Commit 4eb2b1dcd598f8489130405c81c60c289896d92a

Authored by Mel Gorman
Committed by Linus Torvalds
1 parent 70da2340fb

hugetlb: acquire the i_mmap_lock before walking the prio_tree to unmap a page

When the owner of a mapping fails COW because a child process is holding a
reference, the children VMAs are walked and the page is unmapped.  The
i_mmap_lock is taken for the unmapping of the page but not the walking of
the prio_tree.  In theory, that tree could be changing if the lock is not
held.  This patch takes the i_mmap_lock properly for the duration of the
prio_tree walk.

[hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk: Spotted the problem in the first place]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Showing 1 changed file with 8 additions and 1 deletions Side-by-side Diff

... ... @@ -2237,6 +2237,12 @@
2237 2237 + (vma->vm_pgoff >> PAGE_SHIFT);
2238 2238 mapping = (struct address_space *)page_private(page);
2239 2239  
  2240 + /*
  2241 + * Take the mapping lock for the duration of the table walk. As
  2242 + * this mapping should be shared between all the VMAs,
  2243 + * __unmap_hugepage_range() is called as the lock is already held
  2244 + */
  2245 + spin_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock);
2240 2246 vma_prio_tree_foreach(iter_vma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) {
2241 2247 /* Do not unmap the current VMA */
2242 2248 if (iter_vma == vma)
2243 2249  
... ... @@ -2250,10 +2256,11 @@
2250 2256 * from the time of fork. This would look like data corruption
2251 2257 */
2252 2258 if (!is_vma_resv_set(iter_vma, HPAGE_RESV_OWNER))
2253   - unmap_hugepage_range(iter_vma,
  2259 + __unmap_hugepage_range(iter_vma,
2254 2260 address, address + huge_page_size(h),
2255 2261 page);
2256 2262 }
  2263 + spin_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock);
2257 2264  
2258 2265 return 1;
2259 2266 }