12 Oct, 2016
4 commits
-
Blocked tasks queued in q_senders waiting for their message to fit in the
queue are blindly awoken every time we think there's a remote chance this
might happen. This could cause numerous (and expensive -- thundering
herd-ish) bogus wakeups if the queue is still really full. Adding to the
scheduling cost/overhead, there's also the fact that we need to take the
ipc object lock and requeue ourselves in the q_senders list.By keeping track of the blocked sender's message size, we can know
previously if the wakeup ought to occur or not. Otherwise, to maintain
the current wakeup order we just move it to the tail. This is exactly
what occurs right now if the sender needs to go back to sleep.The case of EIDRM is left completely untouched, as we need to wakeup all
the tasks, and shouldn't be playing games in the first place.This patch was seen to save on the 'msgctl10' ltp testcase ~15% in context
switches (avg out of ten runs). Although these tests are really about
functionality (as opposed to performance), is does show the direct
benefits of the optimization.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1469748819-19484-6-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Cc: Manfred Spraul
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
... 'tis annoying.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1469748819-19484-4-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Cc: Manfred Spraul
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Currently the use of wake_qs in sysv msg queues are only for the receiver
tasks that are blocked on the queue. But blocked sender tasks (due to
queue size constraints) still are awoken with the ipc object lock held,
which can be a problem particularly for small sized queues and far from
gracious for -rt (just like it was for the receiver side).The paths that actually wakeup a sender are obviously related to when we
are either getting rid of the queue or after (some) space is freed-up
after a receiver takes the msg (msgrcv). Furthermore, with the exception
of msgrcv, we can always piggy-back on expunge_all that has its own tasks
lined-up for waking. Finally, upon unlinking the message, it should be no
problem delaying the wakeups a bit until after we've released the lock.Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1469748819-19484-3-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Cc: Manfred Spraul
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This patch moves the wakeup_process() invocation so it is not done under
the ipc global lock by making use of a lockless wake_q. With this change,
the waiter is woken up once the message has been assigned and it does not
need to loop on SMP if the message points to NULL. In the signal case we
still need to check the pointer under the lock to verify the state.This change should also avoid the introduction of preempt_disable() in -RT
which avoids a busy-loop which pools for the NULL -> !NULL change if the
waiter has a higher priority compared to the waker.By making use of wake_qs, the logic of sysv msg queues is greatly
simplified (and very well suited as we can batch lockless wakeups),
particularly around the lockless receive algorithm.This has been tested with Manred's pmsg-shared tool on a "AMD A10-7800
Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G":test | before | after | diff
-----------------|------------|------------|----------
pmsg-shared 8 60 | 19,347,422 | 30,442,191 | + ~57.34 %
pmsg-shared 4 60 | 21,367,197 | 35,743,458 | + ~67.28 %
pmsg-shared 2 60 | 22,884,224 | 24,278,200 | + ~6.09 %Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1469748819-19484-2-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Cc: Manfred Spraul
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
03 Aug, 2016
1 commit
-
Commit 53dad6d3a8e5 ("ipc: fix race with LSMs") updated ipc_rcu_putref()
to receive rcu freeing function but used generic ipc_rcu_free() instead
of msg_rcu_free() which does security cleaning.Running LTP msgsnd06 with kmemleak gives the following:
cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
unreferenced object 0xffff88003c0a11f8 (size 8):
comm "msgsnd06", pid 1645, jiffies 4294672526 (age 6.549s)
hex dump (first 8 bytes):
1b 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 ........
backtrace:
kmemleak_alloc+0x23/0x40
kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xe1/0x180
selinux_msg_queue_alloc_security+0x3f/0xd0
security_msg_queue_alloc+0x2e/0x40
newque+0x4e/0x150
ipcget+0x159/0x1b0
SyS_msgget+0x39/0x40
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x8fManfred Spraul suggested to fix sem.c as well and Davidlohr Bueso to
only use ipc_rcu_free in case of security allocation failure in newary()Fixes: 53dad6d3a8e ("ipc: fix race with LSMs")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470083552-22966-1-git-send-email-fabf@skynet.be
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Manfred Spraul
Cc: [3.12+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
01 Oct, 2015
1 commit
-
As reported by Dmitry Vyukov, we really shouldn't do ipc_addid() before
having initialized the IPC object state. Yes, we initialize the IPC
object in a locked state, but with all the lockless RCU lookup work,
that IPC object lock no longer means that the state cannot be seen.We already did this for the IPC semaphore code (see commit e8577d1f0329:
"ipc/sem.c: fully initialize sem_array before making it visible") but we
clearly forgot about msg and shm.Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov
Cc: Manfred Spraul
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
01 Jul, 2015
2 commits
-
... to ipc_obtain_object_idr, which is more meaningful and makes the code
slightly easier to follow.Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Manfred Spraul
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
We currently use a full barrier on the sender side to to avoid receiver
tasks disappearing on us while still performing on the sender side wakeup.
We lack however, the proper CPU-CPU interactions pairing on the receiver
side which busy-waits for the message. Similarly, we do not need a full
smp_mb, and can relax the semantics for the writer and reader sides of the
message. This is safe as we are only ordering loads and stores to r_msg.
And in both smp_wmb and smp_rmb, there are no stores after the calls
_anyway_.This obviously applies for pipelined_send and expunge_all, for EIRDM when
destroying a queue.Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Manfred Spraul
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
16 Apr, 2015
1 commit
-
The seq_printf return value, because it's frequently misused,
will eventually be converted to void.See: commit 1f33c41c03da ("seq_file: Rename seq_overflow() to
seq_has_overflowed() and make public")Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
14 Dec, 2014
1 commit
-
SysV can be abused to allocate locked kernel memory. For most systems, a
small limit doesn't make sense, see the discussion with regards to SHMMAX.Therefore: increase MSGMNI to the maximum supported.
And: If we ignore the risk of locking too much memory, then an automatic
scaling of MSGMNI doesn't make sense. Therefore the logic can be removed.The code preserves auto_msgmni to avoid breaking any user space applications
that expect that the value exists.Notes:
1) If an administrator must limit the memory allocations, then he can set
MSGMNI as necessary.Or he can disable sysv entirely (as e.g. done by Android).
2) MSGMAX and MSGMNB are intentionally not increased, as these values are used
to control latency vs. throughput:
If MSGMNB is large, then msgsnd() just returns and more messages can be queued
before a task switch to a task that calls msgrcv() is forced.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Rafael Aquini
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
07 Jun, 2014
6 commits
-
The need for volatile is not obvious, document it.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Nothing big and no logical changes, just get rid of some redundant
function declarations. Move msg_[init/exit]_ns down the end of the
file.Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Call __set_current_state() instead of assigning the new state directly.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
trailing whitespace
Signed-off-by: Paul McQuade
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Use #include instead of
Use #include instead ofSigned-off-by: Paul McQuade
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
There is no need to recreate the very same ipc_ops structure on every
kernel entry for msgget/semget/shmget. Just declare it static and be
done with it. While at it, constify it as we don't modify the structure
at runtime.Found in the PaX patch, written by the PaX Team.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause
Cc: PaX Team
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Manfred Spraul
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
17 Mar, 2014
1 commit
-
While testing and documenting the msgrcv() MSG_COPY flag that Stanislav
Kinsbursky added in commit 4a674f34ba04 ("ipc: introduce message queue
copy feature" => kernel 3.8), I discovered a couple of bugs in the
implementation. The two bugs concern MSG_COPY interactions with other
msgrcv() flags, namely:(A) MSG_COPY + MSG_EXCEPT
(B) MSG_COPY + !IPC_NOWAITThe bugs are distinct (and the fix for the first one is obvious),
however my fix for both is a single-line patch, which is why I'm
combining them in a single mail, rather than writing two mails+patches.===== (A) MSG_COPY + MSG_EXCEPT =====
With the addition of the MSG_COPY flag, there are now two msgrcv()
flags--MSG_COPY and MSG_EXCEPT--that modify the meaning of the 'msgtyp'
argument in unrelated ways. Specifying both in the same call is a
logical error that is currently permitted, with the effect that MSG_COPY
has priority and MSG_EXCEPT is ignored. The call should give an error
if both flags are specified. The patch below implements that behavior.===== (B) (B) MSG_COPY + !IPC_NOWAIT =====
The test code that was submitted in commit 3a665531a3b7 ("selftests: IPC
message queue copy feature test") shows MSG_COPY being used in
conjunction with IPC_NOWAIT. In other words, if there is no message at
the position 'msgtyp'. return immediately with the error in ENOMSG.What was not (fully) tested is the behavior if MSG_COPY is specified
*without* IPC_NOWAIT, and there is an odd behavior. If the queue
contains less than 'msgtyp' messages, then the call blocks until the
next message is written to the queue. At that point, the msgrcv() call
returns a copy of the newly added message, regardless of whether that
message is at the ordinal position 'msgtyp'. This is clearly bogus, and
problematic for applications that might want to make use of the MSG_COPY
flag.I considered the following possible solutions to this problem:
(1) Force the call to block until a message *does* appear at the
position 'msgtyp'.(2) If the MSG_COPY flag is specified, the kernel should implicitly add
IPC_NOWAIT, so that the call fails with ENOMSG for this case.(3) If the MSG_COPY flag is specified, but IPC_NOWAIT is not, generate
an error (probably, EINVAL is the right one).I do not know if any application would really want to have the
functionality of solution (1), especially since an application can
determine in advance the number of messages in the queue using msgctl()
IPC_STAT. Obviously, this solution would be the most work to implement.Solution (2) would have the effect of silently fixing any applications
that tried to employ broken behavior. However, it would mean that if we
later decided to implement solution (1), then user-space could not
easily detect what the kernel supports (but, since I'm somewhat doubtful
that solution (1) is needed, I'm not sure that this is much of a
problem).Solution (3) would have the effect of informing broken applications that
they are doing something broken. The downside is that this would cause
a ABI breakage for any applications that are currently employing the
broken behavior. However:a) Those applications are almost certainly not getting the results they
expect.
b) Possibly, those applications don't even exist, because MSG_COPY is
currently hidden behind CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE.The upside of solution (3) is that if we later decided to implement
solution (1), user-space could determine what the kernel supports, via
the error return.In my view, solution (3) is mildly preferable to solution (2), and
solution (1) could still be done later if anyone really cares. The
patch below implements solution (3).PS. For anyone out there still listening, it's the usual story:
documenting an API (and the thinking about, and the testing of the API,
that documentation entails) is the one of the single best ways of
finding bugs in the API, as I've learned from a lot of experience. Best
to do that documentation before releasing the API.Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk
Acked-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky
Cc: Stanislav Kinsbursky
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Serge Hallyn
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman"
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov
Cc: Al Viro
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
28 Jan, 2014
3 commits
-
Both expunge_all() and pipeline_send() rely on both a nil msg value and
a full barrier to guarantee the correct ordering when waking up a task.While its counterpart at the receiving end is well documented for the
lockless recv algorithm, we still need to document these specific
smp_mb() calls.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo, per Mike]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: mroe tpyos]
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Manfred Spraul
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
The ipc code does not adhere the typical linux coding style.
This patch fixes lots of simple whitespace errors.- mostly autogenerated by
scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --fix \
--types=pointer_location,spacing,space_before_tab
- one manual fixup (keep structure members tab-aligned)
- removal of additional space_before_tab that were not found by --fixTested with some of my msg and sem test apps.
Andrew: Could you include it in -mm and move it towards Linus' tree?
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul
Suggested-by: Li Bin
Cc: Joe Perches
Acked-by: Rafael Aquini
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
After the locking semantics for the SysV IPC API got improved, a couple
of IPC_RMID race windows were opened because we ended up dropping the
'kern_ipc_perm.deleted' check performed way down in ipc_lock(). The
spotted races got sorted out by re-introducing the old test within the
racy critical sections.This patch introduces ipc_valid_object() to consolidate the way we cope
with IPC_RMID races by using the same abstraction across the API
implementation.Signed-off-by: Rafael Aquini
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Acked-by: Greg Thelen
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Manfred Spraul
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
01 Oct, 2013
1 commit
-
This fixes a race in both msgrcv() and msgsnd() between finding the msg
and actually dealing with the queue, as another thread can delete shmid
underneath us if we are preempted before acquiring the
kern_ipc_perm.lock.Manfred illustrates this nicely:
Assume a preemptible kernel that is preempted just after
msq = msq_obtain_object_check(ns, msqid)
in do_msgrcv(). The only lock that is held is rcu_read_lock().
Now the other thread processes IPC_RMID. When the first task is
resumed, then it will happily wait for messages on a deleted queue.Fix this by checking for if the queue has been deleted after taking the
lock.Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Reported-by: Manfred Spraul
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Mike Galbraith
Cc: [3.11]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
25 Sep, 2013
1 commit
-
Currently, IPC mechanisms do security and auditing related checks under
RCU. However, since security modules can free the security structure,
for example, through selinux_[sem,msg_queue,shm]_free_security(), we can
race if the structure is freed before other tasks are done with it,
creating a use-after-free condition. Manfred illustrates this nicely,
for instance with shared mem and selinux:-> do_shmat calls rcu_read_lock()
-> do_shmat calls shm_object_check().
Checks that the object is still valid - but doesn't acquire any locks.
Then it returns.
-> do_shmat calls security_shm_shmat (e.g. selinux_shm_shmat)
-> selinux_shm_shmat calls ipc_has_perm()
-> ipc_has_perm accesses ipc_perms->securityshm_close()
-> shm_close acquires rw_mutex & shm_lock
-> shm_close calls shm_destroy
-> shm_destroy calls security_shm_free (e.g. selinux_shm_free_security)
-> selinux_shm_free_security calls ipc_free_security(&shp->shm_perm)
-> ipc_free_security calls kfree(ipc_perms->security)This patch delays the freeing of the security structures after all RCU
readers are done. Furthermore it aligns the security life cycle with
that of the rest of IPC - freeing them based on the reference counter.
For situations where we need not free security, the current behavior is
kept. Linus states:"... the old behavior was suspect for another reason too: having the
security blob go away from under a user sounds like it could cause
various other problems anyway, so I think the old code was at least
_prone_ to bugs even if it didn't have catastrophic behavior."I have tested this patch with IPC testcases from LTP on both my
quad-core laptop and on a 64 core NUMA server. In both cases selinux is
enabled, and tests pass for both voluntary and forced preemption models.
While the mentioned races are theoretical (at least no one as reported
them), I wanted to make sure that this new logic doesn't break anything
we weren't aware of.Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Acked-by: Manfred Spraul
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
12 Sep, 2013
2 commits
-
There is only one user left, drop this function and just call
ipc_unlock_object() and rcu_read_unlock().Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Manfred Spraul
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Since in some situations the lock can be shared for readers, we shouldn't
be calling it a mutex, rename it to rwsem.Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek
Cc: Rik van Riel
Cc: Manfred Spraul
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
04 Sep, 2013
1 commit
-
The check if the queue is full and adding current to the wait queue of
pending msgsnd() operations (ss_add()) must be atomic.Otherwise:
- the thread that performs msgsnd() finds a full queue and decides to
sleep.
- the thread that performs msgrcv() first reads all messages from the
queue and then sleeps, because the queue is empty.
- the msgrcv() calls do not perform any wakeups, because the msgsnd()
task has not yet called ss_add().
- then the msgsnd()-thread first calls ss_add() and then sleeps.Net result: msgsnd() and msgrcv() both sleep forever.
Observed with msgctl08 from ltp with a preemptible kernel.
Fix: Call ipc_lock_object() before performing the check.
The patch also moves security_msg_queue_msgsnd() under ipc_lock_object:
- msgctl(IPC_SET) explicitely mentions that it tries to expunge any
pending operations that are not allowed anymore with the new
permissions. If security_msg_queue_msgsnd() is called without locks,
then there might be races.
- it makes the patch much simpler.Reported-and-tested-by: Vineet Gupta
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # for 3.11
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
29 Aug, 2013
1 commit
-
According to 'man msgrcv': "If msgtyp is less than 0, the first message of
the lowest type that is less than or equal to the absolute value of msgtyp
shall be received."Bug: The kernel only returns a message if its type is 1; other messages
with type < abs(msgtype) will never get returned.Fix: After having traversed the list to find the first message with the
lowest type, we need to actually return that message.This regression was introduced by commit daaf74cf0867 ("ipc: refactor
msg list search into separate function")Signed-off-by: Svenning Soerensen
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
10 Jul, 2013
10 commits
-
We can now drop the msg_lock and msg_lock_check functions along with a
bogus comment introduced previously in semctl_down.Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
do_msgrcv() is the last msg queue function that abuses the ipc lock Take
it only when needed when actually updating msq.Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Rik van Riel
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
do_msgsnd() is another function that does too many things with the ipc
object lock acquired. Take it only when needed when actually updating
msq.Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
While the INFO cmd doesn't take the ipc lock, the STAT commands do
acquire it unnecessarily. We can do the permissions and security checks
only holding the rcu lock.This function now mimics semctl_nolock().
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Add msq_obtain_object() and msq_obtain_object_check(), which will allow
us to get the ipc object without acquiring the lock. Just as with
semaphores, these functions are basically wrappers around
ipc_obtain_object*().Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Similar to semctl, when calling msgctl, the *_INFO and *_STAT commands
can be performed without acquiring the ipc object.Add a msgctl_nolock() function and move the logic of *_INFO and *_STAT
out of msgctl(). This change still takes the lock and it will be
properly lockless in the next patchSigned-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Instead of holding the ipc lock for the entire function, use the
ipcctl_pre_down_nolock and only acquire the lock for specific commands:
RMID and SET.Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This function currently acquires both the rw_mutex and the rcu lock on
successful lookups, leaving the callers to explicitly unlock them,
creating another two level locking situation.Make the callers (including those that still use ipcctl_pre_down())
explicitly lock and unlock the rwsem and rcu lock.Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This patchset continues the work that began in the sysv ipc semaphore
scaling series, seehttps://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/20/546
Just like semaphores used to be, sysv shared memory and msg queues also
abuse the ipc lock, unnecessarily holding it for operations such as
permission and security checks.This patchset mostly deals with mqueues, and while shared mem can be
done in a very similar way, I want to get these patches out in the open
first. It also does some pending cleanups, mostly focused on the two
level locking we have in ipc code, taking care of ipc_addid() and
ipcctl_pre_down_nolock() - yes there are still functions that need to be
updated as well.This patch:
Make all callers explicitly take and release the RCU read lock.
This addresses the two level locking seen in newary(), newseg() and
newqueue(). For the last two, explicitly unlock the ipc object and the
rcu lock, instead of calling the custom shm_unlock and msg_unlock
functions. The next patch will deal with the open coded locking for
->perm.lockSigned-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Rik van Riel
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
01 May, 2013
4 commits
-
The ipc/msg.c code does its list operations by hand and it open-codes the
accesses, instead of using for_each_entry_[safe].Signed-off-by: Nikola Pajkovsky
Cc: Stanislav Kinsbursky
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman"
Cc: Peter Hurley
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Introduce finer grained locking for semtimedop, to handle the common case
of a program wanting to manipulate one semaphore from an array with
multiple semaphores.If the call is a semop manipulating just one semaphore in an array with
multiple semaphores, only take the lock for that semaphore itself.If the call needs to manipulate multiple semaphores, or another caller is
in a transaction that manipulates multiple semaphores, the sem_array lock
is taken, as well as all the locks for the individual semaphores.On a 24 CPU system, performance numbers with the semop-multi
test with N threads and N semaphores, look like this:vanilla Davidlohr's Davidlohr's + Davidlohr's +
threads patches rwlock patches v3 patches
10 610652 726325 1783589 2142206
20 341570 365699 1520453 1977878
30 288102 307037 1498167 2037995
40 290714 305955 1612665 2256484
50 288620 312890 1733453 2650292
60 289987 306043 1649360 2388008
70 291298 306347 1723167 2717486
80 290948 305662 1729545 2763582
90 290996 306680 1736021 2757524
100 292243 306700 1773700 3059159[davidlohr.bueso@hp.com: do not call sem_lock when bogus sma]
[davidlohr.bueso@hp.com: make refcounter atomic]
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: Chegu Vinod
Cc: Jason Low
Reviewed-by: Michel Lespinasse
Cc: Peter Hurley
Cc: Stanislav Kinsbursky
Tested-by: Emmanuel Benisty
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
[fengguang.wu@intel.com: find_msg can be static]
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley
Cc: Fengguang Wu
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley
Acked-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
