Eric Lee / smarc-ti-linux-kernel

20 Dec, 2014

1 commit

01 May, 2013

1 commit

  • 196779b9b   dump_stack: consolidate dump_stack() implementations and unify their behaviors ... Browse Code »

    Both dump_stack() and show_stack() are currently implemented by each
    architecture. show_stack(NULL, NULL) dumps the backtrace for the
    current task as does dump_stack(). On some archs, dump_stack() prints
    extra information - pid, utsname and so on - in addition to the
    backtrace while the two are identical on other archs.

    The usages in arch-independent code of the two functions indicate
    show_stack(NULL, NULL) should print out bare backtrace while
    dump_stack() is used for debugging purposes when something went wrong,
    so it does make sense to print additional information on the task which
    triggered dump_stack().

    There's no reason to require archs to implement two separate but mostly
    identical functions. It leads to unnecessary subtle information.

    This patch expands the dummy fallback dump_stack() implementation in
    lib/dump_stack.c such that it prints out debug information (taken from
    x86) and invokes show_stack(NULL, NULL) and drops arch-specific
    dump_stack() implementations in all archs except blackfin. Blackfin's
    dump_stack() does something wonky that I don't understand.

    Debug information can be printed separately by calling
    dump_stack_print_info() so that arch-specific dump_stack()
    implementation can still emit the same debug information. This is used
    in blackfin.

    This patch brings the following behavior changes.

    * On some archs, an extra level in backtrace for show_stack() could be
    printed. This is because the top frame was determined in
    dump_stack() on those archs while generic dump_stack() can't do that
    reliably. It can be compensated by inlining dump_stack() but not
    sure whether that'd be necessary.

    * Most archs didn't use to print debug info on dump_stack(). They do
    now.

    An example WARN dump follows.

    WARNING: at kernel/workqueue.c:4841 init_workqueues+0x35/0x505()
    Hardware name: empty
    Modules linked in:
    CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.9.0-rc1-work+ #9
    0000000000000009 ffff88007c861e08 ffffffff81c614dc ffff88007c861e48
    ffffffff8108f50f ffffffff82228240 0000000000000040 ffffffff8234a03c
    0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff88007c861e58
    Call Trace:
    [] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
    [] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
    [] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
    [] init_workqueues+0x35/0x505
    ...

    v2: CPU number added to the generic debug info as requested by s390
    folks and dropped the s390 specific dump_stack(). This loses %ksp
    from the debug message which the maintainers think isn't important
    enough to keep the s390-specific dump_stack() implementation.

    dump_stack_print_info() is moved to kernel/printk.c from
    lib/dump_stack.c. Because linkage is per objecct file,
    dump_stack_print_info() living in the same lib file as generic
    dump_stack() means that archs which implement custom dump_stack()
    - at this point, only blackfin - can't use dump_stack_print_info()
    as that will bring in the generic version of dump_stack() too. v1
    The v1 patch broke build on blackfin due to this issue. The build
    breakage was reported by Fengguang Wu.

    Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo
    Acked-by: David S. Miller
    Acked-by: Vineet Gupta
    Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson
    Acked-by: Vineet Gupta
    Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky [s390 bits]
    Cc: Heiko Carstens
    Cc: Mike Frysinger
    Cc: Fengguang Wu
    Cc: Bjorn Helgaas
    Cc: Sam Ravnborg
    Acked-by: Richard Kuo [hexagon bits]
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

    Tejun Heo
     

29 Mar, 2012

1 commit

31 Mar, 2011

1 commit

08 Feb, 2008

1 commit

28 Jul, 2005

1 commit

17 Apr, 2005

1 commit

  • 1da177e4c   Linux-2.6.12-rc2 ... Browse Code »
    212

    Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
    even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
    archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
    3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
    git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
    infrastructure for it.

    Let it rip!

    Linus Torvalds