29 Jul, 2016
40 commits
-
The fair zone allocation policy interleaves allocation requests between
zones to avoid an age inversion problem whereby new pages are reclaimed
to balance a zone. Reclaim is now node-based so this should no longer
be an issue and the fair zone allocation policy is not free. This patch
removes it.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-30-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This is convenient when tracking down why the skip count is high because
it'll show what classzone kswapd woke up at and what zones are being
isolated.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-29-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The buffer_heads_over_limit limit in kswapd is inconsistent with direct
reclaim behaviour. It may force an an attempt to reclaim from all zones
and then not reclaim at all because higher zones were balanced than
required by the original request.This patch will causes kswapd to consider reclaiming from all zones if
buffer_heads_over_limit. However, if there are eligible zones for the
allocation request that woke kswapd then no reclaim will occur even if
buffer_heads_over_limit. This avoids kswapd over-reclaiming just
because buffer_heads_over_limit.[mgorman@techsingularity.net: fix comment about buffer_heads_over_limit]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1468404004-5085-2-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-28-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
As pointed out by Minchan Kim, the first call to prepare_kswapd_sleep()
always passes in 0 for `remaining' and the second call can trivially
check the parameter in advance.Suggested-by: Minchan Kim
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-27-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The scan_control structure has enough information available for
compaction_ready() to make a decision. The classzone_idx manipulations
in shrink_zones() are no longer necessary as the highest populated zone
is no longer used to determine if shrink_slab should be called or not.[mgorman@techsingularity.net remove redundant check in shrink_zones()]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1468588165-12461-3-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-26-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
shrink_node receives all information it needs about classzone_idx from
sc->reclaim_idx so remove the aliases.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-25-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
As reclaim is now per-node based, convert zone_reclaim to be
node_reclaim. It is possible that a node will be reclaimed multiple
times if it has multiple zones but this is unavoidable without caching
all nodes traversed so far. The documentation and interface to
userspace is the same from a configuration perspective and will will be
similar in behaviour unless the node-local allocation requests were also
limited to lower zones.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-24-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The ac_classzone_idx is used as the basis for waking kswapd and that is
based on the preferred zoneref. If the preferred zoneref's first zone
is lower than what is available on other nodes, it's possible that
kswapd is woken on a zone with only higher, but still eligible, zones.
As classzone_idx is strictly adhered to now, it causes a problem because
eligible pages are skipped.For example, node 0 has only DMA32 and node 1 has only NORMAL. An
allocating context running on node 0 may wake kswapd on node 1 telling
it to skip all NORMAL pages.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-23-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup
decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is
node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if
all zones are unbalanced for the requested classzone.Note that one node might be checked multiple times if the zonelist is
ordered by node because there is no cheap way of tracking what nodes
have already been visited. For zone-ordering, each node should be
checked only once.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-22-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
As reclaim is now node-based, it follows that page write activity due to
page reclaim should also be accounted for on the node. For consistency,
also account page writes and page dirtying on a per-node basis.After this patch, there are a few remaining zone counters that may appear
strange but are fine. NUMA stats are still per-zone as this is a
user-space interface that tools consume. NR_MLOCK, NR_SLAB_*,
NR_PAGETABLE, NR_KERNEL_STACK and NR_BOUNCE are all allocations that
potentially pin low memory and cannot trivially be reclaimed on demand.
This information is still useful for debugging a page allocation failure
warning.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-21-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
There are now a number of accounting oddities such as mapped file pages
being accounted for on the node while the total number of file pages are
accounted on the zone. This can be coped with to some extent but it's
confusing so this patch moves the relevant file-based accounted. Due to
throttling logic in the page allocator for reliable OOM detection, it is
still necessary to track dirty and writeback pages on a per-zone basis.[mgorman@techsingularity.net: fix NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING accounting]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1468404004-5085-5-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-20-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
NR_FILE_PAGES is the number of file pages.
NR_FILE_MAPPED is the number of mapped file pages.
NR_ANON_PAGES is the number of mapped anon pages.This is unhelpful naming as it's easy to confuse NR_FILE_MAPPED and
NR_ANON_PAGES for mapped pages. This patch renames NR_ANON_PAGES so we
haveNR_FILE_PAGES is the number of file pages.
NR_FILE_MAPPED is the number of mapped file pages.
NR_ANON_MAPPED is the number of mapped anon pages.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-19-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Reclaim makes decisions based on the number of pages that are mapped but
it's mixing node and zone information. Account NR_FILE_MAPPED and
NR_ANON_PAGES pages on the node.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-18-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Historically dirty pages were spread among zones but now that LRUs are
per-node it is more appropriate to consider dirty pages in a node.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-17-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hillf Danton
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Working set and refault detection is still zone-based, fix it.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-16-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Memcg needs adjustment after moving LRUs to the node. Limits are
tracked per memcg but the soft-limit excess is tracked per zone. As
global page reclaim is based on the node, it is easy to imagine a
situation where a zone soft limit is exceeded even though the memcg
limit is fine.This patch moves the soft limit tree the node. Technically, all the
variable names should also change but people are already familiar by the
meaning of "mz" even if "mn" would be a more appropriate name now.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-15-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Earlier patches focused on having direct reclaim and kswapd use data
that is node-centric for reclaiming but shrink_node() itself still uses
too much zone information. This patch removes unnecessary zone-based
information with the most important decision being whether to continue
reclaim or not. Some memcg APIs are adjusted as a result even though
memcg itself still uses some zone information.[mgorman@techsingularity.net: optimization]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1468588165-12461-2-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-14-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
kswapd scans from highest to lowest for a zone that requires balancing.
This was necessary when reclaim was per-zone to fairly age pages on
lower zones. Now that we are reclaiming on a per-node basis, any
eligible zone can be used and pages will still be aged fairly. This
patch avoids reclaiming excessively unless buffer_heads are over the
limit and it's necessary to reclaim from a higher zone than requested by
the waker of kswapd to relieve low memory pressure.[hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com: Force kswapd reclaim no more than needed]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466518566-30034-12-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-13-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Reclaim may stall if there is too much dirty or congested data on a
node. This was previously based on zone flags and the logic for
clearing the flags is in two places. As congestion/dirty tracking is
now tracked on a per-node basis, we can remove some duplicate logic.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-12-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Direct reclaim iterates over all zones in the zonelist and shrinking
them but this is in conflict with node-based reclaim. In the default
case, only shrink once per node.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-11-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
kswapd goes through some complex steps trying to figure out if it should
stay awake based on the classzone_idx and the requested order. It is
unnecessarily complex and passes in an invalid classzone_idx to
balance_pgdat(). What matters most of all is whether a larger order has
been requsted and whether kswapd successfully reclaimed at the previous
order. This patch irons out the logic to check just that and the end
result is less headache inducing.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-10-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The balance gap was introduced to apply equal pressure to all zones when
reclaiming for a higher zone. With node-based LRU, the need for the
balance gap is removed and the code is dead so remove it.[vbabka@suse.cz: Also remove KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-9-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Patch "mm: vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis" started
thinking of reclaim in terms of nodes but kswapd is still zone-centric.
This patch gets rid of many of the node-based versus zone-based
decisions.o A node is considered balanced when any eligible lower zone is balanced.
This eliminates one class of age-inversion problem because we avoid
reclaiming a newer page just because it's in the wrong zone
o pgdat_balanced disappears because we now only care about one zone being
balanced.
o Some anomalies related to writeback and congestion tracking being based on
zones disappear.
o kswapd no longer has to take care to reclaim zones in the reverse order
that the page allocator uses.
o Most importantly of all, reclaim from node 0 with multiple zones will
have similar aging and reclaiming characteristics as every
other node.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-8-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
kswapd checks all eligible zones to see if they need balancing even if
it was woken for a lower zone. This made sense when we reclaimed on a
per-zone basis because we wanted to shrink zones fairly so avoid
age-inversion problems. Ideally this is completely unnecessary when
reclaiming on a per-node basis. In theory, there may still be anomalies
when all requests are for lower zones and very old pages are preserved
in higher zones but this should be the exceptional case.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-7-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This patch makes reclaim decisions on a per-node basis. A reclaimer
knows what zone is required by the allocation request and skips pages
from higher zones. In many cases this will be ok because it's a
GFP_HIGHMEM request of some description. On 64-bit, ZONE_DMA32 requests
will cause some problems but 32-bit devices on 64-bit platforms are
increasingly rare. Historically it would have been a major problem on
32-bit with big Highmem:Lowmem ratios but such configurations are also
now rare and even where they exist, they are not encouraged. If it
really becomes a problem, it'll manifest as very low reclaim
efficiencies.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-6-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Zone padding separates write-intensive fields used by page allocation,
compaction and vmstats but the comments are a little misleading and need
clarification.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-5-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Hillf Danton
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This moves the LRU lists from the zone to the node and related data such
as counters, tracing, congestion tracking and writeback tracking.Unfortunately, due to reclaim and compaction retry logic, it is
necessary to account for the number of LRU pages on both zone and node
logic. Most reclaim logic is based on the node counters but the retry
logic uses the zone counters which do not distinguish inactive and
active sizes. It would be possible to leave the LRU counters on a
per-zone basis but it's a heavier calculation across multiple cache
lines that is much more frequent than the retry checks.Other than the LRU counters, this is mostly a mechanical patch but note
that it introduces a number of anomalies. For example, the scans are
per-zone but using per-node counters. We also mark a node as congested
when a zone is congested. This causes weird problems that are fixed
later but is easier to review.In the event that there is excessive overhead on 32-bit systems due to
the nodes being on LRU then there are two potential solutions1. Long-term isolation of highmem pages when reclaim is lowmem
When pages are skipped, they are immediately added back onto the LRU
list. If lowmem reclaim persisted for long periods of time, the same
highmem pages get continually scanned. The idea would be that lowmem
keeps those pages on a separate list until a reclaim for highmem pages
arrives that splices the highmem pages back onto the LRU. It potentially
could be implemented similar to the UNEVICTABLE list.That would reduce the skip rate with the potential corner case is that
highmem pages have to be scanned and reclaimed to free lowmem slab pages.2. Linear scan lowmem pages if the initial LRU shrink fails
This will break LRU ordering but may be preferable and faster during
memory pressure than skipping LRU pages.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-4-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Node-based reclaim requires node-based LRUs and locking. This is a
preparation patch that just moves the lru_lock to the node so later
patches are easier to review. It is a mechanical change but note this
patch makes contention worse because the LRU lock is hotter and direct
reclaim and kswapd can contend on the same lock even when reclaiming
from different zones.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-3-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Hillf Danton
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Patchset: "Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v9"
This series moves LRUs from the zones to the node. While this is a
current rebase, the test results were based on mmotm as of June 23rd.
Conceptually, this series is simple but there are a lot of details.
Some of the broad motivations for this are;1. The residency of a page partially depends on what zone the page was
allocated from. This is partially combatted by the fair zone allocation
policy but that is a partial solution that introduces overhead in the
page allocator paths.2. Currently, reclaim on node 0 behaves slightly different to node 1. For
example, direct reclaim scans in zonelist order and reclaims even if
the zone is over the high watermark regardless of the age of pages
in that LRU. Kswapd on the other hand starts reclaim on the highest
unbalanced zone. A difference in distribution of file/anon pages due
to when they were allocated results can result in a difference in
again. While the fair zone allocation policy mitigates some of the
problems here, the page reclaim results on a multi-zone node will
always be different to a single-zone node.
it was scheduled on as a result.3. kswapd and the page allocator scan zones in the opposite order to
avoid interfering with each other but it's sensitive to timing. This
mitigates the page allocator using pages that were allocated very recently
in the ideal case but it's sensitive to timing. When kswapd is allocating
from lower zones then it's great but during the rebalancing of the highest
zone, the page allocator and kswapd interfere with each other. It's worse
if the highest zone is small and difficult to balance.4. slab shrinkers are node-based which makes it harder to identify the exact
relationship between slab reclaim and LRU reclaim.The reason we have zone-based reclaim is that we used to have
large highmem zones in common configurations and it was necessary
to quickly find ZONE_NORMAL pages for reclaim. Today, this is much
less of a concern as machines with lots of memory will (or should) use
64-bit kernels. Combinations of 32-bit hardware and 64-bit hardware are
rare. Machines that do use highmem should have relatively low highmem:lowmem
ratios than we worried about in the past.Conceptually, moving to node LRUs should be easier to understand. The
page allocator plays fewer tricks to game reclaim and reclaim behaves
similarly on all nodes.The series has been tested on a 16 core UMA machine and a 2-socket 48
core NUMA machine. The UMA results are presented in most cases as the NUMA
machine behaved similarly.pagealloc
---------This is a microbenchmark that shows the benefit of removing the fair zone
allocation policy. It was tested uip to order-4 but only orders 0 and 1 are
shown as the other orders were comparable.4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4
mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9
Min total-odr0-1 490.00 ( 0.00%) 457.00 ( 6.73%)
Min total-odr0-2 347.00 ( 0.00%) 329.00 ( 5.19%)
Min total-odr0-4 288.00 ( 0.00%) 273.00 ( 5.21%)
Min total-odr0-8 251.00 ( 0.00%) 239.00 ( 4.78%)
Min total-odr0-16 234.00 ( 0.00%) 222.00 ( 5.13%)
Min total-odr0-32 223.00 ( 0.00%) 211.00 ( 5.38%)
Min total-odr0-64 217.00 ( 0.00%) 208.00 ( 4.15%)
Min total-odr0-128 214.00 ( 0.00%) 204.00 ( 4.67%)
Min total-odr0-256 250.00 ( 0.00%) 230.00 ( 8.00%)
Min total-odr0-512 271.00 ( 0.00%) 269.00 ( 0.74%)
Min total-odr0-1024 291.00 ( 0.00%) 282.00 ( 3.09%)
Min total-odr0-2048 303.00 ( 0.00%) 296.00 ( 2.31%)
Min total-odr0-4096 311.00 ( 0.00%) 309.00 ( 0.64%)
Min total-odr0-8192 316.00 ( 0.00%) 314.00 ( 0.63%)
Min total-odr0-16384 317.00 ( 0.00%) 315.00 ( 0.63%)
Min total-odr1-1 742.00 ( 0.00%) 712.00 ( 4.04%)
Min total-odr1-2 562.00 ( 0.00%) 530.00 ( 5.69%)
Min total-odr1-4 457.00 ( 0.00%) 433.00 ( 5.25%)
Min total-odr1-8 411.00 ( 0.00%) 381.00 ( 7.30%)
Min total-odr1-16 381.00 ( 0.00%) 356.00 ( 6.56%)
Min total-odr1-32 372.00 ( 0.00%) 346.00 ( 6.99%)
Min total-odr1-64 372.00 ( 0.00%) 343.00 ( 7.80%)
Min total-odr1-128 375.00 ( 0.00%) 351.00 ( 6.40%)
Min total-odr1-256 379.00 ( 0.00%) 351.00 ( 7.39%)
Min total-odr1-512 385.00 ( 0.00%) 355.00 ( 7.79%)
Min total-odr1-1024 386.00 ( 0.00%) 358.00 ( 7.25%)
Min total-odr1-2048 390.00 ( 0.00%) 362.00 ( 7.18%)
Min total-odr1-4096 390.00 ( 0.00%) 362.00 ( 7.18%)
Min total-odr1-8192 388.00 ( 0.00%) 363.00 ( 6.44%)This shows a steady improvement throughout. The primary benefit is from
reduced system CPU usage which is obvious from the overall times;4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4
mmotm-20160623nodelru-v8
User 189.19 191.80
System 2604.45 2533.56
Elapsed 2855.30 2786.39The vmstats also showed that the fair zone allocation policy was definitely
removed as can be seen here;4.7.0-rc3 4.7.0-rc3
mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v8
DMA32 allocs 28794729769 0
Normal allocs 48432501431 77227309877
Movable allocs 0 0tiobench on ext4
----------------tiobench is a benchmark that artifically benefits if old pages remain resident
while new pages get reclaimed. The fair zone allocation policy mitigates this
problem so pages age fairly. While the benchmark has problems, it is important
that tiobench performance remains constant as it implies that page aging
problems that the fair zone allocation policy fixes are not re-introduced.4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4
mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9
Min PotentialReadSpeed 89.65 ( 0.00%) 90.21 ( 0.62%)
Min SeqRead-MB/sec-1 82.68 ( 0.00%) 82.01 ( -0.81%)
Min SeqRead-MB/sec-2 72.76 ( 0.00%) 72.07 ( -0.95%)
Min SeqRead-MB/sec-4 75.13 ( 0.00%) 74.92 ( -0.28%)
Min SeqRead-MB/sec-8 64.91 ( 0.00%) 65.19 ( 0.43%)
Min SeqRead-MB/sec-16 62.24 ( 0.00%) 62.22 ( -0.03%)
Min RandRead-MB/sec-1 0.88 ( 0.00%) 0.88 ( 0.00%)
Min RandRead-MB/sec-2 0.95 ( 0.00%) 0.92 ( -3.16%)
Min RandRead-MB/sec-4 1.43 ( 0.00%) 1.34 ( -6.29%)
Min RandRead-MB/sec-8 1.61 ( 0.00%) 1.60 ( -0.62%)
Min RandRead-MB/sec-16 1.80 ( 0.00%) 1.90 ( 5.56%)
Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-1 76.41 ( 0.00%) 76.85 ( 0.58%)
Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-2 74.11 ( 0.00%) 73.54 ( -0.77%)
Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-4 80.05 ( 0.00%) 80.13 ( 0.10%)
Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-8 72.88 ( 0.00%) 73.20 ( 0.44%)
Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-16 75.91 ( 0.00%) 76.44 ( 0.70%)
Min RandWrite-MB/sec-1 1.18 ( 0.00%) 1.14 ( -3.39%)
Min RandWrite-MB/sec-2 1.02 ( 0.00%) 1.03 ( 0.98%)
Min RandWrite-MB/sec-4 1.05 ( 0.00%) 0.98 ( -6.67%)
Min RandWrite-MB/sec-8 0.89 ( 0.00%) 0.92 ( 3.37%)
Min RandWrite-MB/sec-16 0.92 ( 0.00%) 0.93 ( 1.09%)4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4
mmotm-20160623 approx-v9
User 645.72 525.90
System 403.85 331.75
Elapsed 6795.36 6783.67This shows that the series has little or not impact on tiobench which is
desirable and a reduction in system CPU usage. It indicates that the fair
zone allocation policy was removed in a manner that didn't reintroduce
one class of page aging bug. There were only minor differences in overall
reclaim activity4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4
mmotm-20160623nodelru-v8
Minor Faults 645838 647465
Major Faults 573 640
Swap Ins 0 0
Swap Outs 0 0
DMA allocs 0 0
DMA32 allocs 46041453 44190646
Normal allocs 78053072 79887245
Movable allocs 0 0
Allocation stalls 24 67
Stall zone DMA 0 0
Stall zone DMA32 0 0
Stall zone Normal 0 2
Stall zone HighMem 0 0
Stall zone Movable 0 65
Direct pages scanned 10969 30609
Kswapd pages scanned 93375144 93492094
Kswapd pages reclaimed 93372243 93489370
Direct pages reclaimed 10969 30609
Kswapd efficiency 99% 99%
Kswapd velocity 13741.015 13781.934
Direct efficiency 100% 100%
Direct velocity 1.614 4.512
Percentage direct scans 0% 0%kswapd activity was roughly comparable. There were differences in direct
reclaim activity but negligible in the context of the overall workload
(velocity of 4 pages per second with the patches applied, 1.6 pages per
second in the baseline kernel).pgbench read-only large configuration on ext4
---------------------------------------------pgbench is a database benchmark that can be sensitive to page reclaim
decisions. This also checks if removing the fair zone allocation policy
is safepgbench Transactions
4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4
mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v8
Hmean 1 188.26 ( 0.00%) 189.78 ( 0.81%)
Hmean 5 330.66 ( 0.00%) 328.69 ( -0.59%)
Hmean 12 370.32 ( 0.00%) 380.72 ( 2.81%)
Hmean 21 368.89 ( 0.00%) 369.00 ( 0.03%)
Hmean 30 382.14 ( 0.00%) 360.89 ( -5.56%)
Hmean 32 428.87 ( 0.00%) 432.96 ( 0.95%)Negligible differences again. As with tiobench, overall reclaim activity
was comparable.bonnie++ on ext4
----------------No interesting performance difference, negligible differences on reclaim
stats.paralleldd on ext4
------------------This workload uses varying numbers of dd instances to read large amounts of
data from disk.4.7.0-rc3 4.7.0-rc3
mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9
Amean Elapsd-1 186.04 ( 0.00%) 189.41 ( -1.82%)
Amean Elapsd-3 192.27 ( 0.00%) 191.38 ( 0.46%)
Amean Elapsd-5 185.21 ( 0.00%) 182.75 ( 1.33%)
Amean Elapsd-7 183.71 ( 0.00%) 182.11 ( 0.87%)
Amean Elapsd-12 180.96 ( 0.00%) 181.58 ( -0.35%)
Amean Elapsd-16 181.36 ( 0.00%) 183.72 ( -1.30%)4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4
mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9
User 1548.01 1552.44
System 8609.71 8515.08
Elapsed 3587.10 3594.54There is little or no change in performance but some drop in system CPU usage.
4.7.0-rc3 4.7.0-rc3
mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9
Minor Faults 362662 367360
Major Faults 1204 1143
Swap Ins 22 0
Swap Outs 2855 1029
DMA allocs 0 0
DMA32 allocs 31409797 28837521
Normal allocs 46611853 49231282
Movable allocs 0 0
Direct pages scanned 0 0
Kswapd pages scanned 40845270 40869088
Kswapd pages reclaimed 40830976 40855294
Direct pages reclaimed 0 0
Kswapd efficiency 99% 99%
Kswapd velocity 11386.711 11369.769
Direct efficiency 100% 100%
Direct velocity 0.000 0.000
Percentage direct scans 0% 0%
Page writes by reclaim 2855 1029
Page writes file 0 0
Page writes anon 2855 1029
Page reclaim immediate 771 1628
Sector Reads 293312636 293536360
Sector Writes 18213568 18186480
Page rescued immediate 0 0
Slabs scanned 128257 132747
Direct inode steals 181 56
Kswapd inode steals 59 1131It basically shows that kswapd was active at roughly the same rate in
both kernels. There was also comparable slab scanning activity and direct
reclaim was avoided in both cases. There appears to be a large difference
in numbers of inodes reclaimed but the workload has few active inodes and
is likely a timing artifact.stutter
-------stutter simulates a simple workload. One part uses a lot of anonymous
memory, a second measures mmap latency and a third copies a large file.
The primary metric is checking for mmap latency.stutter
4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4
mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v8
Min mmap 16.6283 ( 0.00%) 13.4258 ( 19.26%)
1st-qrtle mmap 54.7570 ( 0.00%) 34.9121 ( 36.24%)
2nd-qrtle mmap 57.3163 ( 0.00%) 46.1147 ( 19.54%)
3rd-qrtle mmap 58.9976 ( 0.00%) 47.1882 ( 20.02%)
Max-90% mmap 59.7433 ( 0.00%) 47.4453 ( 20.58%)
Max-93% mmap 60.1298 ( 0.00%) 47.6037 ( 20.83%)
Max-95% mmap 73.4112 ( 0.00%) 82.8719 (-12.89%)
Max-99% mmap 92.8542 ( 0.00%) 88.8870 ( 4.27%)
Max mmap 1440.6569 ( 0.00%) 121.4201 ( 91.57%)
Mean mmap 59.3493 ( 0.00%) 42.2991 ( 28.73%)
Best99%Mean mmap 57.2121 ( 0.00%) 41.8207 ( 26.90%)
Best95%Mean mmap 55.9113 ( 0.00%) 39.9620 ( 28.53%)
Best90%Mean mmap 55.6199 ( 0.00%) 39.3124 ( 29.32%)
Best50%Mean mmap 53.2183 ( 0.00%) 33.1307 ( 37.75%)
Best10%Mean mmap 45.9842 ( 0.00%) 20.4040 ( 55.63%)
Best5%Mean mmap 43.2256 ( 0.00%) 17.9654 ( 58.44%)
Best1%Mean mmap 32.9388 ( 0.00%) 16.6875 ( 49.34%)This shows a number of improvements with the worst-case outlier greatly
improved.Some of the vmstats are interesting
4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4
mmotm-20160623nodelru-v8
Swap Ins 163 502
Swap Outs 0 0
DMA allocs 0 0
DMA32 allocs 618719206 1381662383
Normal allocs 891235743 564138421
Movable allocs 0 0
Allocation stalls 2603 1
Direct pages scanned 216787 2
Kswapd pages scanned 50719775 41778378
Kswapd pages reclaimed 41541765 41777639
Direct pages reclaimed 209159 0
Kswapd efficiency 81% 99%
Kswapd velocity 16859.554 14329.059
Direct efficiency 96% 0%
Direct velocity 72.061 0.001
Percentage direct scans 0% 0%
Page writes by reclaim 6215049 0
Page writes file 6215049 0
Page writes anon 0 0
Page reclaim immediate 70673 90
Sector Reads 81940800 81680456
Sector Writes 100158984 98816036
Page rescued immediate 0 0
Slabs scanned 1366954 22683While this is not guaranteed in all cases, this particular test showed
a large reduction in direct reclaim activity. It's also worth noting
that no page writes were issued from reclaim context.This series is not without its hazards. There are at least three areas
that I'm concerned with even though I could not reproduce any problems in
that area.1. Reclaim/compaction is going to be affected because the amount of reclaim is
no longer targetted at a specific zone. Compaction works on a per-zone basis
so there is no guarantee that reclaiming a few THP's worth page pages will
have a positive impact on compaction success rates.2. The Slab/LRU reclaim ratio is affected because the frequency the shrinkers
are called is now different. This may or may not be a problem but if it
is, it'll be because shrinkers are not called enough and some balancing
is required.3. The anon/file reclaim ratio may be affected. Pages about to be dirtied are
distributed between zones and the fair zone allocation policy used to do
something very similar for anon. The distribution is now different but not
necessarily in any way that matters but it's still worth bearing in mind.VM statistic counters for reclaim decisions are zone-based. If the kernel
is to reclaim on a per-node basis then we need to track per-node
statistics but there is no infrastructure for that. The most notable
change is that the old node_page_state is renamed to
sum_zone_node_page_state. The new node_page_state takes a pglist_data and
uses per-node stats but none exist yet. There is some renaming such as
vm_stat to vm_zone_stat and the addition of vm_node_stat and the renaming
of mod_state to mod_zone_state. Otherwise, this is mostly a mechanical
patch with no functional change. There is a lot of similarity between the
node and zone helpers which is unfortunate but there was no obvious way of
reusing the code and maintaining type safety.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-2-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Hillf Danton
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Minchan Kim
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The helper early_page_nid_uninitialised() has been dead since commit
974a786e63c9 ("mm, page_alloc: remove MIGRATE_RESERVE") so remove the
dead code.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1468008031-3848-2-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Commit c0ff7453bb5c ("cpuset,mm: fix no node to alloc memory when
changing cpuset's mems") has added TIF_MEMDIE and PF_EXITING check but
it is checking the flag on the current task rather than the given one.This doesn't make much sense and it is actually wrong. If the current
task which updates the nodemask of a cpuset got killed by the OOM killer
then a part of the cpuset cgroup processes would have incompatible
nodemask which is surprising to say the least.The comment suggests the intention was to skip oom victim or an exiting
task so we should be checking the given task. But even then it would be
layering violation because it is the memory allocator to interpret the
TIF_MEMDIE meaning. Simply drop both checks. All tasks in the cpuset
should simply follow the same mask.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467029719-17602-3-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Miao Xie
Cc: Miao Xie
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
freezing_slow_path() is checking TIF_MEMDIE to skip OOM killed tasks.
It is, however, checking the flag on the current task rather than the
given one. This is really confusing because freezing() can be called
also on !current tasks. It would end up working correctly for its main
purpose because __refrigerator will be always called on the current task
so the oom victim will never get frozen. But it could lead to
surprising results when a task which is freezing a cgroup got oom killed
because only part of the cgroup would get frozen. This is highly
unlikely but worth fixing as the resulting code would be more clear
anyway.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467029719-17602-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Miao Xie
Cc: Miao Xie
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The caller __alloc_pages_direct_compact() already checked (order == 0)
so there's no need to check again.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465973568-3496-1-git-send-email-opensource.ganesh@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Mahendran
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz
Cc: Minchan Kim
Cc: Anshuman Khandual
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Commit 23047a96d7cf ("mm: workingset: per-cgroup cache thrash
detection") added a page->mem_cgroup lookup to the cache eviction,
refault, and activation paths, as well as locking to the activation
path, and the vm-scalability tests showed a regression of -23%.While the test in question is an artificial worst-case scenario that
doesn't occur in real workloads - reading two sparse files in parallel
at full CPU speed just to hammer the LRU paths - there is still some
optimizations that can be done in those paths.Inline the lookup functions to eliminate calls. Also, page->mem_cgroup
doesn't need to be stabilized when counting an activation; we merely
need to hold the RCU lock to prevent the memcg from being freed.This cuts down on overhead quite a bit:
23047a96d7cfcfca 063f6715e77a7be5770d6081fe
---------------- --------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
21621405 +- 0% +11.3% 24069657 +- 2% vm-scalability.throughput[linux@roeck-us.net: drop unnecessary include file]
[hannes@cmpxchg.org: add WARN_ON_ONCE()s]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160707194024.GA26580@cmpxchg.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160624175101.GA3024@cmpxchg.org
Reported-by: Ye Xiaolong
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
We need to assure the comment is consistent with the code.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466171914-21027-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
"mm, oom: fortify task_will_free_mem" has dropped task_lock around
task_will_free_mem in oom_kill_process bacause it assumed that a
potential race when the selected task exits will not be a problem as the
oom_reaper will call exit_oom_victim.Tetsuo was objecting that nommu doesn't have oom_reaper so the race
would be still possible. The code would be racy and lockup prone
theoretically in other aspects without the oom reaper anyway so I didn't
considered this a big deal. But it seems that further changes I am
planning in this area will benefit from stable task->mm in this path as
well. So let's drop find_lock_task_mm from task_will_free_mem and call
it from under task_lock as we did previously. Just pull the task->mm !=
NULL check inside the function.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467201562-6709-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Cc: David Rientjes
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The only case where the oom_reaper is not triggered for the oom victim
is when it shares the memory with a kernel thread (aka use_mm) or with
the global init. After "mm, oom: skip vforked tasks from being
selected" the victim cannot be a vforked task of the global init so we
are left with clone(CLONE_VM) (without CLONE_SIGHAND). use_mm() users
are quite rare as well.In order to help forward progress for the OOM killer, make sure that
this really rare case will not get in the way - we do this by hiding the
mm from the oom killer by setting MMF_OOM_REAPED flag for it.
oom_scan_process_thread will ignore any TIF_MEMDIE task if it has
MMF_OOM_REAPED flag set to catch these oom victims.After this patch we should guarantee forward progress for the OOM killer
even when the selected victim is sharing memory with a kernel thread or
global init as long as the victims mm is still alive.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466426628-15074-11-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
oom_reaper relies on the mmap_sem for read to do its job. Many places
which might block readers have been converted to use down_write_killable
and that has reduced chances of the contention a lot. Some paths where
the mmap_sem is held for write can take other locks and they might
either be not prepared to fail due to fatal signal pending or too
impractical to be changed.This patch introduces MMF_OOM_NOT_REAPABLE flag which gets set after the
first attempt to reap a task's mm fails. If the flag is present after
the failure then we set MMF_OOM_REAPED to hide this mm from the oom
killer completely so it can go and chose another victim.As a result a risk of OOM deadlock when the oom victim would be blocked
indefinetly and so the oom killer cannot make any progress should be
mitigated considerably while we still try really hard to perform all
reclaim attempts and stay predictable in the behavior.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466426628-15074-10-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The 0-day robot has encountered the following:
Out of memory: Kill process 3914 (trinity-c0) score 167 or sacrifice child
Killed process 3914 (trinity-c0) total-vm:55864kB, anon-rss:1512kB, file-rss:1088kB, shmem-rss:25616kB
oom_reaper: reaped process 3914 (trinity-c0), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:26488kB
oom_reaper: reaped process 3914 (trinity-c0), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:26900kB
oom_reaper: reaped process 3914 (trinity-c0), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:26900kB
oom_reaper: reaped process 3914 (trinity-c0), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:27296kB
oom_reaper: reaped process 3914 (trinity-c0), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:28148kBoom_reaper is trying to reap the same task again and again.
This is possible only when the oom killer is bypassed because of
task_will_free_mem because we skip over tasks with MMF_OOM_REAPED
already set during select_bad_process. Teach task_will_free_mem to skip
over MMF_OOM_REAPED tasks as well because they will be unlikely to free
anything more.Analyzed by Tetsuo Handa.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466426628-15074-9-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Cc: David Rientjes
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
task_will_free_mem is rather weak. It doesn't really tell whether the
task has chance to drop its mm. 98748bd72200 ("oom: consider
multi-threaded tasks in task_will_free_mem") made a first step into making
it more robust for multi-threaded applications so now we know that the
whole process is going down and probably drop the mm.This patch builds on top for more complex scenarios where mm is shared
between different processes - CLONE_VM without CLONE_SIGHAND, or in kernel
use_mm().Make sure that all processes sharing the mm are killed or exiting. This
will allow us to replace try_oom_reaper by wake_oom_reaper because
task_will_free_mem implies the task is reapable now. Therefore all paths
which bypass the oom killer are now reapable and so they shouldn't lock up
the oom killer.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466426628-15074-8-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
