21 May, 2016
11 commits
-
wait_iff_congested has been used to throttle allocator before it retried
another round of direct reclaim to allow the writeback to make some
progress and prevent reclaim from looping over dirty/writeback pages
without making any progress.We used to do congestion_wait before commit 0e093d99763e ("writeback: do
not sleep on the congestion queue if there are no congested BDIs or if
significant congestion is not being encountered in the current zone")
but that led to undesirable stalls and sleeping for the full timeout
even when the BDI wasn't congested. Hence wait_iff_congested was used
instead.But it seems that even wait_iff_congested doesn't work as expected. We
might have a small file LRU list with all pages dirty/writeback and yet
the bdi is not congested so this is just a cond_resched in the end and
can end up triggering pre mature OOM.This patch replaces the unconditional wait_iff_congested by
congestion_wait which is executed only if we _know_ that the last round
of direct reclaim didn't make any progress and dirty+writeback pages are
more than a half of the reclaimable pages on the zone which might be
usable for our target allocation. This shouldn't reintroduce stalls
fixed by 0e093d99763e because congestion_wait is called only when we are
getting hopeless when sleeping is a better choice than OOM with many
pages under IO.We have to preserve logic introduced by commit 373ccbe59270 ("mm,
vmstat: allow WQ concurrency to discover memory reclaim doesn't make any
progress") into the __alloc_pages_slowpath now that wait_iff_congested
is not used anymore. As the only remaining user of wait_iff_congested
is shrink_inactive_list we can remove the WQ specific short sleep from
wait_iff_congested because the sleep is needed to be done only once in
the allocation retry cycle.[mhocko@suse.com: high_zoneidx->ac_classzone_idx to evaluate memory reserves properly]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463051677-29418-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
__alloc_pages_slowpath has traditionally relied on the direct reclaim
and did_some_progress as an indicator that it makes sense to retry
allocation rather than declaring OOM. shrink_zones had to rely on
zone_reclaimable if shrink_zone didn't make any progress to prevent from
a premature OOM killer invocation - the LRU might be full of dirty or
writeback pages and direct reclaim cannot clean those up.zone_reclaimable allows to rescan the reclaimable lists several times
and restart if a page is freed. This is really subtle behavior and it
might lead to a livelock when a single freed page keeps allocator
looping but the current task will not be able to allocate that single
page. OOM killer would be more appropriate than looping without any
progress for unbounded amount of time.This patch changes OOM detection logic and pulls it out from shrink_zone
which is too low to be appropriate for any high level decisions such as
OOM which is per zonelist property. It is __alloc_pages_slowpath which
knows how many attempts have been done and what was the progress so far
therefore it is more appropriate to implement this logic.The new heuristic is implemented in should_reclaim_retry helper called
from __alloc_pages_slowpath. It tries to be more deterministic and
easier to follow. It builds on an assumption that retrying makes sense
only if the currently reclaimable memory + free pages would allow the
current allocation request to succeed (as per __zone_watermark_ok) at
least for one zone in the usable zonelist.This alone wouldn't be sufficient, though, because the writeback might
get stuck and reclaimable pages might be pinned for a really long time
or even depend on the current allocation context. Therefore there is a
backoff mechanism implemented which reduces the reclaim target after
each reclaim round without any progress. This means that we should
eventually converge to only NR_FREE_PAGES as the target and fail on the
wmark check and proceed to OOM. The backoff is simple and linear with
1/16 of the reclaimable pages for each round without any progress. We
are optimistic and reset counter for successful reclaim rounds.Costly high order pages mostly preserve their semantic and those without
__GFP_REPEAT fail right away while those which have the flag set will
back off after the amount of reclaimable pages reaches equivalent of the
requested order. The only difference is that if there was no progress
during the reclaim we rely on zone watermark check. This is more
logical thing to do than previous 1<
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
__alloc_pages_direct_compact communicates potential back off by two
variables:
- deferred_compaction tells that the compaction returned
COMPACT_DEFERRED
- contended_compaction is set when there is a contention on
zone->lock resp. zone->lru_lock locks__alloc_pages_slowpath then backs of for THP allocation requests to
prevent from long stalls. This is rather messy and it would be much
cleaner to return a single compact result value and hide all the nasty
details into __alloc_pages_direct_compact.This patch shouldn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
COMPACT_COMPLETE now means that compaction and free scanner met. This
is not very useful information if somebody just wants to use this
feedback and make any decisions based on that. The current caller might
be a poor guy who just happened to scan tiny portion of the zone and
that could be the reason no suitable pages were compacted. Make sure we
distinguish the full and partial zone walks.Consumers should treat COMPACT_PARTIAL_SKIPPED as a potential success
and be optimistic in retrying.The existing users of COMPACT_COMPLETE are conservatively changed to use
COMPACT_PARTIAL_SKIPPED as well but some of them should be probably
reconsidered and only defer the compaction only for COMPACT_COMPLETE
with the new semantic.This patch shouldn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
try_to_compact_pages() can currently return COMPACT_SKIPPED even when
the compaction is defered for some zone just because zone DMA is skipped
in 99% of cases due to watermark checks. This makes COMPACT_DEFERRED
basically unusable for the page allocator as a feedback mechanism.Make sure we distinguish those two states properly and switch their
ordering in the enum. This would mean that the COMPACT_SKIPPED will be
returned only when all eligible zones are skipped.As a result COMPACT_DEFERRED handling for THP in __alloc_pages_slowpath
will be more precise and we would bail out rather than reclaim.Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The compiler is complaining after "mm, compaction: change COMPACT_
constants into enum"mm/compaction.c: In function `compact_zone':
mm/compaction.c:1350:2: warning: enumeration value `COMPACT_DEFERRED' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
switch (ret) {
^
mm/compaction.c:1350:2: warning: enumeration value `COMPACT_COMPLETE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
mm/compaction.c:1350:2: warning: enumeration value `COMPACT_NO_SUITABLE_PAGE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
mm/compaction.c:1350:2: warning: enumeration value `COMPACT_NOT_SUITABLE_ZONE' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
mm/compaction.c:1350:2: warning: enumeration value `COMPACT_CONTENDED' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]compaction_suitable is allowed to return only COMPACT_PARTIAL,
COMPACT_SKIPPED and COMPACT_CONTINUE so other cases are simply
impossible. Put a VM_BUG_ON to catch an impossible return value.Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Compaction code is doing weird dances between COMPACT_FOO -> int ->
unsigned longBut there doesn't seem to be any reason for that. All functions which
return/use one of those constants are not expecting any other value so it
really makes sense to define an enum for them and make it clear that no
other values are expected.This is a pure cleanup and shouldn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Motivation:
As pointed out by Linus [2][3] relying on zone_reclaimable as a way to
communicate the reclaim progress is rater dubious. I tend to agree,
not only it is really obscure, it is not hard to imagine cases where a
single page freed in the loop keeps all the reclaimers looping without
getting any progress because their gfp_mask wouldn't allow to get that
page anyway (e.g. single GFP_ATOMIC alloc and free loop). This is rather
rare so it doesn't happen in the practice but the current logic which we
have is rather obscure and hard to follow a also non-deterministic.This is an attempt to make the OOM detection more deterministic and
easier to follow because each reclaimer basically tracks its own
progress which is implemented at the page allocator layer rather spread
out between the allocator and the reclaim. The more on the
implementation is described in the first patch.I have tested several different scenarios but it should be clear that
testing OOM killer is quite hard to be representative. There is usually
a tiny gap between almost OOM and full blown OOM which is often time
sensitive. Anyway, I have tested the following 2 scenarios and I would
appreciate if there are more to test.Testing environment: a virtual machine with 2G of RAM and 2CPUs without
any swap to make the OOM more deterministic.1) 2 writers (each doing dd with 4M blocks to an xfs partition with 1G
file size, removes the files and starts over again) running in
parallel for 10s to build up a lot of dirty pages when 100 parallel
mem_eaters (anon private populated mmap which waits until it gets
signal) with 80M each.This causes an OOM flood of course and I have compared both patched
and unpatched kernels. The test is considered finished after there
are no OOM conditions detected. This should tell us whether there are
any excessive kills or some of them premature (e.g. due to dirty pages):I have performed two runs this time each after a fresh boot.
* base kernel
$ grep "Out of memory:" base-oom-run1.log | wc -l
78
$ grep "Out of memory:" base-oom-run2.log | wc -l
78$ grep "Kill process" base-oom-run1.log | tail -n1
[ 91.391203] Out of memory: Kill process 3061 (mem_eater) score 39 or sacrifice child
$ grep "Kill process" base-oom-run2.log | tail -n1
[ 82.141919] Out of memory: Kill process 3086 (mem_eater) score 39 or sacrifice child$ grep "DMA32 free:" base-oom-run1.log | sed 's@.*free:\([0-9]*\)kB.*@\1@' | calc_min_max.awk
min: 5376.00 max: 6776.00 avg: 5530.75 std: 166.50 nr: 61
$ grep "DMA32 free:" base-oom-run2.log | sed 's@.*free:\([0-9]*\)kB.*@\1@' | calc_min_max.awk
min: 5416.00 max: 5608.00 avg: 5514.15 std: 42.94 nr: 52$ grep "DMA32.*all_unreclaimable? no" base-oom-run1.log | wc -l
1
$ grep "DMA32.*all_unreclaimable? no" base-oom-run2.log | wc -l
3* patched kernel
$ grep "Out of memory:" patched-oom-run1.log | wc -l
78
miso@tiehlicka /mnt/share/devel/miso/kvm $ grep "Out of memory:" patched-oom-run2.log | wc -l
77e grep "Kill process" patched-oom-run1.log | tail -n1
[ 497.317732] Out of memory: Kill process 3108 (mem_eater) score 39 or sacrifice child
$ grep "Kill process" patched-oom-run2.log | tail -n1
[ 316.169920] Out of memory: Kill process 3093 (mem_eater) score 39 or sacrifice child$ grep "DMA32 free:" patched-oom-run1.log | sed 's@.*free:\([0-9]*\)kB.*@\1@' | calc_min_max.awk
min: 5420.00 max: 5808.00 avg: 5513.90 std: 60.45 nr: 78
$ grep "DMA32 free:" patched-oom-run2.log | sed 's@.*free:\([0-9]*\)kB.*@\1@' | calc_min_max.awk
min: 5380.00 max: 6384.00 avg: 5520.94 std: 136.84 nr: 77e grep "DMA32.*all_unreclaimable? no" patched-oom-run1.log | wc -l
2
$ grep "DMA32.*all_unreclaimable? no" patched-oom-run2.log | wc -l
3The patched kernel run noticeably longer while invoking OOM killer same
number of times. This means that the original implementation is much
more aggressive and triggers the OOM killer sooner. free pages stats
show that neither kernels went OOM too early most of the time, though. I
guess the difference is in the backoff when retries without any progress
do sleep for a while if there is memory under writeback or dirty which
is highly likely considering the parallel IO.
Both kernels have seen races where zone wasn't marked unreclaimable
and we still hit the OOM killer. This is most likely a race where
a task managed to exit between the last allocation attempt and the oom
killer invocation.2) 2 writers again with 10s of run and then 10 mem_eaters to consume as much
memory as possible without triggering the OOM killer. This required a lot
of tuning but I've considered 3 consecutive runs in three different boots
without OOM as a success.* base kernel
size=$(awk '/MemFree/{printf "%dK", ($2/10)-(16*1024)}' /proc/meminfo)* patched kernel
size=$(awk '/MemFree/{printf "%dK", ($2/10)-(12*1024)}' /proc/meminfo)That means 40M more memory was usable without triggering OOM killer. The
base kernel sometimes managed to handle the same as patched but it
wasn't consistent and failed in at least on of the 3 runs. This seems
like a minor improvement.I was testing also GPF_REPEAT costly requests (hughetlb) with fragmented
memory and under memory pressure. The results are in patch 11 where the
logic is implemented. In short I can see huge improvement there.I am certainly interested in other usecases as well as well as any
feedback. Especially those which require higher order requests.This patch (of 14):
While playing with the oom detection rework [1] I have noticed that my
heavy order-9 (hugetlb) load close to OOM ended up in an endless loop
where the reclaim hasn't made any progress but did_some_progress didn't
reflect that and compaction_suitable was backing off because no zone is
above low wmark + 1 << order.It turned out that this is in fact an old standing bug in
compaction_ready which ignores the requested_highidx and did the
watermark check for 0 classzone_idx. This succeeds for zone DMA most
of the time as the zone is mostly unused because of lowmem protection.
As a result costly high order allocatios always report a successfull
progress even when there was none. This wasn't a problem so far
because these allocations usually fail quite early or retry only few
times with __GFP_REPEAT but this will change after later patch in this
series so make sure to not lie about the progress and propagate
requested_highidx down to compaction_ready and use it for both the
watermak check and compaction_suitable to fix this issue.[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459855533-4600-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/12/808
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/13/597Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Acked-by: Hillf Danton
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Mel Gorman
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Joonsoo Kim
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The inactive file list should still be large enough to contain readahead
windows and freshly written file data, but it no longer is the only
source for detecting multiple accesses to file pages. The workingset
refault measurement code causes recently evicted file pages that get
accessed again after a shorter interval to be promoted directly to the
active list.With that mechanism in place, we can afford to (on a larger system)
dedicate more memory to the active file list, so we can actually cache
more of the frequently used file pages in memory, and not have them
pushed out by streaming writes, once-used streaming file reads, etc.This can help things like database workloads, where only half the page
cache can currently be used to cache the database working set. This
patch automatically increases that fraction on larger systems, using the
same ratio that has already been used for anonymous memory.[hannes@cmpxchg.org: cgroup-awareness]
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Andres observed that his database workload is struggling with the
transaction journal creating pressure on frequently read pages.Access patterns like transaction journals frequently write the same
pages over and over, but in the majority of cases those pages are never
read back. There are no caching benefits to be had for those pages, so
activating them and having them put pressure on pages that do benefit
from caching is a bad choice.Leave page activations to read accesses and don't promote pages based on
writes alone.It could be said that partially written pages do contain cache-worthy
data, because even if *userspace* does not access the unwritten part,
the kernel still has to read it from the filesystem for correctness.
However, a counter argument is that these pages enjoy at least *some*
protection over other inactive file pages through the writeback cache,
in the sense that dirty pages are written back with a delay and cache
reclaim leaves them alone until they have been written back to disk.
Should that turn out to be insufficient and we see increased read IO
from partial writes under memory pressure, we can always go back and
update grab_cache_page_write_begin() to take (pos, len) so that it can
tell partial writes from pages that don't need partial reads. But for
now, keep it simple.Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This is a follow-up to
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg101739.html
where Andres reported his database workingset being pushed out by the
minimum size enforcement of the inactive file list - currently 50% of
cache - as well as repeatedly written file pages that are never actually
read.Two changes fell out of the discussions. The first change observes that
pages that are only ever written don't benefit from caching beyond what
the writeback cache does for partial page writes, and so we shouldn't
promote them to the active file list where they compete with pages whose
cached data is actually accessed repeatedly. This change comes in two
patches - one for in-cache write accesses and one for refaults triggered
by writes, neither of which should promote a cache page.Second, with the refault detection we don't need to set 50% of the cache
aside for used-once cache anymore since we can detect frequently used
pages even when they are evicted between accesses. We can allow the
active list to be bigger and thus protect a bigger workingset that isn't
challenged by streamers. Depending on the access patterns, this can
increase major faults during workingset transitions for better
performance during stable phases.This patch (of 3):
When rewriting a page, the data in that page is replaced with new data.
This means that evicting something else from the active file list, in
order to cache data that will be replaced by something else, is likely
to be a waste of memory.It is better to save the active list for frequently read pages, because
reads actually use the data that is in the page.This patch ignores partial writes, because it is unclear whether the
complexity of identifying those is worth any potential performance gain
obtained from better caching pages that see repeated partial writes at
large enough intervals to not get caught by the use-twice promotion code
used for the inactive file list.Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
20 May, 2016
29 commits
-
The page allocator fast path uses either the requested nodemask or
cpuset_current_mems_allowed if cpusets are enabled. If the allocation
context allows watermarks to be ignored then it can also ignore memory
policies. However, on entering the allocator slowpath the nodemask may
still be cpuset_current_mems_allowed and the policies are enforced.
This patch resets the nodemask appropriately before entering the
slowpath.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160504143628.GU2858@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Bad pages should be rare so the code handling them doesn't need to be
inline for performance reasons. Put it to separate function which
returns void. This also assumes that the initial page_expected_state()
result will match the result of the thorough check, i.e. the page
doesn't become "good" in the meanwhile. This matches the same
expectations already in place in free_pages_check().!DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter:
add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 134/-274 (-140)
function old new delta
check_new_page_bad - 134 +134
get_page_from_freelist 3468 3194 -274Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka
Acked-by: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The new free_pcp_prepare() function shares a lot of code with
free_pages_prepare(), which makes this a maintenance risk when some
future patch modifies only one of them. We should be able to achieve
the same effect (skipping free_pages_check() from !DEBUG_VM configs) by
adding a parameter to free_pages_prepare() and making it inline, so the
checks (and the order != 0 parts) are eliminated from the call from
free_pcp_prepare().!DEBUG_VM: bloat-o-meter reports no difference, as my gcc was already
inlining free_pages_prepare() and the elimination seems to work as
expectedDEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter:
add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 2/0 up/down: 1035/-778 (257)
function old new delta
__free_pages_ok 297 1060 +763
free_hot_cold_page 480 752 +272
free_pages_prepare 778 - -778Here inlining didn't occur before, and added some code, but it's ok for
a debug option.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Every page allocated checks a number of page fields for validity. This
catches corruption bugs of pages that are already freed but it is
expensive. This patch weakens the debugging check by checking PCP pages
only when the PCP lists are being refilled. All compound pages are
checked. This potentially avoids debugging checks entirely if the PCP
lists are never emptied and refilled so some corruption issues may be
missed. Full checking requires DEBUG_VM.With the two deferred debugging patches applied, the impact to a page
allocator microbenchmark is4.6.0-rc3 4.6.0-rc3
inline-v3r6 deferalloc-v3r7
Min alloc-odr0-1 344.00 ( 0.00%) 317.00 ( 7.85%)
Min alloc-odr0-2 248.00 ( 0.00%) 231.00 ( 6.85%)
Min alloc-odr0-4 209.00 ( 0.00%) 192.00 ( 8.13%)
Min alloc-odr0-8 181.00 ( 0.00%) 166.00 ( 8.29%)
Min alloc-odr0-16 168.00 ( 0.00%) 154.00 ( 8.33%)
Min alloc-odr0-32 161.00 ( 0.00%) 148.00 ( 8.07%)
Min alloc-odr0-64 158.00 ( 0.00%) 145.00 ( 8.23%)
Min alloc-odr0-128 156.00 ( 0.00%) 143.00 ( 8.33%)
Min alloc-odr0-256 168.00 ( 0.00%) 154.00 ( 8.33%)
Min alloc-odr0-512 178.00 ( 0.00%) 167.00 ( 6.18%)
Min alloc-odr0-1024 186.00 ( 0.00%) 174.00 ( 6.45%)
Min alloc-odr0-2048 192.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 6.25%)
Min alloc-odr0-4096 198.00 ( 0.00%) 184.00 ( 7.07%)
Min alloc-odr0-8192 200.00 ( 0.00%) 188.00 ( 6.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-16384 201.00 ( 0.00%) 188.00 ( 6.47%)
Min free-odr0-1 189.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 4.76%)
Min free-odr0-2 132.00 ( 0.00%) 126.00 ( 4.55%)
Min free-odr0-4 104.00 ( 0.00%) 99.00 ( 4.81%)
Min free-odr0-8 90.00 ( 0.00%) 85.00 ( 5.56%)
Min free-odr0-16 84.00 ( 0.00%) 80.00 ( 4.76%)
Min free-odr0-32 80.00 ( 0.00%) 76.00 ( 5.00%)
Min free-odr0-64 78.00 ( 0.00%) 74.00 ( 5.13%)
Min free-odr0-128 77.00 ( 0.00%) 73.00 ( 5.19%)
Min free-odr0-256 94.00 ( 0.00%) 91.00 ( 3.19%)
Min free-odr0-512 108.00 ( 0.00%) 112.00 ( -3.70%)
Min free-odr0-1024 115.00 ( 0.00%) 118.00 ( -2.61%)
Min free-odr0-2048 120.00 ( 0.00%) 125.00 ( -4.17%)
Min free-odr0-4096 123.00 ( 0.00%) 129.00 ( -4.88%)
Min free-odr0-8192 126.00 ( 0.00%) 130.00 ( -3.17%)
Min free-odr0-16384 126.00 ( 0.00%) 131.00 ( -3.97%)Note that the free paths for large numbers of pages is impacted as the
debugging cost gets shifted into that path when the page data is no
longer necessarily cache-hot.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Every page free checks a number of page fields for validity. This
catches premature frees and corruptions but it is also expensive. This
patch weakens the debugging check by checking PCP pages at the time they
are drained from the PCP list. This will trigger the bug but the site
that freed the corrupt page will be lost. To get the full context, a
kernel rebuild with DEBUG_VM is necessary.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
An important function for cpusets is cpuset_node_allowed(), which
optimizes on the fact if there's a single root CPU set, it must be
trivially allowed. But the check "nr_cpusets()
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Zefan Li
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The function call overhead of get_pfnblock_flags_mask() is measurable in
the page free paths. This patch uses an inlined version that is faster.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The original count is never reused so it can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Check without side-effects should be easier to maintain. It also
removes the duplicated cpupid and flags reset done in !DEBUG_VM variant
of both free_pcp_prepare() and then bulkfree_pcp_prepare(). Finally, it
enables the next patch.It shouldn't result in new branches, thanks to inlining of the check.
!DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter:
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-27 (-27)
function old new delta
__free_pages_ok 748 739 -9
free_pcppages_bulk 1403 1385 -18DEBUG_VM:
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-28 (-28)
function old new delta
free_pages_prepare 806 778 -28This is also slightly faster because cpupid information is not set on
tail pages so we can avoid resets there.Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
From: Vlastimil Babka
!DEBUG_VM size and bloat-o-meter:
add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 124/-370 (-246)
function old new delta
free_pages_check_bad - 124 +124
free_pcppages_bulk 1288 1171 -117
__free_pages_ok 948 695 -253DEBUG_VM:
add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 124/-214 (-90)
function old new delta
free_pages_check_bad - 124 +124
free_pages_prepare 1112 898 -214[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix whitespace]
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Every page allocated or freed is checked for sanity to avoid corruptions
that are difficult to detect later. A bad page could be due to a number
of fields. Instead of using multiple branches, this patch combines
multiple fields into a single branch. A detailed check is only
necessary if that check fails.4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2
initonce-v1r20 multcheck-v1r20
Min alloc-odr0-1 359.00 ( 0.00%) 348.00 ( 3.06%)
Min alloc-odr0-2 260.00 ( 0.00%) 254.00 ( 2.31%)
Min alloc-odr0-4 214.00 ( 0.00%) 213.00 ( 0.47%)
Min alloc-odr0-8 186.00 ( 0.00%) 186.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-16 173.00 ( 0.00%) 173.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-32 165.00 ( 0.00%) 166.00 ( -0.61%)
Min alloc-odr0-64 162.00 ( 0.00%) 162.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-128 161.00 ( 0.00%) 160.00 ( 0.62%)
Min alloc-odr0-256 170.00 ( 0.00%) 169.00 ( 0.59%)
Min alloc-odr0-512 181.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 0.55%)
Min alloc-odr0-1024 190.00 ( 0.00%) 188.00 ( 1.05%)
Min alloc-odr0-2048 196.00 ( 0.00%) 194.00 ( 1.02%)
Min alloc-odr0-4096 202.00 ( 0.00%) 199.00 ( 1.49%)
Min alloc-odr0-8192 205.00 ( 0.00%) 202.00 ( 1.46%)
Min alloc-odr0-16384 205.00 ( 0.00%) 203.00 ( 0.98%)Again, the benefit is marginal but avoiding excessive branches is
important. Ideally the paths would not have to check these conditions
at all but regrettably abandoning the tests would make use-after-free
bugs much harder to detect.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The classzone_idx can be inferred from preferred_zoneref so remove the
unnecessary field and save stack space.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The allocator fast path looks up the first usable zone in a zonelist and
then get_page_from_freelist does the same job in the zonelist iterator.
This patch preserves the necessary information.4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2
fastmark-v1r20 initonce-v1r20
Min alloc-odr0-1 364.00 ( 0.00%) 359.00 ( 1.37%)
Min alloc-odr0-2 262.00 ( 0.00%) 260.00 ( 0.76%)
Min alloc-odr0-4 214.00 ( 0.00%) 214.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-8 186.00 ( 0.00%) 186.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-16 173.00 ( 0.00%) 173.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-32 165.00 ( 0.00%) 165.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-64 161.00 ( 0.00%) 162.00 ( -0.62%)
Min alloc-odr0-128 159.00 ( 0.00%) 161.00 ( -1.26%)
Min alloc-odr0-256 168.00 ( 0.00%) 170.00 ( -1.19%)
Min alloc-odr0-512 180.00 ( 0.00%) 181.00 ( -0.56%)
Min alloc-odr0-1024 190.00 ( 0.00%) 190.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-2048 196.00 ( 0.00%) 196.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-4096 202.00 ( 0.00%) 202.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-8192 206.00 ( 0.00%) 205.00 ( 0.49%)
Min alloc-odr0-16384 206.00 ( 0.00%) 205.00 ( 0.49%)The benefit is negligible and the results are within the noise but each
cycle counts.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Watermarks have to be checked on every allocation including the number
of pages being allocated and whether reserves can be accessed. The
reserves only matter if memory is limited and the free_pages adjustment
only applies to high-order pages. This patch adds a shortcut for
order-0 pages that avoids numerous calculations if there is plenty of
free memory yielding the following performance difference in a page
allocator microbenchmark;4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2
optfair-v1r20 fastmark-v1r20
Min alloc-odr0-1 380.00 ( 0.00%) 364.00 ( 4.21%)
Min alloc-odr0-2 273.00 ( 0.00%) 262.00 ( 4.03%)
Min alloc-odr0-4 227.00 ( 0.00%) 214.00 ( 5.73%)
Min alloc-odr0-8 196.00 ( 0.00%) 186.00 ( 5.10%)
Min alloc-odr0-16 183.00 ( 0.00%) 173.00 ( 5.46%)
Min alloc-odr0-32 173.00 ( 0.00%) 165.00 ( 4.62%)
Min alloc-odr0-64 169.00 ( 0.00%) 161.00 ( 4.73%)
Min alloc-odr0-128 169.00 ( 0.00%) 159.00 ( 5.92%)
Min alloc-odr0-256 180.00 ( 0.00%) 168.00 ( 6.67%)
Min alloc-odr0-512 190.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 5.26%)
Min alloc-odr0-1024 198.00 ( 0.00%) 190.00 ( 4.04%)
Min alloc-odr0-2048 204.00 ( 0.00%) 196.00 ( 3.92%)
Min alloc-odr0-4096 209.00 ( 0.00%) 202.00 ( 3.35%)
Min alloc-odr0-8192 213.00 ( 0.00%) 206.00 ( 3.29%)
Min alloc-odr0-16384 214.00 ( 0.00%) 206.00 ( 3.74%)Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The fair zone allocation policy is not without cost but it can be
reduced slightly. This patch removes an unnecessary local variable,
checks the likely conditions of the fair zone policy first, uses a bool
instead of a flags check and falls through when a remote node is
encountered instead of doing a full restart. The benefit is marginal
but it's there4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2
decstat-v1r20 optfair-v1r20
Min alloc-odr0-1 377.00 ( 0.00%) 380.00 ( -0.80%)
Min alloc-odr0-2 273.00 ( 0.00%) 273.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-4 226.00 ( 0.00%) 227.00 ( -0.44%)
Min alloc-odr0-8 196.00 ( 0.00%) 196.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-16 183.00 ( 0.00%) 183.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-32 175.00 ( 0.00%) 173.00 ( 1.14%)
Min alloc-odr0-64 172.00 ( 0.00%) 169.00 ( 1.74%)
Min alloc-odr0-128 170.00 ( 0.00%) 169.00 ( 0.59%)
Min alloc-odr0-256 183.00 ( 0.00%) 180.00 ( 1.64%)
Min alloc-odr0-512 191.00 ( 0.00%) 190.00 ( 0.52%)
Min alloc-odr0-1024 199.00 ( 0.00%) 198.00 ( 0.50%)
Min alloc-odr0-2048 204.00 ( 0.00%) 204.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-4096 210.00 ( 0.00%) 209.00 ( 0.48%)
Min alloc-odr0-8192 213.00 ( 0.00%) 213.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-16384 214.00 ( 0.00%) 214.00 ( 0.00%)The benefit is marginal at best but one of the most important benefits,
avoiding a second search when falling back to another node is not
triggered by this particular test so the benefit for some corner cases
is understated.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The page allocator fast path checks page multiple times unnecessarily.
This patch avoids all the slowpath checks if the first allocation
attempt succeeds.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
When bulk freeing pages from the per-cpu lists the zone is checked for
isolated pageblocks on every release. This patch checks it once per
drain.[mgorman@techsingularity.net: fix locking radce, per Vlastimil]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
__GFP_HARDWALL only has meaning in the context of cpusets but the fast
path always applies the flag on the first attempt. Move the
manipulations into the cpuset paths where they will be masked by a
static branch in the common case.With the other micro-optimisations in this series combined, the impact
on a page allocator microbenchmark is4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2
decstat-v1r20 micro-v1r20
Min alloc-odr0-1 381.00 ( 0.00%) 377.00 ( 1.05%)
Min alloc-odr0-2 275.00 ( 0.00%) 273.00 ( 0.73%)
Min alloc-odr0-4 229.00 ( 0.00%) 226.00 ( 1.31%)
Min alloc-odr0-8 199.00 ( 0.00%) 196.00 ( 1.51%)
Min alloc-odr0-16 186.00 ( 0.00%) 183.00 ( 1.61%)
Min alloc-odr0-32 179.00 ( 0.00%) 175.00 ( 2.23%)
Min alloc-odr0-64 174.00 ( 0.00%) 172.00 ( 1.15%)
Min alloc-odr0-128 172.00 ( 0.00%) 170.00 ( 1.16%)
Min alloc-odr0-256 181.00 ( 0.00%) 183.00 ( -1.10%)
Min alloc-odr0-512 193.00 ( 0.00%) 191.00 ( 1.04%)
Min alloc-odr0-1024 201.00 ( 0.00%) 199.00 ( 1.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-2048 206.00 ( 0.00%) 204.00 ( 0.97%)
Min alloc-odr0-4096 212.00 ( 0.00%) 210.00 ( 0.94%)
Min alloc-odr0-8192 215.00 ( 0.00%) 213.00 ( 0.93%)
Min alloc-odr0-16384 216.00 ( 0.00%) 214.00 ( 0.93%)Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
page is guaranteed to be set before it is read with or without the
initialisation.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
zonelist here is a copy of a struct field that is used once. Ditch it.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The number of zones skipped to a zone expiring its fair zone allocation
quota is irrelevant. Convert to bool.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
alloc_flags is a bitmask of flags but it is signed which does not
necessarily generate the best code depending on the compiler. Even
without an impact, it makes more sense that this be unsigned.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Pageblocks have an associated bitmap to store migrate types and whether
the pageblock should be skipped during compaction. The bitmap may be
associated with a memory section or a zone but the zone is looked up
unconditionally. The compiler should optimise this away automatically
so this is a cosmetic patch only in many cases.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
__dec_zone_state is cheaper to use for removing an order-0 page as it
has fewer conditions to check.The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;
4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2
optiter-v1r20 decstat-v1r20
Min alloc-odr0-1 382.00 ( 0.00%) 381.00 ( 0.26%)
Min alloc-odr0-2 282.00 ( 0.00%) 275.00 ( 2.48%)
Min alloc-odr0-4 233.00 ( 0.00%) 229.00 ( 1.72%)
Min alloc-odr0-8 203.00 ( 0.00%) 199.00 ( 1.97%)
Min alloc-odr0-16 188.00 ( 0.00%) 186.00 ( 1.06%)
Min alloc-odr0-32 182.00 ( 0.00%) 179.00 ( 1.65%)
Min alloc-odr0-64 177.00 ( 0.00%) 174.00 ( 1.69%)
Min alloc-odr0-128 175.00 ( 0.00%) 172.00 ( 1.71%)
Min alloc-odr0-256 184.00 ( 0.00%) 181.00 ( 1.63%)
Min alloc-odr0-512 197.00 ( 0.00%) 193.00 ( 2.03%)
Min alloc-odr0-1024 203.00 ( 0.00%) 201.00 ( 0.99%)
Min alloc-odr0-2048 209.00 ( 0.00%) 206.00 ( 1.44%)
Min alloc-odr0-4096 214.00 ( 0.00%) 212.00 ( 0.93%)
Min alloc-odr0-8192 218.00 ( 0.00%) 215.00 ( 1.38%)
Min alloc-odr0-16384 219.00 ( 0.00%) 216.00 ( 1.37%)Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The page allocator iterates through a zonelist for zones that match the
addressing limitations and nodemask of the caller but many allocations
will not be restricted. Despite this, there is always functional call
overhead which builds up.This patch inlines the optimistic basic case and only calls the iterator
function for the complex case. A hindrance was the fact that
cpuset_current_mems_allowed is used in the fastpath as the allowed
nodemask even though all nodes are allowed on most systems. The patch
handles this by only considering cpuset_current_mems_allowed if a cpuset
exists. As well as being faster in the fast-path, this removes some
junk in the slowpath.The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;
4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2
statinline-v1r20 optiter-v1r20
Min alloc-odr0-1 412.00 ( 0.00%) 382.00 ( 7.28%)
Min alloc-odr0-2 301.00 ( 0.00%) 282.00 ( 6.31%)
Min alloc-odr0-4 247.00 ( 0.00%) 233.00 ( 5.67%)
Min alloc-odr0-8 215.00 ( 0.00%) 203.00 ( 5.58%)
Min alloc-odr0-16 199.00 ( 0.00%) 188.00 ( 5.53%)
Min alloc-odr0-32 191.00 ( 0.00%) 182.00 ( 4.71%)
Min alloc-odr0-64 187.00 ( 0.00%) 177.00 ( 5.35%)
Min alloc-odr0-128 185.00 ( 0.00%) 175.00 ( 5.41%)
Min alloc-odr0-256 193.00 ( 0.00%) 184.00 ( 4.66%)
Min alloc-odr0-512 207.00 ( 0.00%) 197.00 ( 4.83%)
Min alloc-odr0-1024 213.00 ( 0.00%) 203.00 ( 4.69%)
Min alloc-odr0-2048 220.00 ( 0.00%) 209.00 ( 5.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-4096 226.00 ( 0.00%) 214.00 ( 5.31%)
Min alloc-odr0-8192 229.00 ( 0.00%) 218.00 ( 4.80%)
Min alloc-odr0-16384 229.00 ( 0.00%) 219.00 ( 4.37%)perf indicated that next_zones_zonelist disappeared in the profile and
__next_zones_zonelist did not appear. This is expected as the
micro-benchmark would hit the inlined fast-path every time.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Cc: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
zone_statistics has one call-site but it's a public function. Make it
static and inline.The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;
4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2
statbranch-v1r20 statinline-v1r20
Min alloc-odr0-1 419.00 ( 0.00%) 412.00 ( 1.67%)
Min alloc-odr0-2 305.00 ( 0.00%) 301.00 ( 1.31%)
Min alloc-odr0-4 250.00 ( 0.00%) 247.00 ( 1.20%)
Min alloc-odr0-8 219.00 ( 0.00%) 215.00 ( 1.83%)
Min alloc-odr0-16 203.00 ( 0.00%) 199.00 ( 1.97%)
Min alloc-odr0-32 195.00 ( 0.00%) 191.00 ( 2.05%)
Min alloc-odr0-64 191.00 ( 0.00%) 187.00 ( 2.09%)
Min alloc-odr0-128 189.00 ( 0.00%) 185.00 ( 2.12%)
Min alloc-odr0-256 198.00 ( 0.00%) 193.00 ( 2.53%)
Min alloc-odr0-512 210.00 ( 0.00%) 207.00 ( 1.43%)
Min alloc-odr0-1024 216.00 ( 0.00%) 213.00 ( 1.39%)
Min alloc-odr0-2048 221.00 ( 0.00%) 220.00 ( 0.45%)
Min alloc-odr0-4096 227.00 ( 0.00%) 226.00 ( 0.44%)
Min alloc-odr0-8192 232.00 ( 0.00%) 229.00 ( 1.29%)
Min alloc-odr0-16384 232.00 ( 0.00%) 229.00 ( 1.29%)Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
zone_statistics has more branches than it really needs to take an
unlikely GFP flag into account. Reduce the number and annotate the
unlikely flag.The performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;
4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2
nocompound-v1r10 statbranch-v1r10
Min alloc-odr0-1 417.00 ( 0.00%) 419.00 ( -0.48%)
Min alloc-odr0-2 308.00 ( 0.00%) 305.00 ( 0.97%)
Min alloc-odr0-4 253.00 ( 0.00%) 250.00 ( 1.19%)
Min alloc-odr0-8 221.00 ( 0.00%) 219.00 ( 0.90%)
Min alloc-odr0-16 205.00 ( 0.00%) 203.00 ( 0.98%)
Min alloc-odr0-32 199.00 ( 0.00%) 195.00 ( 2.01%)
Min alloc-odr0-64 193.00 ( 0.00%) 191.00 ( 1.04%)
Min alloc-odr0-128 191.00 ( 0.00%) 189.00 ( 1.05%)
Min alloc-odr0-256 200.00 ( 0.00%) 198.00 ( 1.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-512 212.00 ( 0.00%) 210.00 ( 0.94%)
Min alloc-odr0-1024 219.00 ( 0.00%) 216.00 ( 1.37%)
Min alloc-odr0-2048 225.00 ( 0.00%) 221.00 ( 1.78%)
Min alloc-odr0-4096 231.00 ( 0.00%) 227.00 ( 1.73%)
Min alloc-odr0-8192 234.00 ( 0.00%) 232.00 ( 0.85%)
Min alloc-odr0-16384 234.00 ( 0.00%) 232.00 ( 0.85%)Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The PageAnon check always checks for compound_head but this is a
relatively expensive check if the caller already knows the page is a
head page. This patch creates a helper and uses it in the page free
path which only operates on head pages.With this patch and "Only check PageCompound for high-order pages", the
performance difference on a page allocator microbenchmark is;4.6.0-rc2 4.6.0-rc2
vanilla nocompound-v1r20
Min alloc-odr0-1 425.00 ( 0.00%) 417.00 ( 1.88%)
Min alloc-odr0-2 313.00 ( 0.00%) 308.00 ( 1.60%)
Min alloc-odr0-4 257.00 ( 0.00%) 253.00 ( 1.56%)
Min alloc-odr0-8 224.00 ( 0.00%) 221.00 ( 1.34%)
Min alloc-odr0-16 208.00 ( 0.00%) 205.00 ( 1.44%)
Min alloc-odr0-32 199.00 ( 0.00%) 199.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-64 195.00 ( 0.00%) 193.00 ( 1.03%)
Min alloc-odr0-128 192.00 ( 0.00%) 191.00 ( 0.52%)
Min alloc-odr0-256 204.00 ( 0.00%) 200.00 ( 1.96%)
Min alloc-odr0-512 213.00 ( 0.00%) 212.00 ( 0.47%)
Min alloc-odr0-1024 219.00 ( 0.00%) 219.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-2048 225.00 ( 0.00%) 225.00 ( 0.00%)
Min alloc-odr0-4096 230.00 ( 0.00%) 231.00 ( -0.43%)
Min alloc-odr0-8192 235.00 ( 0.00%) 234.00 ( 0.43%)
Min alloc-odr0-16384 235.00 ( 0.00%) 234.00 ( 0.43%)
Min free-odr0-1 215.00 ( 0.00%) 191.00 ( 11.16%)
Min free-odr0-2 152.00 ( 0.00%) 136.00 ( 10.53%)
Min free-odr0-4 119.00 ( 0.00%) 107.00 ( 10.08%)
Min free-odr0-8 106.00 ( 0.00%) 96.00 ( 9.43%)
Min free-odr0-16 97.00 ( 0.00%) 87.00 ( 10.31%)
Min free-odr0-32 91.00 ( 0.00%) 83.00 ( 8.79%)
Min free-odr0-64 89.00 ( 0.00%) 81.00 ( 8.99%)
Min free-odr0-128 88.00 ( 0.00%) 80.00 ( 9.09%)
Min free-odr0-256 106.00 ( 0.00%) 95.00 ( 10.38%)
Min free-odr0-512 116.00 ( 0.00%) 111.00 ( 4.31%)
Min free-odr0-1024 125.00 ( 0.00%) 118.00 ( 5.60%)
Min free-odr0-2048 133.00 ( 0.00%) 126.00 ( 5.26%)
Min free-odr0-4096 136.00 ( 0.00%) 130.00 ( 4.41%)
Min free-odr0-8192 138.00 ( 0.00%) 130.00 ( 5.80%)
Min free-odr0-16384 137.00 ( 0.00%) 130.00 ( 5.11%)There is a sizable boost to the free allocator performance. While there
is an apparent boost on the allocation side, it's likely a co-incidence
or due to the patches slightly reducing cache footprint.Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
