16 Dec, 2011
5 commits
-
I've been hitting this BUG_ON() in btrfs_orphan_add when running xfstest 269 in
a loop. This is because we will add an orphan item, do the truncate, the
truncate will fail for whatever reason (*cough*ENOSPC*cough*) and then we're
left with an orphan item still in the fs. Then we come back later to do another
truncate and it blows up because we already have an orphan item. This is ok so
just fix the BUG_ON() to only BUG() if ret is not EEXIST. Thanks,Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
-
We were occasionaly leaking space when running xfstest 269. This is because if
we failed to start the transaction in the truncate loop we'd just goto out, but
we need to break so that the inode is removed from the orphan list and the space
is properly freed. Thanks,Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
-
Running xfstests 269 with some tracing my scripts kept spitting out errors about
releasing bytes that we didn't actually have reserved. This took me down a huge
rabbit hole and it turns out the way we deal with reserved_extents is wrong,
we need to only be setting it if the reservation succeeds, otherwise the free()
method will come in and unreserve space that isn't actually reserved yet, which
can lead to other warnings and such. The math was all working out right in the
end, but it caused all sorts of other issues in addition to making my scripts
yell and scream and generally make it impossible for me to track down the
original issue I was looking for. The other problem is with our error handling
in the reservation code. There are two cases that we need to deal with1) We raced with free. In this case free won't free anything because csum_bytes
is modified before we dro the lock in our reservation path, so free rightly
doesn't release any space because the reservation code may be depending on that
reservation. However if we fail, we need the reservation side to do the free at
that point since that space is no longer in use. So as it stands the code was
doing this fine and it worked out, except in case #22) We don't race with free. Nobody comes in and changes anything, and our
reservation fails. In this case we didn't reserve anything anyway and we just
need to clean up csum_bytes but not free anything. So we keep track of
csum_bytes before we drop the lock and if it hasn't changed we know we can just
decrement csum_bytes and carry on.Because of the case where we can race with free()'s since we have to drop our
spin_lock to do the reservation, I'm going to serialize all reservations with
the i_mutex. We already get this for free in the heavy use paths, truncate and
file write all hold the i_mutex, just needed to add it to page_mkwrite and
various ioctl/balance things. With this patch my space leak scripts no longer
scream bloody murder. Thanks,Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
-
Now that we're properly keeping track of delayed inode space we've been getting
a lot of warnings out of btrfs_dirty_inode() when running xfstest 83. This is
because a bunch of people call mark_inode_dirty, which is void so we can't
return ENOSPC. This needs to be fixed in a few areas1) file_update_time - this updates the mtime and such when writing to a file,
which will call mark_inode_dirty. So copy file_update_time into btrfs so we can
call btrfs_dirty_inode directly and return an error if we get one appropriately.2) fix symlinks to use btrfs_setattr for ->setattr. For some reason we weren't
setting ->setattr for symlinks, even though we should have been. This catches
one of the cases where we were getting errors in mark_inode_dirty.3) Fix btrfs_setattr and btrfs_setsize to call btrfs_dirty_inode directly
instead of mark_inode_dirty. This lets us return errors properly for truncate
and chown/anything related to setattr.4) Add a new btrfs_fs_dirty_inode which will just call btrfs_dirty_inode and
print an error if we have one. The only remaining user we can't control for
this is touch_atime(), but we don't really want to keep people from walking
down the tree if we don't have space to save the atime update, so just complain
but don't worry about it.With this patch xfstests 83 complains a handful of times instead of hundreds of
times. Thanks,Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
-
Al pointed out we have some random problems with the way we account for
num_workers_starting in the async thread stuff. First of all we need to make
sure to decrement num_workers_starting if we fail to start the worker, so make
__btrfs_start_workers do this. Also fix __btrfs_start_workers so that it
doesn't call btrfs_stop_workers(), there is no point in stopping everybody if we
failed to create a worker. Also check_pending_worker_creates needs to call
__btrfs_start_work in it's work function since it already increments
num_workers_starting.People only start one worker at a time, so get rid of the num_workers argument
everywhere, and make btrfs_queue_worker a void since it will always succeed.
Thanks,Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
10 Dec, 2011
1 commit
-
btrfs_end_bio checks the number of errors on a bio against the max
number of errors allowed before sending any EIOs up to the higher
levels.If we got enough copies of the bio done for a given raid level, it is
supposed to clear the bio error flag and return success.We have pointers to the original bio sent down by the higher layers and
pointers to any cloned bios we made for raid purposes. If the original
bio happens to be the one that got an io error, but not the last one to
finish, it might not have the BIO_UPTODATE bit set.Then, when the last bio does finish, we'll call bio_end_io on the
original bio. It won't have the uptodate bit set and we'll end up
sending EIO to the higher layers.We already had a check for this, it just was conditional on getting the
IO error on the very last bio. Make the check unconditional so we eat
the EIOs properly.Signed-off-by: Chris Mason
08 Dec, 2011
4 commits
-
Drop spin lock in convert_extent_bit() when memory alloc fails,
otherwise, it will be a deadlock.Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
If we call ioctl(BTRFS_IOC_ADD_DEV) directly, we'll succeed in adding
a readonly device to a btrfs filesystem, and btrfs will write to
that device, emitting kernel errors:[ 3109.833692] lost page write due to I/O error on loop2
[ 3109.833720] lost page write due to I/O error on loop2
...Signed-off-by: Li Zefan
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
When we find an existing cluster, we switch to its block group as the
current block group, possibly skipping multiple blocks in the process.
Furthermore, under heavy contention, multiple threads may fail to
allocate from a cluster and then release just-created clusters just to
proceed to create new ones in a different block group.This patch tries to allocate from an existing cluster regardless of its
block group, and doesn't switch to that group, instead proceeding to
try to allocate a cluster from the group it was iterating before the
attempt.Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
If we reach LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE, we won't even try to use a cluster that
others might have set up. Odds are that there won't be one, but if
someone else succeeded in setting it up, we might as well use it, even
if we don't try to set up a cluster again.Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason
01 Dec, 2011
11 commits
-
Commit 4a54c8c16 introduced raid-repair, killing the individual
readpage_io_failed_hook entries from inode.c and disk-io.c. Commit
4bb31e92 introduced new readahead code, adding a readpage_io_failed_hook to
disk-io.c.The raid-repair commit had logic to disable raid-repair, if
readpage_io_failed_hook is set. Thus, the readahead commit effectively
disabled raid-repair for meta data.This commit changes the logic to always attempt raid-repair when needed and
call the readpage_io_failed_hook in case raid-repair fails. This is much
more straight forward and should have been like that from the beginning.Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt
Reported-by: Stefan Behrens
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
If we don't have a cluster, don't bother trying to allocate from it,
jumping right away to the attempt to allocate a new cluster.Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
We test whether a block group has enough free space to hold the
requested block, but when we're doing clustered allocation, we can
save some cycles by testing whether it has enough room for the cluster
upfront, otherwise we end up attempting to set up a cluster and
failing. Only in the NO_EMPTY_SIZE loop do we attempt an unclustered
allocation, and by then we'll have zeroed the cluster size, so this
patch won't stop us from using the block group as a last resort.Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
Instead of starting at zero (offset is always zero), request a cluster
starting at search_start, that denotes the beginning of the current
block group.Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
The field that indicates the size of the largest contiguous chunk of
free space in the cluster is not initialized when setting up bitmaps,
it's only increased when we find a larger contiguous chunk. We end up
retaining a larger value than appropriate for highly-fragmented
clusters, which may cause pointless searches for large contiguous
groups, and even cause clusters that do not meet the density
requirements to be set up.Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
We're failing to create clusters with bitmaps because
setup_cluster_no_bitmap checks that the list is empty before inserting
the bitmap entry in the list for setup_cluster_bitmap, but the list
field is only initialized when it is restored from the on-disk free
space cache, or when it is written out to disk.Besides a potential race condition due to the multiple use of the list
field, filesystem performance severely degrades over time: as we use
up all non-bitmap free extents, the try-to-set-up-cluster dance is
done at every metadata block allocation. For every block group, we
fail to set up a cluster, and after failing on them all up to twice,
we fall back to the much slower unclustered allocation.To make matters worse, before the unclustered allocation, we try to
create new block groups until we reach the 1% threshold, which
introduces additional bitmaps and thus block groups that we'll iterate
over at each metadata block request. -
To reproduce this bug:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=img bs=1M count=256
# mkfs.btrfs img
# losetup -r /dev/loop1 img
# mount /dev/loop1 /mnt
OOPS!!It triggered BUG_ON(!nr_devices) in btrfs_calc_avail_data_space().
To fix this, instead of checking write-only devices, we check all open
deivces:# df -h /dev/loop1
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/loop1 250M 28K 238M 1% /mntSigned-off-by: Li Zefan
-
It seems overly harsh to fail a resize of a btrfs file system to the
same size when a shrink or grow would succeed. User app GParted trips
over this error. Allow it by bypassing the shrink or grow operation.Signed-off-by: Mike Fleetwood
-
When I ran the xfstests, I found the test tasks was blocked on meta-data
reservation.By debugging, I found the reason of this bug:
start transaction
|
v
reserve meta-data space
|
v
flush delay allocation -> iput inode -> evict inode
^ |
| v
wait for delay allocation flush -
The location of the btrfs-progs repository has been changed.
This patch updates the documentation accordingly.Signed-off-by: Arnd Hannemann
-
init_ipath() can return an ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM).
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
22 Nov, 2011
1 commit
-
The log replay code only partially loads block groups, since
the block group caching code is able to detect and deal with
extents the logging code has pinned down.While the logging code is pinning down block groups, there is
a bogus WARN_ON we're hitting if the code wasn't able to find
an extent in the cache. This commit removes the warning because
it can happen any time there isn't a valid free space cache
for that block group.Signed-off-by: Chris Mason
20 Nov, 2011
10 commits
-
We've been hitting BUG()'s in btrfs_cont_expand and btrfs_fallocate and anywhere
else that calls btrfs_get_extent while running xfstests 13 in a loop. This is
because fiemap is calling btrfs_get_extent with non-sectorsize aligned offsets,
which will end up adding mappings that are not sectorsize aligned, which will
cause problems in some cases for subsequent calls to btrfs_get_extent for
similar areas that are sectorsize aligned. With this patch I ran xfstests 13 in
a loop for a couple of hours and didn't hit the problem that I could previously
hit in at most 20 minutes. Thanks,Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
-
When doing the io_ctl helpers to clean up the free space cache stuff I stopped
using our normal prepare_pages stuff, which means I of course forgot to do
things like set the pages extent mapped, which will cause us all sorts of
wonderful propblems. Thanks,Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
-
We've been hitting panics when running xfstest 13 in a loop for long periods of
time. And actually this problem has always existed so we've been hitting these
things randomly for a while. Basically what happens is we get a thread coming
into the allocator and reading the space cache off of disk and adding the
entries to the free space cache as we go. Then we get another thread that comes
in and tries to allocate from that block group. Since block_group->cached !=
BTRFS_CACHE_NO it goes ahead and tries to do the allocation. We do this because
if we're doing the old slow way of caching we don't want to hold people up and
wait for everything to finish. The problem with this is we could end up
discarding the space cache at some arbitrary point in the future, which means we
could very well end up allocating space that is either bad, or when the real
caching happens it could end up thinking the space isn't in use when it really
is and cause all sorts of other problems.The solution is to add a new flag to indicate we are loading the free space
cache from disk, and always try to cache the block group if cache->cached !=
BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED. That way if we are loading the space cache anybody else
who tries to allocate from the block group will have to wait until it's finished
to make sure it completes successfully. Thanks,Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
-
For the user it is confusing to find something like:
[10197.627710] new size for /dev/mapper/vg0-usr_share is 3221225472
in kernel log, because it doesn't point directly to btrfs.This patch prefixes those messages with "btrfs:" like other btrfs
related printks.Signed-off-by: Arnd Hannemann
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
Round inode bytes and delalloc bytes up to real blocksize before
converting to sector size. Otherwise eg. files smaller than 512
are reported with zero blocks due to incorrect rounding.Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
setup_cluster_no_bitmap() searches all the extents and bitmaps starting
from offset. Therefore if it returns -ENOSPC, all the bitmaps starting
from offset are in the bitmaps list, so it's sufficient to search from
this list in setup_cluser_bitmap().Signed-off-by: Li Zefan
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
Suppose there are two bitmaps [0, 256], [256, 512] and one extent
[100, 120] in the free space cache, and we want to setup a cluster
with offset=100, bytes=50.In this case, there will be only one bitmap [256, 512] in the temporary
bitmaps list, and then setup_cluster_bitmap() won't search bitmap [0, 256].The cause is, the list is constructed in setup_cluster_no_bitmap(),
and only bitmaps with bitmap_entry->offset >= offset will be added
into the list, and the very bitmap that convers offset has
bitmap_entry->offset
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
My previous patch introduced some u64 for failed_mirror variables, this one
makes it consistent again.Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
This patch casts to unsigned long before casting to a pointer and fixes
the following warnings:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2289:20: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2933:37: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2937:21: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3020:21: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
fs/btrfs/scrub.c:275:4: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
fs/btrfs/backref.c:686:27: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
When btrfs is writing the super blocks, it send barrier flushes to make
sure writeback caching drives get all the metadata on disk in the
right order.But, we have two bugs in the way these are sent down. When doing
full commits (not via the tree log), we are sending the barrier down
before the last super when it should be going down before the first.In multi-device setups, we should be waiting for the barriers to
complete on all devices before writing any of the supers.Both of these bugs can cause corruptions on power failures. We fix it
with some new code to send down empty barriers to all devices before
writing the first super.Alexandre Oliva found the multi-device bug. Arne Jansen did the async
barrier loop.Signed-off-by: Chris Mason
Reported-by: Alexandre Oliva
15 Nov, 2011
1 commit
-
The btrfs snapshotting code requires that once a root has been
snapshotted, we don't change it during a commit.But there are two cases to lead to tree corruptions:
1) multi-thread snapshots can commit serveral snapshots in a transaction,
and this may change the src root when processing the following pending
snapshots, which lead to the former snapshots corruptions;2) the free inode cache was changing the roots when it root the cache,
which lead to corruptions.This fixes things by making sure we force COW the block after we create a
snapshot during commiting a transaction, then any changes to the roots
will result in COW, and we get all the fs roots and snapshot roots to be
consistent.Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason
11 Nov, 2011
7 commits
-
Rename no_space_cache option to nospace_cache to be more consistent with
the rest, where the simple prefix 'no' is used to negate an option.The option has been introduced during the -rc1 cycle and there are has not been
widely used, so it's safe.Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
Currently scrub fails with ENOMEM when bio_add_page fails. Unfortunately
dm based targets accept only one page per bio, thus making scrub always
fails. This patch just submits the current bio when an error is encountered
and starts a new one.Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
We can not do flushable reservation for the relocation when we create snapshot,
because it may make the transaction commit task and the flush task wait for
each other and the deadlock happens.Signed-off-by: Miao Xie
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
People have been running into a warning when loading space cache because the
page is already mapped when trying to read in a bitmap. The way we read in
entries and pages is kind of convoluted, so fix it so that io_ctl_read_entry
maps the entries if it needs to, and if it hits the end of the page it simply
unmaps the page. That way we can unconditionally unmap the io_ctl before
reading in the bitmap and we should stop hitting these warnings. Thanks,Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
If the root node of a fs/file tree is in the block group that is
being relocated, but the others are not in the other block groups.
when we create a snapshot for this tree between the relocation tree
creation ends and ->create_reloc_tree is set to 0, Btrfs will create
some backref nodes that are the lowest nodes of the backrefs cache.
But we forget to add them into ->leaves list of the backref cache
and deal with them, and at last, they will triggered BUG_ON().kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:239!
This patch fixes it by adding them into ->leaves list of backref cache.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
btrfs_block_rsv_add{, _noflush}() have similar code, so abstract that code.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason -
When we did stress test for the space relocation, the deadlock happened.
By debugging, We found it was caused by the carelessness that we forgot
to unlock the read lock of the extent buffers in btrfs_orphan_cleanup()
before we end the transaction handle, so the transaction commit task waited
the task, which called btrfs_orphan_cleanup(), to unlock the extent buffer,
but that task waited the commit task to end the transaction commit, and
the deadlock happened. Fix it.Signed-ff-by: Miao Xie
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason
