Commit b3eaa9fc5cd0a4d74b18f6b8dc617aeaf1873270

Authored by Thomas Gleixner
Committed by Linus Torvalds
1 parent e9c243a5a6

futex: Validate atomic acquisition in futex_lock_pi_atomic()

We need to protect the atomic acquisition in the kernel against rogue
user space which sets the user space futex to 0, so the kernel side
acquisition succeeds while there is existing state in the kernel
associated to the real owner.

Verify whether the futex has waiters associated with kernel state.  If
it has, return -EINVAL.  The state is corrupted already, so no point in
cleaning it up.  Subsequent calls will fail as well.  Not our problem.

[ tglx: Use futex_top_waiter() and explain why we do not need to try
  	restoring the already corrupted user space state. ]

Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Showing 1 changed file with 11 additions and 3 deletions Side-by-side Diff

... ... @@ -910,10 +910,18 @@
910 910 return -EDEADLK;
911 911  
912 912 /*
913   - * Surprise - we got the lock. Just return to userspace:
  913 + * Surprise - we got the lock, but we do not trust user space at all.
914 914 */
915   - if (unlikely(!curval))
916   - return 1;
  915 + if (unlikely(!curval)) {
  916 + /*
  917 + * We verify whether there is kernel state for this
  918 + * futex. If not, we can safely assume, that the 0 ->
  919 + * TID transition is correct. If state exists, we do
  920 + * not bother to fixup the user space state as it was
  921 + * corrupted already.
  922 + */
  923 + return futex_top_waiter(hb, key) ? -EINVAL : 1;
  924 + }
917 925  
918 926 uval = curval;
919 927