Commit 521c42990e9d561ed5ed9f501f07639d0512b3c9
Committed by
Thomas Gleixner
1 parent
55101e2d6c
Exists in
master
and in
13 other branches
tick-common: Fix wrong check in tick_check_replacement()
tick_check_replacement() returns if a replacement of clock_event_device is possible or not. It does this as the first check: if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id())) return false; Thats wrong. tick_check_percpu() returns true when the device is useable. Check for false instead. [ tglx: Massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.11+ Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com Cc: Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com Cc: linaro-networking@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/486a02efe0246635aaba786e24b42d316438bf3b.1397537987.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Showing 1 changed file with 1 additions and 1 deletions Side-by-side Diff
kernel/time/tick-common.c
... | ... | @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ |
276 | 276 | bool tick_check_replacement(struct clock_event_device *curdev, |
277 | 277 | struct clock_event_device *newdev) |
278 | 278 | { |
279 | - if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id())) | |
279 | + if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id())) | |
280 | 280 | return false; |
281 | 281 | |
282 | 282 | return tick_check_preferred(curdev, newdev); |