01 Aug, 2019
1 commit
-
Manually convert the two PA-RISC documents to ReST, adding them
to the Linux documentation body.Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet
10 Sep, 2018
1 commit
-
This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of all files present
in a directory, but these files are horribly out of date and their
usefulness is brought into question. Often a simple "ls" would reveal
the same information as the filenames are generally quite descriptive as
a short introduction to what the file covers (it should not surprise
anyone what Documentation/sched/sched-design-CFS.txt covers)A few years back it was mentioned that these files were no longer really
needed, and they have since then grown further out of date, so perhaps
it is time to just throw them out.A short status yields the following _outdated_ 00-INDEX files, first
counter is files listed in 00-INDEX but missing in the directory, last
is files present but not listed in 00-INDEX.List of outdated 00-INDEX:
Documentation: (4/10)
Documentation/sysctl: (0/1)
Documentation/timers: (1/0)
Documentation/blockdev: (3/1)
Documentation/w1/slaves: (0/1)
Documentation/locking: (0/1)
Documentation/devicetree: (0/5)
Documentation/power: (1/1)
Documentation/powerpc: (0/5)
Documentation/arm: (1/0)
Documentation/x86: (0/9)
Documentation/x86/x86_64: (1/1)
Documentation/scsi: (4/4)
Documentation/filesystems: (2/9)
Documentation/filesystems/nfs: (0/2)
Documentation/cgroup-v1: (0/2)
Documentation/kbuild: (0/4)
Documentation/spi: (1/0)
Documentation/virtual/kvm: (1/0)
Documentation/scheduler: (0/2)
Documentation/fb: (0/1)
Documentation/block: (0/1)
Documentation/networking: (6/37)
Documentation/vm: (1/3)Then there are 364 subdirectories in Documentation/ with several files that
are missing 00-INDEX alltogether (and another 120 with a single file and no
00-INDEX).I don't really have an opinion to whether or not we /should/ have 00-INDEX,
but the above 00-INDEX should either be removed or be kept up to date. If
we should keep the files, I can try to keep them updated, but I rather not
if we just want to delete them anyway.As a starting point, remove all index-files and references to 00-INDEX and
see where the discussion is going.Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad
Acked-by: "Paul E. McKenney"
Just-do-it-by: Steven Rostedt
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe
Acked-by: Paul Moore
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Acked-by: Mark Brown
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport
Cc: [Almost everybody else]
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet
10 Jul, 2013
1 commit
-
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller
Cc: # 3.10
16 Apr, 2012
1 commit
-
Correct multiple spelling typo in Documentation.
Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida
Acked-by: Rob Landley
Reported-by: Anders Larsen
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina
17 Apr, 2005
1 commit
-
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.Let it rip!
