02 Nov, 2017

1 commit

  • Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
    makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

    By default all files without license information are under the default
    license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

    Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
    SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
    shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

    This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
    Philippe Ombredanne.

    How this work was done:

    Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
    the use cases:
    - file had no licensing information it it.
    - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
    - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

    Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
    where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
    had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

    The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
    a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
    output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
    tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
    base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

    The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
    assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
    results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
    to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
    immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

    Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
    - Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
    - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
    lines of source
    - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if
    Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne
    Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner
    Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

    Greg Kroah-Hartman
     

31 Mar, 2011

1 commit


13 Mar, 2009

1 commit


13 Oct, 2007

1 commit


10 Feb, 2007

1 commit


01 Jul, 2006

1 commit


07 Mar, 2006

1 commit

  • On 02/07/2006 04:12:55 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 08:02:21PM -0500, Willem Riede wrote:
    >
    > > But I will certainly help retire scsi_request. And anything else that is
    > > needed to keep up with proper kernel style. Let me know what those are, if
    > > you would? I'll start looking at how st has changed, and will be back with
    > > any questions I may have.
    >
    > right now the above is the most urgent bit. What would be nice but not
    > required is a conversion to the sense handling helpers, similar to what
    > st got (aka using the *normalize_sense functions and then dealing with the
    > parsed sense buffer instead of the raw sense data)

    Ok, so here is my first take at satisfying this request.
    Be warned, that beyond compiling, and checking that the new module
    doesn't immediately blow up, there hasn't yet been a lot of testing.

    But this should allow you to comment on the changes, and move forward
    with dropping scsi_request from the kernel code.

    Signed-off-by: Willem Riede
    Signed-off-by: James Bottomley

    Willem Riede
     

17 Apr, 2005

1 commit

  • Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
    even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
    archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
    3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
    git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
    infrastructure for it.

    Let it rip!

    Linus Torvalds