02 Apr, 2014
1 commit
-
The current mainline has copies propagated to *all* nodes, then
tears down the copies we made for nodes that do not contain
counterparts of the desired mountpoint. That sets the right
propagation graph for the copies (at teardown time we move
the slaves of removed node to a surviving peer or directly
to master), but we end up paying a fairly steep price in
useless allocations. It's fairly easy to create a situation
where N calls of mount(2) create exactly N bindings, with
O(N^2) vfsmounts allocated and freed in process.Fortunately, it is possible to avoid those allocations/freeings.
The trick is to create copies in the right order and find which
one would've eventually become a master with the current algorithm.
It turns out to be possible in O(nodes getting propagation) time
and with no extra allocations at all.One part is that we need to make sure that eventual master will be
created before its slaves, so we need to walk the propagation
tree in a different order - by peer groups. And iterate through
the peers before dealing with the next group.Another thing is finding the (earlier) copy that will be a master
of one we are about to create; to do that we are (temporary) marking
the masters of mountpoints we are attaching the copies to.Either we are in a peer of the last mountpoint we'd dealt with,
or we have the following situation: we are attaching to mountpoint M,
the last copy S_0 had been attached to M_0 and there are sequences
S_0...S_n, M_0...M_n such that S_{i+1} is a master of S_{i},
S_{i} mounted on M{i} and we need to create a slave of the first S_{k}
such that M is getting propagation from M_{k}. It means that the master
of M_{k} will be among the sequence of masters of M. On the
other hand, the nearest marked node in that sequence will either
be the master of M_{k} or the master of M_{k-1} (the latter -
in the case if M_{k-1} is a slave of something M gets propagation
from, but in a wrong peer group).So we go through the sequence of masters of M until we find
a marked one (P). Let N be the one before it. Then we go through
the sequence of masters of S_0 until we find one (say, S) mounted
on a node D that has P as master and check if D is a peer of N.
If it is, S will be the master of new copy, if not - the master of S
will be.That's it for the hard part; the rest is fairly simple. Iterator
is in next_group(), handling of one prospective mountpoint is
propagate_one().It seems to survive all tests and gives a noticably better performance
than the current mainline for setups that are seriously using shared
subtrees.Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
31 Mar, 2014
1 commit
-
fixes RCU bug - walking through hlist is safe in face of element moves,
since it's self-terminating. Cyclic lists are not - if we end up jumping
to another hash chain, we'll loop infinitely without ever hitting the
original list head.[fix for dumb braino folded]
Spotted by: Max Kellermann
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
25 Oct, 2013
3 commits
-
Instead of passing the direction as argument (and checking it on every
step through the hash chain), just have separate __lookup_mnt() and
__lookup_mnt_last(). And use the standard iterators...Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
aka br_write_{lock,unlock} of vfsmount_lock. Inlines in fs/mount.h,
vfsmount_lock extern moved over there as well.Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
01 Jun, 2013
1 commit
-
When the group id of a shared mount is not allocated, the umount still
tries to call mnt_release_group_id(), which eventually hits a kernel
warning at ida_remove() spewing a message like:
ida_remove called for id=0 which is not allocated.This patch fixes the bug simply checking the group id in the caller.
Reported-by: Cristian Rodríguez
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
02 May, 2013
1 commit
-
Pull VFS updates from Al Viro,
Misc cleanups all over the place, mainly wrt /proc interfaces (switch
create_proc_entry to proc_create(), get rid of the deprecated
create_proc_read_entry() in favor of using proc_create_data() and
seq_file etc).7kloc removed.
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: (204 commits)
don't bother with deferred freeing of fdtables
proc: Move non-public stuff from linux/proc_fs.h to fs/proc/internal.h
proc: Make the PROC_I() and PDE() macros internal to procfs
proc: Supply a function to remove a proc entry by PDE
take cgroup_open() and cpuset_open() to fs/proc/base.c
ppc: Clean up scanlog
ppc: Clean up rtas_flash driver somewhat
hostap: proc: Use remove_proc_subtree()
drm: proc: Use remove_proc_subtree()
drm: proc: Use minor->index to label things, not PDE->name
drm: Constify drm_proc_list[]
zoran: Don't print proc_dir_entry data in debug
reiserfs: Don't access the proc_dir_entry in r_open(), r_start() r_show()
proc: Supply an accessor for getting the data from a PDE's parent
airo: Use remove_proc_subtree()
rtl8192u: Don't need to save device proc dir PDE
rtl8187se: Use a dir under /proc/net/r8180/
proc: Add proc_mkdir_data()
proc: Move some bits from linux/proc_fs.h to linux/{of.h,signal.h,tty.h}
proc: Move PDE_NET() to fs/proc/proc_net.c
...
10 Apr, 2013
2 commits
-
which allows to kill the last argument of umount_tree() and make release_mounts()
static.Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
27 Mar, 2013
1 commit
-
As a matter of policy MNT_READONLY should not be changable if the
original mounter had more privileges than creator of the mount
namespace.Add the flag CL_UNPRIVILEGED to note when we are copying a mount from
a mount namespace that requires more privileges to a mount namespace
that requires fewer privileges.When the CL_UNPRIVILEGED flag is set cause clone_mnt to set MNT_NO_REMOUNT
if any of the mnt flags that should never be changed are set.This protects both mount propagation and the initial creation of a less
privileged mount namespace.Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn
Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"
14 Jul, 2012
1 commit
-
copy_tree() can theoretically fail in a case other than ENOMEM, but always
returns NULL which is interpreted by callers as -ENOMEM. Change it to return
an explicit error.Also change clone_mnt() for consistency and because union mounts will add new
error cases.Thanks to Andreas Gruenbacher for a bug fix.
[AV: folded braino fix by Dan Carpenter]Original-author: Valerie Aurora
Signed-off-by: David Howells
Cc: Valerie Aurora
Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
30 May, 2012
1 commit
-
lglocks and brlocks are currently generated with some complicated macros
in lglock.h. But there's no reason to not just use common utility
functions and put all the data into a common data structure.In preparation, this patch changes the API to look more like normal
function calls with pointers, not magic macros.The patch is rather large because I move over all users in one go to keep
it bisectable. This impacts the VFS somewhat in terms of lines changed.
But no actual behaviour change.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes]
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen
Cc: Al Viro
Cc: Rusty Russell
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
04 Jan, 2012
28 commits
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
make IS_MNT_SLAVE take struct mount * at the same time
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
next pile of horrors, similar to mnt_parent one; this time it's
mnt_master.Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
the second victim...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
taken out of struct vfsmount into struct mount
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
switch __lookup_mnt() to returning struct mount *; callers adjusted.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
-
a) mount --move is checking that ->mnt_parent is non-NULL before
looking if that parent happens to be shared; ->mnt_parent is never
NULL and it's not even an misspelled !mnt_has_parent()b) pivot_root open-codes is_path_reachable(), poorly.
c) so does path_is_under(), while we are at it.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro