05 Jun, 2014
40 commits
-
Transform action part of ttu_flags into individiual bits. These flags
aren't part of any uses-space visible api or even trace events.Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
In its munmap mode, try_to_unmap_one() searches other mlocked vmas, it
never unmaps pages. There is no reason for invalidation because ptes are
left unchanged.Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
CONFIG_CROSS_MEMORY_ATTACH adds couple syscalls: process_vm_readv and
process_vm_writev, it's a kind of IPC for copying data between processes.
Currently this option is placed inside "Processor type and features".This patch moves it into "General setup" (where all other arch-independed
syscalls and ipc features are placed) and changes prompt string to less
cryptic.Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov
Cc: Christopher Yeoh
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Commit "mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for kswapd"
ensured that file/anon lists were scanned proportionally for reclaim from
kswapd but ignored it for direct reclaim. The intent was to minimse
direct reclaim latency but Yuanhan Liu pointer out that it substitutes one
long stall for many small stalls and distorts aging for normal workloads
like streaming readers/writers. Hugh Dickins pointed out that a
side-effect of the same commit was that when one LRU list dropped to zero
that the entirety of the other list was shrunk leading to excessive
reclaim in memcgs. This patch scans the file/anon lists proportionally
for direct reclaim to similarly age page whether reclaimed by kswapd or
direct reclaim but takes care to abort reclaim if one LRU drops to zero
after reclaiming the requested number of pages.Based on ext4 and using the Intel VM scalability test
3.15.0-rc5 3.15.0-rc5
shrinker proportion
Unit lru-file-readonce elapsed 5.3500 ( 0.00%) 5.4200 ( -1.31%)
Unit lru-file-readonce time_range 0.2700 ( 0.00%) 0.1400 ( 48.15%)
Unit lru-file-readonce time_stddv 0.1148 ( 0.00%) 0.0536 ( 53.33%)
Unit lru-file-readtwice elapsed 8.1700 ( 0.00%) 8.1700 ( 0.00%)
Unit lru-file-readtwice time_range 0.4300 ( 0.00%) 0.2300 ( 46.51%)
Unit lru-file-readtwice time_stddv 0.1650 ( 0.00%) 0.0971 ( 41.16%)The test cases are running multiple dd instances reading sparse files. The results are within
the noise for the small test machine. The impact of the patch is more noticable from the vmstats3.15.0-rc5 3.15.0-rc5
shrinker proportion
Minor Faults 35154 36784
Major Faults 611 1305
Swap Ins 394 1651
Swap Outs 4394 5891
Allocation stalls 118616 44781
Direct pages scanned 4935171 4602313
Kswapd pages scanned 15921292 16258483
Kswapd pages reclaimed 15913301 16248305
Direct pages reclaimed 4933368 4601133
Kswapd efficiency 99% 99%
Kswapd velocity 670088.047 682555.961
Direct efficiency 99% 99%
Direct velocity 207709.217 193212.133
Percentage direct scans 23% 22%
Page writes by reclaim 4858.000 6232.000
Page writes file 464 341
Page writes anon 4394 5891Note that there are fewer allocation stalls even though the amount
of direct reclaim scanning is very approximately the same.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Tim Chen
Cc: Dave Chinner
Tested-by: Yuanhan Liu
Cc: Bob Liu
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
We remove the call to grab_super_passive in call to super_cache_count.
This becomes a scalability bottleneck as multiple threads are trying to do
memory reclamation, e.g. when we are doing large amount of file read and
page cache is under pressure. The cached objects quickly got reclaimed
down to 0 and we are aborting the cache_scan() reclaim. But counting
creates a log jam acquiring the sb_lock.We are holding the shrinker_rwsem which ensures the safety of call to
list_lru_count_node() and s_op->nr_cached_objects. The shrinker is
unregistered now before ->kill_sb() so the operation is safe when we are
doing unmount.The impact will depend heavily on the machine and the workload but for a
small machine using postmark tuned to use 4xRAM size the results were3.15.0-rc5 3.15.0-rc5
vanilla shrinker-v1r1
Ops/sec Transactions 21.00 ( 0.00%) 24.00 ( 14.29%)
Ops/sec FilesCreate 39.00 ( 0.00%) 44.00 ( 12.82%)
Ops/sec CreateTransact 10.00 ( 0.00%) 12.00 ( 20.00%)
Ops/sec FilesDeleted 6202.00 ( 0.00%) 6202.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops/sec DeleteTransact 11.00 ( 0.00%) 12.00 ( 9.09%)
Ops/sec DataRead/MB 25.97 ( 0.00%) 29.10 ( 12.05%)
Ops/sec DataWrite/MB 49.99 ( 0.00%) 56.02 ( 12.06%)ffsb running in a configuration that is meant to simulate a mail server showed
3.15.0-rc5 3.15.0-rc5
vanilla shrinker-v1r1
Ops/sec readall 9402.63 ( 0.00%) 9567.97 ( 1.76%)
Ops/sec create 4695.45 ( 0.00%) 4735.00 ( 0.84%)
Ops/sec delete 173.72 ( 0.00%) 179.83 ( 3.52%)
Ops/sec Transactions 14271.80 ( 0.00%) 14482.81 ( 1.48%)
Ops/sec Read 37.00 ( 0.00%) 37.60 ( 1.62%)
Ops/sec Write 18.20 ( 0.00%) 18.30 ( 0.55%)Signed-off-by: Tim Chen
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Chinner
Tested-by: Yuanhan Liu
Cc: Bob Liu
Cc: Jan Kara
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This series is aimed at regressions noticed during reclaim activity. The
first two patches are shrinker patches that were posted ages ago but never
merged for reasons that are unclear to me. I'm posting them again to see
if there was a reason they were dropped or if they just got lost. Dave?
Time? The last patch adjusts proportional reclaim. Yuanhan Liu, can you
retest the vm scalability test cases on a larger machine? Hugh, does this
work for you on the memcg test cases?Based on ext4, I get the following results but unfortunately my larger
test machines are all unavailable so this is based on a relatively small
machine.postmark
3.15.0-rc5 3.15.0-rc5
vanilla proportion-v1r4
Ops/sec Transactions 21.00 ( 0.00%) 25.00 ( 19.05%)
Ops/sec FilesCreate 39.00 ( 0.00%) 45.00 ( 15.38%)
Ops/sec CreateTransact 10.00 ( 0.00%) 12.00 ( 20.00%)
Ops/sec FilesDeleted 6202.00 ( 0.00%) 6202.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops/sec DeleteTransact 11.00 ( 0.00%) 12.00 ( 9.09%)
Ops/sec DataRead/MB 25.97 ( 0.00%) 30.02 ( 15.59%)
Ops/sec DataWrite/MB 49.99 ( 0.00%) 57.78 ( 15.58%)ffsb (mail server simulator)
3.15.0-rc5 3.15.0-rc5
vanilla proportion-v1r4
Ops/sec readall 9402.63 ( 0.00%) 9805.74 ( 4.29%)
Ops/sec create 4695.45 ( 0.00%) 4781.39 ( 1.83%)
Ops/sec delete 173.72 ( 0.00%) 177.23 ( 2.02%)
Ops/sec Transactions 14271.80 ( 0.00%) 14764.37 ( 3.45%)
Ops/sec Read 37.00 ( 0.00%) 38.50 ( 4.05%)
Ops/sec Write 18.20 ( 0.00%) 18.50 ( 1.65%)dd of a large file
3.15.0-rc5 3.15.0-rc5
vanilla proportion-v1r4
WallTime DownloadTar 75.00 ( 0.00%) 61.00 ( 18.67%)
WallTime DD 423.00 ( 0.00%) 401.00 ( 5.20%)
WallTime Delete 2.00 ( 0.00%) 5.00 (-150.00%)stutter (times mmap latency during large amounts of IO)
3.15.0-rc5 3.15.0-rc5
vanilla proportion-v1r4
Unit >5ms Delays 80252.0000 ( 0.00%) 81523.0000 ( -1.58%)
Unit Mmap min 8.2118 ( 0.00%) 8.3206 ( -1.33%)
Unit Mmap mean 17.4614 ( 0.00%) 17.2868 ( 1.00%)
Unit Mmap stddev 24.9059 ( 0.00%) 34.6771 (-39.23%)
Unit Mmap max 2811.6433 ( 0.00%) 2645.1398 ( 5.92%)
Unit Mmap 90% 20.5098 ( 0.00%) 18.3105 ( 10.72%)
Unit Mmap 93% 22.9180 ( 0.00%) 20.1751 ( 11.97%)
Unit Mmap 95% 25.2114 ( 0.00%) 22.4988 ( 10.76%)
Unit Mmap 99% 46.1430 ( 0.00%) 43.5952 ( 5.52%)
Unit Ideal Tput 85.2623 ( 0.00%) 78.8906 ( 7.47%)
Unit Tput min 44.0666 ( 0.00%) 43.9609 ( 0.24%)
Unit Tput mean 45.5646 ( 0.00%) 45.2009 ( 0.80%)
Unit Tput stddev 0.9318 ( 0.00%) 1.1084 (-18.95%)
Unit Tput max 46.7375 ( 0.00%) 46.7539 ( -0.04%)This patch (of 3):
We will like to unregister the sb shrinker before ->kill_sb(). This will
allow cached objects to be counted without call to grab_super_passive() to
update ref count on sb. We want to avoid locking during memory
reclamation especially when we are skipping the memory reclaim when we are
out of cached objects.This is safe because grab_super_passive does a try-lock on the
sb->s_umount now, and so if we are in the unmount process, it won't ever
block. That means what used to be a deadlock and races we were avoiding
by using grab_super_passive() is now:shrinker umount
down_read(shrinker_rwsem)
down_write(sb->s_umount)
shrinker_unregister
down_write(shrinker_rwsem)
grab_super_passive(sb)
down_read_trylock(sb->s_umount)
....
up_read(shrinker_rwsem)
up_write(shrinker_rwsem)
->kill_sb()
....So it is safe to deregister the shrinker before ->kill_sb().
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Chinner
Tested-by: Yuanhan Liu
Cc: Bob Liu
Cc: Jan Kara
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
msync() currently syncs more than POSIX requires or BSD or Solaris
implement. It is supposed to be equivalent to fdatasync(), not fsync(),
and it is only supposed to sync the portion of the file that overlaps the
range passed to msync.If the VMA is non-linear, fall back to syncing the entire file, but we
still optimise to only fdatasync() the entire file, not the full fsync().akpm: there are obvious concerns with bck-compatibility: is anyone relying
on the undocumented side-effect for their data integrity? And how would
they ever know if this change broke their data integrity?We think the risk is reasonably low, and this patch brings the kernel into
line with other OS's and with what the manpage has always said...Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
Acked-by: Jeff Moyer
Cc: Chris Mason
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Remove an unused global variable mce_entry and relative operations in
do_machine_check().Signed-off-by: Chen Yucong
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi
Cc: Wu Fengguang
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin"
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Compaction uses compact_checklock_irqsave() function to periodically check
for lock contention and need_resched() to either abort async compaction,
or to free the lock, schedule and retake the lock. When aborting,
cc->contended is set to signal the contended state to the caller. Two
problems have been identified in this mechanism.First, compaction also calls directly cond_resched() in both scanners when
no lock is yet taken. This call either does not abort async compaction,
or set cc->contended appropriately. This patch introduces a new
compact_should_abort() function to achieve both. In isolate_freepages(),
the check frequency is reduced to once by SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pageblocks to
match what the migration scanner does in the preliminary page checks. In
case a pageblock is found suitable for calling isolate_freepages_block(),
the checks within there are done on higher frequency.Second, isolate_freepages() does not check if isolate_freepages_block()
aborted due to contention, and advances to the next pageblock. This
violates the principle of aborting on contention, and might result in
pageblocks not being scanned completely, since the scanning cursor is
advanced. This problem has been noticed in the code by Joonsoo Kim when
reviewing related patches. This patch makes isolate_freepages_block()
check the cc->contended flag and abort.In case isolate_freepages() has already isolated some pages before
aborting due to contention, page migration will proceed, which is OK since
we do not want to waste the work that has been done, and page migration
has own checks for contention. However, we do not want another isolation
attempt by either of the scanners, so cc->contended flag check is added
also to compaction_alloc() and compact_finished() to make sure compaction
is aborted right after the migration.The outcome of the patch should be reduced lock contention by async
compaction and lower latencies for higher-order allocations where direct
compaction is involved.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo in comment]
Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Rik van Riel
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz
Tested-by: Shawn Guo
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman
Tested-by: Stephen Warren
Tested-by: Fabio Estevam
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Stephen Rothwell
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Fix checkpatch warning:
WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not requiredSigned-off-by: Fabian Frederick
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
...like other filesystems.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
hugetlbfs_i_mmap_mutex_key is only used in inode.c
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Currently, we use (zone->managed_pages + KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1)
/ KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO to avoid a zero gap value. It's better to
use DIV_ROUND_UP macro for neater code and clear meaning.Besides, the gap value is calculated against the per-zone "managed pages",
not "present pages". This patch also corrects the comment and do some
rephrasing.Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Acked-by: Rafael Aquini
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
mmdebug.h is included twice.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
alloc_huge_page() now mixes normal code path with error handle logic.
This patches move out the error handle logic, to make normal code path
more clean and redue code duplicate.Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The comment about pages under writeback is far from the relevant code, so
let's move it to the right place.Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi
Cc: Andi Kleen
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
If a page is marked for immediate reclaim then it is moved to the tail of
the LRU list. This occurs when the system is under enough memory pressure
for pages under writeback to reach the end of the LRU but we test for this
using atomic operations on every writeback. This patch uses an optimistic
non-atomic test first. It'll miss some pages in rare cases but the
consequences are not severe enough to warrant such a penalty.While the function does not dominate profiles during a simple dd test the
cost of it is reduced.73048 0.7428 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc5-mmotm-20140513 end_page_writeback
23740 0.2409 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc5-lessatomic end_page_writebackSigned-off-by: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
There is no need to calculate zone_idx(preferred_zone) multiple times
or use the pgdat to figure it out.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Acked-by: David Rientjes
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Dan Carpenter
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
aops->write_begin may allocate a new page and make it visible only to have
mark_page_accessed called almost immediately after. Once the page is
visible the atomic operations are necessary which is noticable overhead
when writing to an in-memory filesystem like tmpfs but should also be
noticable with fast storage. The objective of the patch is to initialse
the accessed information with non-atomic operations before the page is
visible.The bulk of filesystems directly or indirectly use
grab_cache_page_write_begin or find_or_create_page for the initial
allocation of a page cache page. This patch adds an init_page_accessed()
helper which behaves like the first call to mark_page_accessed() but may
called before the page is visible and can be done non-atomically.The primary APIs of concern in this care are the following and are used
by most filesystems.find_get_page
find_lock_page
find_or_create_page
grab_cache_page_nowait
grab_cache_page_write_beginAll of them are very similar in detail to the patch creates a core helper
pagecache_get_page() which takes a flags parameter that affects its
behavior such as whether the page should be marked accessed or not. Then
old API is preserved but is basically a thin wrapper around this core
function.Each of the filesystems are then updated to avoid calling
mark_page_accessed when it is known that the VM interfaces have already
done the job. There is a slight snag in that the timing of the
mark_page_accessed() has now changed so in rare cases it's possible a page
gets to the end of the LRU as PageReferenced where as previously it might
have been repromoted. This is expected to be rare but it's worth the
filesystem people thinking about it in case they see a problem with the
timing change. It is also the case that some filesystems may be marking
pages accessed that previously did not but it makes sense that filesystems
have consistent behaviour in this regard.The test case used to evaulate this is a simple dd of a large file done
multiple times with the file deleted on each iterations. The size of the
file is 1/10th physical memory to avoid dirty page balancing. In the
async case it will be possible that the workload completes without even
hitting the disk and will have variable results but highlight the impact
of mark_page_accessed for async IO. The sync results are expected to be
more stable. The exception is tmpfs where the normal case is for the "IO"
to not hit the disk.The test machine was single socket and UMA to avoid any scheduling or NUMA
artifacts. Throughput and wall times are presented for sync IO, only wall
times are shown for async as the granularity reported by dd and the
variability is unsuitable for comparison. As async results were variable
do to writback timings, I'm only reporting the maximum figures. The sync
results were stable enough to make the mean and stddev uninteresting.The performance results are reported based on a run with no profiling.
Profile data is based on a separate run with oprofile running.async dd
3.15.0-rc3 3.15.0-rc3
vanilla accessed-v2
ext3 Max elapsed 13.9900 ( 0.00%) 11.5900 ( 17.16%)
tmpfs Max elapsed 0.5100 ( 0.00%) 0.4900 ( 3.92%)
btrfs Max elapsed 12.8100 ( 0.00%) 12.7800 ( 0.23%)
ext4 Max elapsed 18.6000 ( 0.00%) 13.3400 ( 28.28%)
xfs Max elapsed 12.5600 ( 0.00%) 2.0900 ( 83.36%)The XFS figure is a bit strange as it managed to avoid a worst case by
sheer luck but the average figures looked reasonable.samples percentage
ext3 86107 0.9783 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla mark_page_accessed
ext3 23833 0.2710 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed
ext3 5036 0.0573 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
ext4 64566 0.8961 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla mark_page_accessed
ext4 5322 0.0713 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed
ext4 2869 0.0384 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
xfs 62126 1.7675 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla mark_page_accessed
xfs 1904 0.0554 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
xfs 103 0.0030 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed
btrfs 10655 0.1338 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla mark_page_accessed
btrfs 2020 0.0273 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
btrfs 587 0.0079 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed
tmpfs 59562 3.2628 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla mark_page_accessed
tmpfs 1210 0.0696 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
tmpfs 94 0.0054 vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed[akpm@linux-foundation.org: don't run init_page_accessed() against an uninitialised pointer]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Tested-by: Prabhakar Lad
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Discarding buffers uses a bunch of atomic operations when discarding
buffers because ...... I can't think of a reason. Use a cmpxchg loop to
clear all the necessary flags. In most (all?) cases this will be a single
atomic operations.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: move BUFFER_FLAGS_DISCARD into the .c file]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
When adding pages to the LRU we clear the active bit unconditionally.
As the page could be reachable from other paths we cannot use unlocked
operations without risk of corruption such as a parallel
mark_page_accessed. This patch tests if is necessary to clear the
active flag before using an atomic operation. This potentially opens a
tiny race when PageActive is checked as mark_page_accessed could be
called after PageActive was checked. The race already exists but this
patch changes it slightly. The consequence is that that the page may be
promoted to the active list that might have been left on the inactive
list before the patch. It's too tiny a race and too marginal a
consequence to always use atomic operations for.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
There should be no references to it any more and a parallel mark should
not be reordered against us. Use non-locked varient to clear page active.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
shmem_getpage_gfp uses an atomic operation to set the SwapBacked field
before it's even added to the LRU or visible. This is unnecessary as what
could it possible race against? Use an unlocked variant.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
cold is a bool, make it one. Make the likely case the "if" part of the
block instead of the else as according to the optimisation manual this is
preferred.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
X86 prefers the use of unsigned types for iterators and there is a
tendency to mix whether a signed or unsigned type if used for page order.
This converts a number of sites in mm/page_alloc.c to use unsigned int for
order where possible.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
get_pageblock_migratetype() is called during free with IRQs disabled.
This is unnecessary and disables IRQs for longer than necessary.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
In the free path we calculate page_to_pfn multiple times. Reduce that.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The test_bit operations in get/set pageblock flags are expensive. This
patch reads the bitmap on a word basis and use shifts and masks to isolate
the bits of interest. Similarly masks are used to set a local copy of the
bitmap and then use cmpxchg to update the bitmap if there have been no
other changes made in parallel.In a test running dd onto tmpfs the overhead of the pageblock-related
functions went from 1.27% in profiles to 0.5%.In addition to the performance benefits, this patch closes races that are
possible between:a) get_ and set_pageblock_migratetype(), where get_pageblock_migratetype()
reads part of the bits before and other part of the bits after
set_pageblock_migratetype() has updated them.b) set_pageblock_migratetype() and set_pageblock_skip(), where the non-atomic
read-modify-update set bit operation in set_pageblock_skip() will cause
lost updates to some bits changed in the set_pageblock_migratetype().Joonsoo Kim first reported the case a) via code inspection. Vlastimil
Babka's testing with a debug patch showed that either a) or b) occurs
roughly once per mmtests' stress-highalloc benchmark (although not
necessarily in the same pageblock). Furthermore during development of
unrelated compaction patches, it was observed that frequent calls to
{start,undo}_isolate_page_range() the race occurs several thousands of
times and has resulted in NULL pointer dereferences in move_freepages()
and free_one_page() in places where free_list[migratetype] is
manipulated by e.g. list_move(). Further debugging confirmed that
migratetype had invalid value of 6, causing out of bounds access to the
free_list array.That confirmed that the race exist, although it may be extremely rare,
and currently only fatal where page isolation is performed due to
memory hot remove. Races on pageblocks being updated by
set_pageblock_migratetype(), where both old and new migratetype are
lower MIGRATE_RESERVE, currently cannot result in an invalid value
being observed, although theoretically they may still lead to
unexpected creation or destruction of MIGRATE_RESERVE pageblocks.
Furthermore, things could get suddenly worse when memory isolation is
used more, or when new migratetypes are added.After this patch, the race has no longer been observed in testing.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim
Reported-and-tested-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK is set in a few cases. Always by kswapd, always for
__GFP_MEMALLOC, sometimes for swap-over-nfs, tasks etc. Each of these
cases are relatively rare events but the ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK check is an
unlikely branch in the fast path. This patch moves the check out of the
fast path and after it has been determined that the watermarks have not
been met. This helps the common fast path at the cost of making the slow
path slower and hitting kswapd with a performance cost. It's a reasonable
tradeoff.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Currently it's calculated once per zone in the zonelist.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
A node/zone index is used to check if pages are compatible for merging
but this happens unconditionally even if the buddy page is not free. Defer
the calculation as long as possible. Ideally we would check the zone boundary
but nodes can overlap.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
If cpusets are not in use then we still check a global variable on every
page allocation. Use jump labels to avoid the overhead.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Stephen Rothwell
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This patch exposes the jump_label reference count in preparation for the
next patch. cpusets cares about both the jump_label being enabled and how
many users of the cpusets there currently are.Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
If a zone cannot be used for a dirty page then it gets marked "full" which
is cached in the zlc and later potentially skipped by allocation requests
that have nothing to do with dirty zones.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The zlc is used on NUMA machines to quickly skip over zones that are full.
However it is always updated, even for the first zone scanned when the
zlc might not even be active. As it's a write to a bitmap that
potentially bounces cache line it's deceptively expensive and most
machines will not care. Only update the zlc if it was active.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Currently, on kmem_cache_destroy we delete the cache from the slab_list
before __kmem_cache_shutdown, inserting it back to the list on failure.
Initially, this was done, because we could release the slab_mutex in
__kmem_cache_shutdown to delete sysfs slub entry, but since commit
41a212859a4d ("slub: use sysfs'es release mechanism for kmem_cache") we
remove sysfs entry later in kmem_cache_destroy after dropping the
slab_mutex, so that no implementation of __kmem_cache_shutdown can ever
release the lock. Therefore we can simplify the code a bit by moving
list_del after __kmem_cache_shutdown.Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Pekka Enberg
Acked-by: David Rientjes
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Current names are rather inconsistent. Let's try to improve them.
Brief change log:
** old name ** ** new name **
kmem_cache_create_memcg memcg_create_kmem_cache
memcg_kmem_create_cache memcg_regsiter_cache
memcg_kmem_destroy_cache memcg_unregister_cachekmem_cache_destroy_memcg_children memcg_cleanup_cache_params
mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches memcg_unregister_all_cachescreate_work memcg_register_cache_work
memcg_create_cache_work_func memcg_register_cache_func
memcg_create_cache_enqueue memcg_schedule_register_cacheSigned-off-by: Vladimir Davydov
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Instead of calling an additional routine in dmam_pool_destroy() rely on
what dmam_pool_release() is doing.Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Some systems require a larger maximum PAGE_SIZE order for CMA allocations.
To accommodate such systems, increase the upper-bound of the
CMA_ALIGNMENT range to 12 (which ends up being 16MB on systems with 4K
pages).Signed-off-by: Marc Carino
Cc: Marek Szyprowski
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
