Commit 9ec84acee1e221d99dc33237bff5e82839d10cc0

Authored by Ben Hutchings
Committed by Ingo Molnar
1 parent 81140acc66

lockdep, bug: Exclude TAINT_OOT_MODULE from disabling lock debugging

We do want to allow lock debugging for GPL-compatible modules
that are not (yet) built in-tree.  This was disabled as a
side-effect of commit 2449b8ba0745327c5fa49a8d9acffe03b2eded69
('module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built
in-tree').  Lock debug warnings now include taint flags, so
kernel developers should still be able to deflect warnings
caused by out-of-tree modules.

The TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE flag for non-GPL-compatible modules
will still disable lock debugging.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1323268258.18450.11.camel@deadeye
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 2 deletions Side-by-side Diff

... ... @@ -237,11 +237,12 @@
237 237 * Can't trust the integrity of the kernel anymore.
238 238 * We don't call directly debug_locks_off() because the issue
239 239 * is not necessarily serious enough to set oops_in_progress to 1
240   - * Also we want to keep up lockdep for staging development and
241   - * post-warning case.
  240 + * Also we want to keep up lockdep for staging/out-of-tree
  241 + * development and post-warning case.
242 242 */
243 243 switch (flag) {
244 244 case TAINT_CRAP:
  245 + case TAINT_OOT_MODULE:
245 246 case TAINT_WARN:
246 247 case TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND:
247 248 break;