27 Jul, 2011
4 commits
-
The commit log of 0ae5e89c60c9 ("memcg: count the soft_limit reclaim
in...") says it adds scanning stats to memory.stat file. But it doesn't
because we considered we needed to make a concensus for such new APIs.This patch is a trial to add memory.scan_stat. This shows
- the number of scanned pages(total, anon, file)
- the number of rotated pages(total, anon, file)
- the number of freed pages(total, anon, file)
- the number of elaplsed time (including sleep/pause time)for both of direct/soft reclaim.
The biggest difference with oringinal Ying's one is that this file
can be reset by some write, as# echo 0 ...../memory.scan_stat
Example of output is here. This is a result after make -j 6 kernel
under 300M limit.[kamezawa@bluextal ~]$ cat /cgroup/memory/A/memory.scan_stat
[kamezawa@bluextal ~]$ cat /cgroup/memory/A/memory.vmscan_stat
scanned_pages_by_limit 9471864
scanned_anon_pages_by_limit 6640629
scanned_file_pages_by_limit 2831235
rotated_pages_by_limit 4243974
rotated_anon_pages_by_limit 3971968
rotated_file_pages_by_limit 272006
freed_pages_by_limit 2318492
freed_anon_pages_by_limit 962052
freed_file_pages_by_limit 1356440
elapsed_ns_by_limit 351386416101
scanned_pages_by_system 0
scanned_anon_pages_by_system 0
scanned_file_pages_by_system 0
rotated_pages_by_system 0
rotated_anon_pages_by_system 0
rotated_file_pages_by_system 0
freed_pages_by_system 0
freed_anon_pages_by_system 0
freed_file_pages_by_system 0
elapsed_ns_by_system 0
scanned_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 9471864
scanned_anon_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 6640629
scanned_file_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 2831235
rotated_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 4243974
rotated_anon_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 3971968
rotated_file_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 272006
freed_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 2318492
freed_anon_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 962052
freed_file_pages_by_limit_under_hierarchy 1356440
elapsed_ns_by_limit_under_hierarchy 351386416101
scanned_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
scanned_anon_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
scanned_file_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
rotated_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
rotated_anon_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
rotated_file_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
freed_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
freed_anon_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
freed_file_pages_by_system_under_hierarchy 0
elapsed_ns_by_system_under_hierarchy 0total_xxxx is for hierarchy management.
This will be useful for further memcg developments and need to be
developped before we do some complicated rework on LRU/softlimit
management.This patch adds a new struct memcg_scanrecord into scan_control struct.
sc->nr_scanned at el is not designed for exporting information. For
example, nr_scanned is reset frequentrly and incremented +2 at scanning
mapped pages.To avoid complexity, I added a new param in scan_control which is for
exporting scanning score.Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Ying Han
Cc: Andrew Bresticker
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Commit 246e87a93934 ("memcg: fix get_scan_count() for small targets")
fixes the memcg/kswapd behavior against small targets and prevent vmscan
priority too high.But the implementation is too naive and adds another problem to small
memcg. It always force scan to 32 pages of file/anon and doesn't handle
swappiness and other rotate_info. It makes vmscan to scan anon LRU
regardless of swappiness and make reclaim bad. This patch fixes it by
adjusting scanning count with regard to swappiness at el.At a test "cat 1G file under 300M limit." (swappiness=20)
before patch
scanned_pages_by_limit 360919
scanned_anon_pages_by_limit 180469
scanned_file_pages_by_limit 180450
rotated_pages_by_limit 31
rotated_anon_pages_by_limit 25
rotated_file_pages_by_limit 6
freed_pages_by_limit 180458
freed_anon_pages_by_limit 19
freed_file_pages_by_limit 180439
elapsed_ns_by_limit 429758872
after patch
scanned_pages_by_limit 180674
scanned_anon_pages_by_limit 24
scanned_file_pages_by_limit 180650
rotated_pages_by_limit 35
rotated_anon_pages_by_limit 24
rotated_file_pages_by_limit 11
freed_pages_by_limit 180634
freed_anon_pages_by_limit 0
freed_file_pages_by_limit 180634
elapsed_ns_by_limit 367119089
scanned_pages_by_system 0the numbers of scanning anon are decreased(as expected), and elapsed time
reduced. By this patch, small memcgs will work better.
(*) Because the amount of file-cache is much bigger than anon,
recalaim_stat's rotate-scan counter make scanning files more.Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Ying Han
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
In mm/memcontrol.c, there are many lru stat functions as..
mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages
mem_cgroup_node_nr_file_lru_pages
mem_cgroup_nr_file_lru_pages
mem_cgroup_node_nr_anon_lru_pages
mem_cgroup_nr_anon_lru_pages
mem_cgroup_node_nr_unevictable_lru_pages
mem_cgroup_nr_unevictable_lru_pages
mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages
mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages
mem_cgroup_get_local_zonestatSome of them are under #ifdef MAX_NUMNODES >1 and others are not.
This seems bad. This patch consolidates all functions intomem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages()
mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages()
mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages()For these functions, "which LRU?" information is passed by a mask.
example:
mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(mem, BIT(LRU_ACTIVE_ANON))And I added some macro as ALL_LRU, ALL_LRU_FILE, ALL_LRU_ANON.
example:
mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(mem, ALL_LRU)BTW, considering layout of NUMA memory placement of counters, this patch seems
to be better.Now, when we gather all LRU information, we scan in following orer
for_each_lru -> for_each_node -> for_each_zone.This means we'll touch cache lines in different node in turn.
After patch, we'll scan
for_each_node -> for_each_zone -> for_each_lru(mask)Then, we'll gather information in the same cacheline at once.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warnigns, build error]
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura
Cc: Balbir Singh
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Ying Han
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Each memory cgroup has a 'swappiness' value which can be accessed by
get_swappiness(memcg). The major user is try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages()
and swappiness is passed by argument. It's propagated by scan_control.get_swappiness() is a static function but some planned updates will need
to get swappiness from files other than memcontrol.c This patch exports
get_swappiness() as mem_cgroup_swappiness(). With this, we can remove the
argument of swapiness from try_to_free... and drop swappiness from
scan_control. only memcg uses it.Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura
Cc: Balbir Singh
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Ying Han
Cc: Shaohua Li
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
20 Jul, 2011
5 commits
-
For shrinkers that have their own cond_resched* calls, having
shrink_slab break the work down into small batches is not
paticularly efficient. Add a custom batchsize field to the struct
shrinker so that shrinkers can use a larger batch size if they
desire.A value of zero (uninitialised) means "use the default", so
behaviour is unchanged by this patch.Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner
Signed-off-by: Al Viro -
When a shrinker returns -1 to shrink_slab() to indicate it cannot do
any work given the current memory reclaim requirements, it adds the
entire total_scan count to shrinker->nr. The idea ehind this is that
whenteh shrinker is next called and can do work, it will do the work
of the previously aborted shrinker call as well.However, if a filesystem is doing lots of allocation with GFP_NOFS
set, then we get many, many more aborts from the shrinkers than we
do successful calls. The result is that shrinker->nr winds up to
it's maximum permissible value (twice the current cache size) and
then when the next shrinker call that can do work is issued, it
has enough scan count built up to free the entire cache twice over.This manifests itself in the cache going from full to empty in a
matter of seconds, even when only a small part of the cache is
needed to be emptied to free sufficient memory.Under metadata intensive workloads on ext4 and XFS, I'm seeing the
VFS caches increase memory consumption up to 75% of memory (no page
cache pressure) over a period of 30-60s, and then the shrinker
empties them down to zero in the space of 2-3s. This cycle repeats
over and over again, with the shrinker completely trashing the inode
and dentry caches every minute or so the workload continues.This behaviour was made obvious by the shrink_slab tracepoints added
earlier in the series, and made worse by the patch that corrected
the concurrent accounting of shrinker->nr.To avoid this problem, stop repeated small increments of the total
scan value from winding shrinker->nr up to a value that can cause
the entire cache to be freed. We still need to allow it to wind up,
so use the delta as the "large scan" threshold check - if the delta
is more than a quarter of the entire cache size, then it is a large
scan and allowed to cause lots of windup because we are clearly
needing to free lots of memory.If it isn't a large scan then limit the total scan to half the size
of the cache so that windup never increases to consume the whole
cache. Reducing the total scan limit further does not allow enough
wind-up to maintain the current levels of performance, whilst a
higher threshold does not prevent the windup from freeing the entire
cache under sustained workloads.Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner
Signed-off-by: Al Viro -
shrink_slab() allows shrinkers to be called in parallel so the
struct shrinker can be updated concurrently. It does not provide any
exclusio for such updates, so we can get the shrinker->nr value
increasing or decreasing incorrectly.As a result, when a shrinker repeatedly returns a value of -1 (e.g.
a VFS shrinker called w/ GFP_NOFS), the shrinker->nr goes haywire,
sometimes updating with the scan count that wasn't used, sometimes
losing it altogether. Worse is when a shrinker does work and that
update is lost due to racy updates, which means the shrinker will do
the work again!Fix this by making the total_scan calculations independent of
shrinker->nr, and making the shrinker->nr updates atomic w.r.t. to
other updates via cmpxchg loops.Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner
Signed-off-by: Al Viro -
It is impossible to understand what the shrinkers are actually doing
without instrumenting the code, so add a some tracepoints to allow
insight to be gained.Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner
Signed-off-by: Al Viro -
I'm running a workload which triggers a lot of swap in a machine with 4
nodes. After I kill the workload, I found a kswapd livelock. Sometimes
kswapd3 or kswapd2 are keeping running and I can't access filesystem,
but most memory is free.This looks like a regression since commit 08951e545918c159 ("mm: vmscan:
correct check for kswapd sleeping in sleeping_prematurely").Node 2 and 3 have only ZONE_NORMAL, but balance_pgdat() will return 0
for classzone_idx. The reason is end_zone in balance_pgdat() is 0 by
default, if all zones have watermark ok, end_zone will keep 0.Later sleeping_prematurely() always returns true. Because this is an
order 3 wakeup, and if classzone_idx is 0, both balanced_pages and
present_pages in pgdat_balanced() are 0. We add a special case here.
If a zone has no page, we think it's balanced. This fixes the livelock.Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li
Acked-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
09 Jul, 2011
4 commits
-
During allocator-intensive workloads, kswapd will be woken frequently
causing free memory to oscillate between the high and min watermark. This
is expected behaviour. Unfortunately, if the highest zone is small, a
problem occurs.When balance_pgdat() returns, it may be at a lower classzone_idx than it
started because the highest zone was unreclaimable. Before checking if it
should go to sleep though, it checks pgdat->classzone_idx which when there
is no other activity will be MAX_NR_ZONES-1. It interprets this as it has
been woken up while reclaiming, skips scheduling and reclaims again. As
there is no useful reclaim work to do, it enters into a loop of shrinking
slab consuming loads of CPU until the highest zone becomes reclaimable for
a long period of time.There are two problems here. 1) If the returned classzone or order is
lower, it'll continue reclaiming without scheduling. 2) if the highest
zone was marked unreclaimable but balance_pgdat() returns immediately at
DEF_PRIORITY, the new lower classzone is not communicated back to kswapd()
for sleeping.This patch does two things that are related. If the end_zone is
unreclaimable, this information is communicated back. Second, if the
classzone or order was reduced due to failing to reclaim, new information
is not read from pgdat and instead an attempt is made to go to sleep. Due
to this, it is also necessary that pgdat->classzone_idx be initialised
each time to pgdat->nr_zones - 1 to avoid re-reads being interpreted as
wakeups.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Reported-by: Pádraig Brady
Tested-by: Pádraig Brady
Tested-by: Andrew Lutomirski
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
When deciding if kswapd is sleeping prematurely, the classzone is taken
into account but this is different to what balance_pgdat() and the
allocator are doing. Specifically, the DMA zone will be checked based on
the classzone used when waking kswapd which could be for a GFP_KERNEL or
GFP_HIGHMEM request. The lowmem reserve limit kicks in, the watermark is
not met and kswapd thinks it's sleeping prematurely keeping kswapd awake in
error.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Reported-by: Pádraig Brady
Tested-by: Pádraig Brady
Tested-by: Andrew Lutomirski
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
During allocator-intensive workloads, kswapd will be woken frequently
causing free memory to oscillate between the high and min watermark. This
is expected behaviour.When kswapd applies pressure to zones during node balancing, it checks if
the zone is above a high+balance_gap threshold. If it is, it does not
apply pressure but it unconditionally shrinks slab on a global basis which
is excessive. In the event kswapd is being kept awake due to a high small
unreclaimable zone, it skips zone shrinking but still calls shrink_slab().Once pressure has been applied, the check for zone being unreclaimable is
being made before the check is made if all_unreclaimable should be set.
This miss of unreclaimable can cause has_under_min_watermark_zone to be
set due to an unreclaimable zone preventing kswapd backing off on
congestion_wait().Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Reported-by: Pádraig Brady
Tested-by: Pádraig Brady
Tested-by: Andrew Lutomirski
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
During allocator-intensive workloads, kswapd will be woken frequently
causing free memory to oscillate between the high and min watermark. This
is expected behaviour. Unfortunately, if the highest zone is small, a
problem occurs.This seems to happen most with recent sandybridge laptops but it's
probably a co-incidence as some of these laptops just happen to have a
small Normal zone. The reproduction case is almost always during copying
large files that kswapd pegs at 100% CPU until the file is deleted or
cache is dropped.The problem is mostly down to sleeping_prematurely() keeping kswapd awake
when the highest zone is small and unreclaimable and compounded by the
fact we shrink slabs even when not shrinking zones causing a lot of time
to be spent in shrinkers and a lot of memory to be reclaimed.Patch 1 corrects sleeping_prematurely to check the zones matching
the classzone_idx instead of all zones.Patch 2 avoids shrinking slab when we are not shrinking a zone.
Patch 3 notes that sleeping_prematurely is checking lower zones against
a high classzone which is not what allocators or balance_pgdat()
is doing leading to an artifical belief that kswapd should be
still awake.Patch 4 notes that when balance_pgdat() gives up on a high zone that the
decision is not communicated to sleeping_prematurely()This problem affects 2.6.38.8 for certain and is expected to affect 2.6.39
and 3.0-rc4 as well. If accepted, they need to go to -stable to be picked
up by distros and this series is against 3.0-rc4. I've cc'd people that
reported similar problems recently to see if they still suffer from the
problem and if this fixes it.This patch: correct the check for kswapd sleeping in sleeping_prematurely()
During allocator-intensive workloads, kswapd will be woken frequently
causing free memory to oscillate between the high and min watermark. This
is expected behaviour.A problem occurs if the highest zone is small. balance_pgdat() only
considers unreclaimable zones when priority is DEF_PRIORITY but
sleeping_prematurely considers all zones. It's possible for this sequence
to occur1. kswapd wakes up and enters balance_pgdat()
2. At DEF_PRIORITY, marks highest zone unreclaimable
3. At DEF_PRIORITY-1, ignores highest zone setting end_zone
4. At DEF_PRIORITY-1, calls shrink_slab freeing memory from
highest zone, clearing all_unreclaimable. Highest zone
is still unbalanced
5. kswapd returns and calls sleeping_prematurely
6. sleeping_prematurely looks at *all* zones, not just the ones
being considered by balance_pgdat. The highest small zone
has all_unreclaimable cleared but the zone is not
balanced. all_zones_ok is false so kswapd stays awakeThis patch corrects the behaviour of sleeping_prematurely to check the
zones balance_pgdat() checked.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Reported-by: Pádraig Brady
Tested-by: Pádraig Brady
Tested-by: Andrew Lutomirski
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
28 Jun, 2011
1 commit
-
Commit d149e3b25d7c ("memcg: add the soft_limit reclaim in global direct
reclaim") adds a softlimit hook to shrink_zones(). By this, soft limit
is called astry_to_free_pages()
do_try_to_free_pages()
shrink_zones()
mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim()Then, direct reclaim is memcg softlimit hint aware, now.
But, the memory cgroup's "limit" path can call softlimit shrinker.
try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages()
do_try_to_free_pages()
shrink_zones()
mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim()This will cause a global reclaim when a memcg hits limit.
This is bug. soft_limit_reclaim() should be called when
scanning_global_lru(sc) == true.And the commit adds a variable "total_scanned" for counting softlimit
scanned pages....it's not "total". This patch removes the variable and
update sc->nr_scanned instead of it. This will affect shrink_slab()'s
scan condition but, global LRU is scanned by softlimit and I think this
change makes sense.TODO: avoid too much scanning of a zone when softlimit did enough work.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura
Cc: Ying Han
Cc: Michal Hocko
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
16 Jun, 2011
2 commits
-
It is unsafe to run page_count during the physical pfn scan because
compound_head could trip on a dangling pointer when reading
page->first_page if the compound page is being freed by another CPU.[mgorman@suse.de: split out patch]
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko
Reviewed-by: Minchan KimSigned-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Currently, memcg reclaim can disable swap token even if the swap token mm
doesn't belong in its memory cgroup. It's slightly risky. If an admin
creates very small mem-cgroup and silly guy runs contentious heavy memory
pressure workload, every tasks are going to lose swap token and then
system may become unresponsive. That's bad.This patch adds 'memcg' parameter into disable_swap_token(). and if the
parameter doesn't match swap token, VM doesn't disable it.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
27 May, 2011
5 commits
-
The caller of the function has been renamed to zone_nr_lru_pages(), and
this is just fixing up in the memcg code. The current name is easily to
be mis-read as zone's total number of pages.Signed-off-by: Ying Han
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim
Cc: Balbir Singh
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
During memory reclaim we determine the number of pages to be scanned per
zone as(anon + file) >> priority.
Assume
scan = (anon + file) >> priority.If scan < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, the scan will be skipped for this time and
priority gets higher. This has some problems.1. This increases priority as 1 without any scan.
To do scan in this priority, amount of pages should be larger than 512M.
If pages>>priority < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, it's recorded and scan will be
batched, later. (But we lose 1 priority.)
If memory size is below 16M, pages >> priority is 0 and no scan in
DEF_PRIORITY forever.2. If zone->all_unreclaimabe==true, it's scanned only when priority==0.
So, x86's ZONE_DMA will never be recoverred until the user of pages
frees memory by itself.3. With memcg, the limit of memory can be small. When using small memcg,
it gets priority < DEF_PRIORITY-2 very easily and need to call
wait_iff_congested().
For doing scan before priorty=9, 64MB of memory should be used.Then, this patch tries to scan SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX of pages in force...when
1. the target is enough small.
2. it's kswapd or memcg reclaim.Then we can avoid rapid priority drop and may be able to recover
all_unreclaimable in a small zones. And this patch removes nr_saved_scan.
This will allow scanning in this priority even when pages >> priority is
very small.Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Acked-by: Ying Han
Cc: Balbir Singh
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura
Cc: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Presently, memory cgroup's direct reclaim frees memory from the current
node. But this has some troubles. Usually when a set of threads works in
a cooperative way, they tend to operate on the same node. So if they hit
limits under memcg they will reclaim memory from themselves, damaging the
active working set.For example, assume 2 node system which has Node 0 and Node 1 and a memcg
which has 1G limit. After some work, file cache remains and the usages
areNode 0: 1M
Node 1: 998M.and run an application on Node 0, it will eat its foot before freeing
unnecessary file caches.This patch adds round-robin for NUMA and adds equal pressure to each node.
When using cpuset's spread memory feature, this will work very well.But yes, a better algorithm is needed.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: comment editing]
[kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com: fix time comparisons]
Signed-off-by: Ying Han
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Balbir Singh
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura
Cc: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
We recently added the change in global background reclaim which counts the
return value of soft_limit reclaim. Now this patch adds the similar logic
on global direct reclaim.We should skip scanning global LRU on shrink_zone if soft_limit reclaim
does enough work. This is the first step where we start with counting the
nr_scanned and nr_reclaimed from soft_limit reclaim into global
scan_control.Signed-off-by: Ying Han
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura
Cc: Balbir Singh
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Michal Hocko
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The global kswapd scans per-zone LRU and reclaims pages regardless of the
cgroup. It breaks memory isolation since one cgroup can end up reclaiming
pages from another cgroup. Instead we should rely on memcg-aware target
reclaim including per-memcg kswapd and soft_limit hierarchical reclaim under
memory pressure.In the global background reclaim, we do soft reclaim before scanning the
per-zone LRU. However, the return value is ignored. This patch is the first
step to skip shrink_zone() if soft_limit reclaim does enough work.This is part of the effort which tries to reduce reclaiming pages in global
LRU in memcg. The per-memcg background reclaim patchset further enhances the
per-cgroup targetting reclaim, which I should have V4 posted shortly.Try running multiple memory intensive workloads within seperate memcgs. Watch
the counters of soft_steal in memory.stat.$ cat /dev/cgroup/A/memory.stat | grep 'soft'
soft_steal 240000
soft_scan 240000
total_soft_steal 240000
total_soft_scan 240000This patch:
In the global background reclaim, we do soft reclaim before scanning the
per-zone LRU. However, the return value is ignored.We would like to skip shrink_zone() if soft_limit reclaim does enough
work. Also, we need to make the memory pressure balanced across per-memcg
zones, like the logic vm-core. This patch is the first step where we
start with counting the nr_scanned and nr_reclaimed from soft_limit
reclaim into the global scan_control.Signed-off-by: Ying Han
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Balbir Singh
Acked-by: Daisuke Nishimura
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
25 May, 2011
5 commits
-
Change each shrinker's API by consolidating the existing parameters into
shrink_control struct. This will simplify any further features added w/o
touching each file of shrinker.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix up new shrinker API]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix xfs warning]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: update gfs2]
Signed-off-by: Ying Han
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Minchan Kim
Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Steven Whitehouse
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Consolidate the existing parameters to shrink_slab() into a new
shrink_control struct. This is needed later to pass the same struct to
shrinkers.Signed-off-by: Ying Han
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Minchan Kim
Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
isolate_lru_page() must be called only with stable reference to the page,
this is what is written in the comment above it, this is reasonable.current isolate_lru_page() users and its page extra reference sources:
mm/huge_memory.c:
__collapse_huge_page_isolate() - reference from ptemm/memcontrol.c:
mem_cgroup_move_parent() - get_page_unless_zero()
mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range() - reference from ptemm/memory-failure.c:
soft_offline_page() - fixed, reference from get_any_page()
delete_from_lru_cache() - reference from caller or get_page_unless_zero()
[ seems like there bug, because __memory_failure() can call
page_action() for hpages tail, but it is ok for
isolate_lru_page(), tail getted and not in lru]mm/memory_hotplug.c:
do_migrate_range() - fixed, get_page_unless_zero()mm/mempolicy.c:
migrate_page_add() - reference from ptemm/migrate.c:
do_move_page_to_node_array() - reference from follow_page()mlock.c: - various external references
mm/vmscan.c:
putback_lru_page() - reference from isolate_lru_page()It seems that all isolate_lru_page() users are ready now for this
restriction. So, let's replace redundant get_page_unless_zero() with
get_page() and add page initial reference count check with VM_BUG_ON()Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
It has been reported on some laptops that kswapd is consuming large
amounts of CPU and not being scheduled when SLUB is enabled during large
amounts of file copying. It is expected that this is due to kswapd
missing every cond_resched() point because;shrink_page_list() calls cond_resched() if inactive pages were isolated
which in turn may not happen if all_unreclaimable is set in
shrink_zones(). If for whatver reason, all_unreclaimable is
set on all zones, we can miss calling cond_resched().balance_pgdat() only calls cond_resched if the zones are not
balanced. For a high-order allocation that is balanced, it
checks order-0 again. During that window, order-0 might have
become unbalanced so it loops again for order-0 and returns
that it was reclaiming for order-0 to kswapd(). It can then
find that a caller has rewoken kswapd for a high-order and
re-enters balance_pgdat() without ever calling cond_resched().shrink_slab only calls cond_resched() if we are reclaiming slab
pages. If there are a large number of direct reclaimers, the
shrinker_rwsem can be contended and prevent kswapd calling
cond_resched().This patch modifies the shrink_slab() case. If the semaphore is
contended, the caller will still check cond_resched(). After each
successful call into a shrinker, the check for cond_resched() remains in
case one shrinker is particularly slow.[mgorman@suse.de: preserve call to cond_resched after each call into shrinker]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Wu Fengguang
Cc: James Bottomley
Tested-by: Colin King
Cc: Raghavendra D Prabhu
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Chris Mason
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: [2.6.38+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
There are a few reports of people experiencing hangs when copying large
amounts of data with kswapd using a large amount of CPU which appear to be
due to recent reclaim changes. SLUB using high orders is the trigger but
not the root cause as SLUB has been using high orders for a while. The
root cause was bugs introduced into reclaim which are addressed by the
following two patches.Patch 1 corrects logic introduced by commit 1741c877 ("mm: kswapd:
keep kswapd awake for high-order allocations until a percentage of
the node is balanced") to allow kswapd to go to sleep when
balanced for high orders.Patch 2 notes that it is possible for kswapd to miss every
cond_resched() and updates shrink_slab() so it'll at least reach
that scheduling point.Chris Wood reports that these two patches in isolation are sufficient to
prevent the system hanging. AFAIK, they should also resolve similar hangs
experienced by James Bottomley.This patch:
Johannes Weiner poined out that the logic in commit 1741c877 ("mm: kswapd:
keep kswapd awake for high-order allocations until a percentage of the
node is balanced") is backwards. Instead of allowing kswapd to go to
sleep when balancing for high order allocations, it keeps it kswapd
running uselessly.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang
Cc: James Bottomley
Tested-by: Colin King
Cc: Raghavendra D Prabhu
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Chris Mason
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Rik van Riel
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim
Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang
Cc: [2.6.38+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
21 May, 2011
1 commit
-
Commit e66eed651fd1 ("list: remove prefetching from regular list
iterators") removed the include of prefetch.h from list.h, which
uncovered several cases that had apparently relied on that rather
obscure header file dependency.So this fixes things up a bit, using
grep -L linux/prefetch.h $(git grep -l '[^a-z_]prefetchw*(' -- '*.[ch]')
grep -L 'prefetchw*(' $(git grep -l 'linux/prefetch.h' -- '*.[ch]')to guide us in finding files that either need
inclusion, or have it despite not needing it.There are more of them around (mostly network drivers), but this gets
many core ones.Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
18 May, 2011
1 commit
-
ZONE_CONGESTED should be a state of global memory reclaim. If not, a busy
memcg sets this and give unnecessary throttoling in wait_iff_congested()
against memory recalim in other contexts. This makes system performance
bad.I'll think about "memcg is congested!" flag is required or not, later.
But this fix is required first.Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura
Acked-by: Ying Han
Cc: Balbir Singh
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
15 Apr, 2011
1 commit
-
all_unreclaimable check in direct reclaim has been introduced at 2.6.19
by following commit.2006 Sep 25; commit 408d8544; oom: use unreclaimable info
And it went through strange history. firstly, following commit broke
the logic unintentionally.2008 Apr 29; commit a41f24ea; page allocator: smarter retry of
costly-order allocationsTwo years later, I've found obvious meaningless code fragment and
restored original intention by following commit.2010 Jun 04; commit bb21c7ce; vmscan: fix do_try_to_free_pages()
return value when priority==0But, the logic didn't works when 32bit highmem system goes hibernation
and Minchan slightly changed the algorithm and fixed it .2010 Sep 22: commit d1908362: vmscan: check all_unreclaimable
in direct reclaim pathBut, recently, Andrey Vagin found the new corner case. Look,
struct zone {
..
int all_unreclaimable;
..
unsigned long pages_scanned;
..
}zone->all_unreclaimable and zone->pages_scanned are neigher atomic
variables nor protected by lock. Therefore zones can become a state of
zone->page_scanned=0 and zone->all_unreclaimable=1. In this case, current
all_unreclaimable() return false even though zone->all_unreclaimabe=1.This resulted in the kernel hanging up when executing a loop of the form
1. fork
2. mmap
3. touch memory
4. read memory
5. munmmapas described in
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1348725#1348725Is this ignorable minor issue? No. Unfortunately, x86 has very small dma
zone and it become zone->all_unreclamble=1 easily. and if it become
all_unreclaimable=1, it never restore all_unreclaimable=0. Why? if
all_unreclaimable=1, vmscan only try DEF_PRIORITY reclaim and
a-few-lru-pages>>DEF_PRIORITY always makes 0. that mean no page scan at
all!Eventually, oom-killer never works on such systems. That said, we can't
use zone->pages_scanned for this purpose. This patch restore
all_unreclaimable() use zone->all_unreclaimable as old. and in addition,
to add oom_killer_disabled check to avoid reintroduce the issue of commit
d1908362 ("vmscan: check all_unreclaimable in direct reclaim path").Reported-by: Andrey Vagin
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
Cc: Nick Piggin
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Acked-by: David Rientjes
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
31 Mar, 2011
1 commit
-
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi
25 Mar, 2011
1 commit
-
* 'for-2.6.39/core' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block: (65 commits)
Documentation/iostats.txt: bit-size reference etc.
cfq-iosched: removing unnecessary think time checking
cfq-iosched: Don't clear queue stats when preempt.
blk-throttle: Reset group slice when limits are changed
blk-cgroup: Only give unaccounted_time under debug
cfq-iosched: Don't set active queue in preempt
block: fix non-atomic access to genhd inflight structures
block: attempt to merge with existing requests on plug flush
block: NULL dereference on error path in __blkdev_get()
cfq-iosched: Don't update group weights when on service tree
fs: assign sb->s_bdi to default_backing_dev_info if the bdi is going away
block: Require subsystems to explicitly allocate bio_set integrity mempool
jbd2: finish conversion from WRITE_SYNC_PLUG to WRITE_SYNC and explicit plugging
jbd: finish conversion from WRITE_SYNC_PLUG to WRITE_SYNC and explicit plugging
fs: make fsync_buffers_list() plug
mm: make generic_writepages() use plugging
blk-cgroup: Add unaccounted time to timeslice_used.
block: fixup plugging stubs for !CONFIG_BLOCK
block: remove obsolete comments for blkdev_issue_zeroout.
blktrace: Use rq->cmd_flags directly in blk_add_trace_rq.
...Fix up conflicts in fs/{aio.c,super.c}
23 Mar, 2011
3 commits
-
When reclaiming for order-0 pages, kswapd requires that all zones be
balanced. Each cycle through balance_pgdat() does background ageing on
all zones if necessary and applies equal pressure on the inactive zone
unless a lot of pages are free already.A "lot of free pages" is defined as a "balance gap" above the high
watermark which is currently 7*high_watermark. Historically this was
reasonable as min_free_kbytes was small. However, on systems using huge
pages, it is recommended that min_free_kbytes is higher and it is tuned
with hugeadm --set-recommended-min_free_kbytes. With the introduction of
transparent huge page support, this recommended value is also applied. On
X86-64 with 4G of memory, min_free_kbytes becomes 67584 so one would
expect around 68M of memory to be free. The Normal zone is approximately
35000 pages so under even normal memory pressure such as copying a large
file, it gets exhausted quickly. As it is getting exhausted, kswapd
applies pressure equally to all zones, including the DMA32 zone. DMA32 is
approximately 700,000 pages with a high watermark of around 23,000 pages.
In this situation, kswapd will reclaim around (23000*8 where 8 is the high
watermark + balance gap of 7 * high watermark) pages or 718M of pages
before the zone is ignored. What the user sees is that free memory far
higher than it should be.To avoid an excessive number of pages being reclaimed from the larger
zones, explicitely defines the "balance gap" to be either 1% of the zone
or the low watermark for the zone, whichever is smaller. While kswapd
will check all zones to apply pressure, it'll ignore zones that meets the
(high_wmark + balance_gap) watermark.To test this, 80G were copied from a partition and the amount of memory
being used was recorded. A comparison of a patch and unpatched kernel can
be seen at
http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/minfree-20110222/memory-usage-hydra.ps
and shows that kswapd is not reclaiming as much memory with the patch
applied.Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Shaohua Li
Cc: "Chen, Tim C"
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Now we renamed remove_from_page_cache with delete_from_page_cache. As
consistency of __remove_from_swap_cache and remove_from_swap_cache, we
change internal page cache handling function name, too.Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim
Cc: Christoph Hellwig
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins
Acked-by: Mel Gorman
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reviewed-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This patch reverts 5a03b051 ("thp: use compaction in kswapd for GFP_ATOMIC
order > 0") due to reports stating that kswapd CPU usage was higher and
IRQs were being disabled more frequently. This was reported at
http://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/alsa-user/msg09885.html.Without this patch applied, CPU usage by kswapd hovers around the 20% mark
according to the tester (Arthur Marsh:
http://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/alsa-user/msg09899.html). With this
patch applied, it's around 2%.The problem is not related to THP which specifies __GFP_NO_KSWAPD but is
triggered by high-order allocations hitting the low watermark for their
order and waking kswapd on kernels with CONFIG_COMPACTION set. The most
common trigger for this is network cards configured for jumbo frames but
it's also possible it'll be triggered by fork-heavy workloads (order-1)
and some wireless cards which depend on order-1 allocations.The symptoms for the user will be high CPU usage by kswapd in low-memory
situations which could be confused with another writeback problem. While
a patch like 5a03b051 may be reintroduced in the future, this patch plays
it safe for now and reverts it.[mel@csn.ul.ie: Beefed up the changelog]
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Reported-by: Arthur Marsh
Tested-by: Arthur Marsh
Cc: [2.6.38.1]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
10 Mar, 2011
2 commits
-
Conflicts:
block/blk-core.c
block/blk-flush.c
drivers/md/raid1.c
drivers/md/raid10.c
drivers/md/raid5.c
fs/nilfs2/btnode.c
fs/nilfs2/mdt.cSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe
-
Code has been converted over to the new explicit on-stack plugging,
and delay users have been converted to use the new API for that.
So lets kill off the old plugging along with aops->sync_page().Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe
26 Feb, 2011
1 commit
-
should_continue_reclaim() for reclaim/compaction allows scanning to
continue even if pages are not being reclaimed until the full list is
scanned. In terms of allocation success, this makes sense but potentially
it introduces unwanted latency for high-order allocations such as
transparent hugepages and network jumbo frames that would prefer to fail
the allocation attempt and fallback to order-0 pages. Worse, there is a
potential that the full LRU scan will clear all the young bits, distort
page aging information and potentially push pages into swap that would
have otherwise remained resident.This patch will stop reclaim/compaction if no pages were reclaimed in the
last SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages that were considered. For allocations such as
hugetlbfs that use __GFP_REPEAT and have fewer fallback options, the full
LRU list may still be scanned.Order-0 allocation should not be affected because RECLAIM_MODE_COMPACTION
is not set so the following avoids the gfp_mask being examined:if (!(sc->reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_MODE_COMPACTION))
return false;A tool was developed based on ftrace that tracked the latency of
high-order allocations while transparent hugepage support was enabled and
three benchmarks were run. The "fix-infinite" figures are 2.6.38-rc4 with
Johannes's patch "vmscan: fix zone shrinking exit when scan work is done"
applied.STREAM Highorder Allocation Latency Statistics
fix-infinite break-early
1 :: Count 10298 10229
1 :: Min 0.4560 0.4640
1 :: Mean 1.0589 1.0183
1 :: Max 14.5990 11.7510
1 :: Stddev 0.5208 0.4719
2 :: Count 2 1
2 :: Min 1.8610 3.7240
2 :: Mean 3.4325 3.7240
2 :: Max 5.0040 3.7240
2 :: Stddev 1.5715 0.0000
9 :: Count 111696 111694
9 :: Min 0.5230 0.4110
9 :: Mean 10.5831 10.5718
9 :: Max 38.4480 43.2900
9 :: Stddev 1.1147 1.1325Mean time for order-1 allocations is reduced. order-2 looks increased but
with so few allocations, it's not particularly significant. THP mean
allocation latency is also reduced. That said, allocation time varies so
significantly that the reductions are within noise.Max allocation time is reduced by a significant amount for low-order
allocations but reduced for THP allocations which presumably are now
breaking before reclaim has done enough work.SysBench Highorder Allocation Latency Statistics
fix-infinite break-early
1 :: Count 15745 15677
1 :: Min 0.4250 0.4550
1 :: Mean 1.1023 1.0810
1 :: Max 14.4590 10.8220
1 :: Stddev 0.5117 0.5100
2 :: Count 1 1
2 :: Min 3.0040 2.1530
2 :: Mean 3.0040 2.1530
2 :: Max 3.0040 2.1530
2 :: Stddev 0.0000 0.0000
9 :: Count 2017 1931
9 :: Min 0.4980 0.7480
9 :: Mean 10.4717 10.3840
9 :: Max 24.9460 26.2500
9 :: Stddev 1.1726 1.1966Again, mean time for order-1 allocations is reduced while order-2
allocations are too few to draw conclusions from. The mean time for THP
allocations is also slightly reduced albeit the reductions are within
varianes.Once again, our maximum allocation time is significantly reduced for
low-order allocations and slightly increased for THP allocations.Anon stream mmap reference Highorder Allocation Latency Statistics
1 :: Count 1376 1790
1 :: Min 0.4940 0.5010
1 :: Mean 1.0289 0.9732
1 :: Max 6.2670 4.2540
1 :: Stddev 0.4142 0.2785
2 :: Count 1 -
2 :: Min 1.9060 -
2 :: Mean 1.9060 -
2 :: Max 1.9060 -
2 :: Stddev 0.0000 -
9 :: Count 11266 11257
9 :: Min 0.4990 0.4940
9 :: Mean 27250.4669 24256.1919
9 :: Max 11439211.0000 6008885.0000
9 :: Stddev 226427.4624 186298.1430This benchmark creates one thread per CPU which references an amount of
anonymous memory 1.5 times the size of physical RAM. This pounds swap
quite heavily and is intended to exercise THP a bit.Mean allocation time for order-1 is reduced as before. It's also reduced
for THP allocations but the variations here are pretty massive due to
swap. As before, maximum allocation times are significantly reduced.Overall, the patch reduces the mean and maximum allocation latencies for
the smaller high-order allocations. This was with Slab configured so it
would be expected to be more significant with Slub which uses these size
allocations more aggressively.The mean allocation times for THP allocations are also slightly reduced.
The maximum latency was slightly increased as predicted by the comments
due to reclaim/compaction breaking early. However, workloads care more
about the latency of lower-order allocations than THP so it's an
acceptable trade-off.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Andrea Arcangeli
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim
Acked-by: Andrea Arcangeli
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Kent Overstreet
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
12 Feb, 2011
1 commit
-
Commit 3e7d34497067 ("mm: vmscan: reclaim order-0 and use compaction
instead of lumpy reclaim") introduced an indefinite loop in
shrink_zone().It meant to break out of this loop when no pages had been reclaimed and
not a single page was even scanned. The way it would detect the latter
is by taking a snapshot of sc->nr_scanned at the beginning of the
function and comparing it against the new sc->nr_scanned after the scan
loop. But it would re-iterate without updating that snapshot, looping
forever if sc->nr_scanned changed at least once since shrink_zone() was
invoked.This is not the sole condition that would exit that loop, but it
requires other processes to change the zone state, as the reclaimer that
is stuck obviously can not anymore.This is only happening for higher-order allocations, where reclaim is
run back to back with compaction.Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Reported-by: Michal Hocko
Tested-by: Kent Overstreet
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet
Acked-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli
Cc: Rik van Riel
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
26 Jan, 2011
1 commit
-
Before 0e093d99763e ("writeback: do not sleep on the congestion queue if
there are no congested BDIs or if significant congestion is not being
encountered in the current zone"), preferred_zone was only used for NUMA
statistics, to determine the zoneidx from which to allocate from given
the type requested, and whether to utilize memory compaction.wait_iff_congested(), though, uses preferred_zone to determine if the
congestion wait should be deferred because its dirty pages are backed by
a congested bdi. This incorrectly defers the timeout and busy loops in
the page allocator with various cond_resched() calls if preferred_zone
is not allowed in the current context, usually consuming 100% of a cpu.This patch ensures preferred_zone is an allowed zone in the fastpath
depending on whether current is constrained by its cpuset or nodes in
its mempolicy (when the nodemask passed is non-NULL). This is correct
since the fastpath allocation always passes ALLOC_CPUSET when trying to
allocate memory. In the slowpath, this patch resets preferred_zone to
the first zone of the allowed type when the allocation is not
constrained by current's cpuset, i.e. it does not pass ALLOC_CPUSET.This patch also ensures preferred_zone is from the set of allowed nodes
when called from within direct reclaim since allocations are always
constrained by cpusets in this context (it is blockable).Both of these uses of cpuset_current_mems_allowed are protected by
get_mems_allowed().Signed-off-by: David Rientjes
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Wu Fengguang
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
21 Jan, 2011
1 commit
-
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
