02 Nov, 2017
1 commit
-
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
26 Jan, 2014
1 commit
-
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
30 Jul, 2011
1 commit
-
When commit 4e34e719e457 ("fs: take the ACL checks to common code")
changed the xyz_check_acl() functions into the more natural
xyz_get_acl() interface, we grew two copies of the#define ext2_get_acl NULL
define for the non-acl case.
Remove the extra one.
Reported-by: Marco Stornelli
Cc: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
26 Jul, 2011
1 commit
-
Replace the ->check_acl method with a ->get_acl method that simply reads an
ACL from disk after having a cache miss. This means we can replace the ACL
checking boilerplate code with a single implementation in namei.c.Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
20 Jul, 2011
1 commit
-
not used in the instances anymore.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
07 Jan, 2011
1 commit
-
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin
09 Sep, 2009
1 commit
-
Don't implement per-filesystem 'extX_permission()' functions that have
to be called for every path component operation, and instead just expose
the actual ACL checking so that the VFS layer can now do it for us.Reviewed-by: James Morris
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
24 Jun, 2009
1 commit
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
27 Jul, 2008
1 commit
-
* kill nameidata * argument; map the 3 bits in ->flags anybody cares
about to new MAY_... ones and pass with the mask.
* kill redundant gfs2_iop_permission()
* sanitize ecryptfs_permission()
* fix remaining places where ->permission() instances might barf on new
MAY_... found in mask.The obvious next target in that direction is permission(9)
folded fix for nfs_permission() breakage from Miklos Szeredi
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
24 Jun, 2005
1 commit
-
This file duplicates , using slightly different
names.Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
17 Apr, 2005
1 commit
-
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.Let it rip!