have an extra ref
taken on lookup that needs to be removed when we're finished using the policy.Note: the extra ref is required because the policies are
shared between tasks/processes and can be changed/freed
by one task while another task is using them--e.g., for
page allocation.Building on David Rientjes mempolicy "mode flags" enhancement, this patch
indicates a "shared" policy by setting a new MPOL_F_SHARED flag in the flags
member of the struct mempolicy added by David. MPOL_F_SHARED, and any future
"internal mode flags" are reserved from bit zero up, as they will never be
passed in the upper bits of the mode argument of a mempolicy API.I set the MPOL_F_SHARED flag when the policy is installed in the shared policy
rb-tree. Don't need/want to clear the flag when removing from the tree as the
mempolicy is freed [unref'd] internally to the sp_delete() function. However,
a task could hold another reference on this mempolicy from a prior lookup. We
need the MPOL_F_SHARED flag to stay put so that any tasks holding a ref will
unref, eventually freeing, the mempolicy.A later patch in this series will introduce a function to conditionally unref
[mpol_free] a policy. The MPOL_F_SHARED flag is one reason [currently the
only reason] to unref/free a policy via the conditional free.Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The terms 'policy' and 'mode' are both used in various places to describe the
semantics of the value stored in the 'policy' member of struct mempolicy.
Furthermore, the term 'policy' is used to refer to that member, to the entire
struct mempolicy and to the more abstract concept of the tuple consisting of a
"mode" and an optional node or set of nodes. Recently, we have added "mode
flags" that are passed in the upper bits of the 'mode' [or sometimes,
'policy'] member of the numa APIs.I'd like to resolve this confusion, which perhaps only exists in my mind, by
renaming the 'policy' member to 'mode' throughout, and fixing up the
Documentation. Man pages will be updated separately.Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This patch renames mpol_copy() to mpol_dup() because, well, that's what it
does. Like, e.g., strdup() for strings, mpol_dup() takes a pointer to an
existing mempolicy, allocates a new one and copies the contents.In a later patch, I want to use the name mpol_copy() to copy the contents from
one mempolicy to another like, e.g., strcpy() does for strings.Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This is a change that was requested some time ago by Mel Gorman. Makes sense
to me, so here it is.Note: I retain the name "mpol_free_shared_policy()" because it actually does
free the shared_policy, which is NOT a reference counted object. However, ...The mempolicy object[s] referenced by the shared_policy are reference counted,
so mpol_put() is used to release the reference held by the shared_policy. The
mempolicy might not be freed at this time, because some task attached to the
shared object associated with the shared policy may be in the process of
allocating a page based on the mempolicy. In that case, the task performing
the allocation will hold a reference on the mempolicy, obtained via
mpol_shared_policy_lookup(). The mempolicy will be freed when all tasks
holding such a reference have called mpol_put() for the mempolicy.Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Removes forward definition of vm_area_struct in linux/mempolicy.h. We already
get it from the linux/slab.h -> linux/gfp.h include.Removes the unused mpol_set_vma_default() macro from linux/mempolicy.h.
Removes the extern definition of default_policy since it is only referenced,
as it should be, in mm/mempolicy.c.Cc: Paul Jackson
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Adds another optional mode flag, MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES, that specifies
nodemasks passed via set_mempolicy() or mbind() should be considered relative
to the current task's mems_allowed.When the mempolicy is created, the passed nodemask is folded and mapped onto
the current task's mems_allowed. For example, consider a task using
set_mempolicy() to pass MPOL_INTERLEAVE | MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES with a
nodemask of 1-3. If current's mems_allowed is 4-7, the effected nodemask is
5-7 (the second, third, and fourth node of mems_allowed).If the same task is attached to a cpuset, the mempolicy nodemask is rebound
each time the mems are changed. Some possible rebinds and results are:mems result
1-3 1-3
1-7 2-4
1,5-6 1,5-6
1,5-7 5-7Likewise, the zonelist built for MPOL_BIND acts on the set of zones assigned
to the resultant nodemask from the relative remap.In the MPOL_PREFERRED case, the preferred node is remapped from the currently
effected nodemask to the relative nodemask.This mempolicy mode flag was conceived of by Paul Jackson .
Cc: Paul Jackson
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Add an optional mempolicy mode flag, MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES, that suppresses the
node remap when the policy is rebound.Adds another member to struct mempolicy, nodemask_t user_nodemask, as part of
a union with cpuset_mems_allowed:struct mempolicy {
...
union {
nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed;
nodemask_t user_nodemask;
} w;
}that stores the the nodemask that the user passed when he or she created the
mempolicy via set_mempolicy() or mbind(). When using MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES,
which is passed with any mempolicy mode, the user's passed nodemask
intersected with the VMA or task's allowed nodes is always used when
determining the preferred node, setting the MPOL_BIND zonelist, or creating
the interleave nodemask. This happens whenever the policy is rebound,
including when a task's cpuset assignment changes or the cpuset's mems are
changed.This creates an interesting side-effect in that it allows the mempolicy
"intent" to lie dormant and uneffected until it has access to the node(s) that
it desires. For example, if you currently ask for an interleaved policy over
a set of nodes that you do not have access to, the mempolicy is not created
and the task continues to use the previous policy. With this change, however,
it is possible to create the same mempolicy; it is only effected when access
to nodes in the nodemask is acquired.It is also possible to mount tmpfs with the static nodemask behavior when
specifying a node or nodemask. To do this, simply add "=static" immediately
following the mempolicy mode at mount time:mount -o remount mpol=interleave=static:1-3
Also removes mpol_check_policy() and folds its logic into mpol_new() since it
is now obsoleted. The unused vma_mpol_equal() is also removed.Cc: Paul Jackson
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
With the evolution of mempolicies, it is necessary to support mempolicy mode
flags that specify how the policy shall behave in certain circumstances. The
most immediate need for mode flag support is to suppress remapping the
nodemask of a policy at the time of rebind.Both the mempolicy mode and flags are passed by the user in the 'int policy'
formal of either the set_mempolicy() or mbind() syscall. A new constant,
MPOL_MODE_FLAGS, represents the union of legal optional flags that may be
passed as part of this int. Mempolicies that include illegal flags as part of
their policy are rejected as invalid.An additional member to struct mempolicy is added to support the mode flags:
struct mempolicy {
...
unsigned short policy;
unsigned short flags;
}The splitting of the 'int' actual passed by the user is done in
sys_set_mempolicy() and sys_mbind() for their respective syscalls. This is
done by intersecting the actual with MPOL_MODE_FLAGS, rejecting the syscall of
there are additional flags, and storing it in the new 'flags' member of struct
mempolicy. The intersection of the actual with ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS is stored in
the 'policy' member of the struct and all current users of pol->policy remain
unchanged.The union of the policy mode and optional mode flags is passed back to the
user in get_mempolicy().This combination of mode and flags within the same actual does not break
userspace code that relies on get_mempolicy(&policy, ...) and eitherswitch (policy) {
case MPOL_BIND:
...
case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
...
};statements or
if (policy == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
...
}statements. Such applications would need to use optional mode flags when
calling set_mempolicy() or mbind() for these previously implemented statements
to stop working. If an application does start using optional mode flags, it
will need to mask the optional flags off the policy in switch and conditional
statements that only test mode.An additional member is also added to struct shmem_sb_info to store the
optional mode flags.[hugh@veritas.com: shmem mpol: fix build warning]
Cc: Paul Jackson
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds