14 Oct, 2020
1 commit
-
Since commit bbec2e15170a ("mm: rename page_counter's count/limit into
usage/max"), page_counter_limit() is renamed to page_counter_set_max().
So replace page_counter_limit with page_counter_set_max in comment.Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Cc: Roman Gushchin
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200917113629.14382-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
15 Aug, 2020
1 commit
-
Commit 3e32cb2e0a12 ("mm: memcontrol: lockless page counters") could had
memcg->memsw->watermark and memcg->memsw->failcnt been accessed
concurrently as reported by KCSAN,BUG: KCSAN: data-race in page_counter_try_charge / page_counter_try_charge
read to 0xffff8fb18c4cd190 of 8 bytes by task 1081 on cpu 59:
page_counter_try_charge+0x4d/0x150 mm/page_counter.c:138
try_charge+0x131/0xd50 mm/memcontrol.c:2405
__memcg_kmem_charge_memcg+0x58/0x140
__memcg_kmem_charge+0xcc/0x280
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1e1/0x450
alloc_pages_current+0xa6/0x120
pte_alloc_one+0x17/0xd0
__pte_alloc+0x3a/0x1f0
copy_p4d_range+0xc36/0x1990
copy_page_range+0x21d/0x360
dup_mmap+0x5f5/0x7a0
dup_mm+0xa2/0x240
copy_process+0x1b3f/0x3460
_do_fork+0xaa/0xa20
__x64_sys_clone+0x13b/0x170
do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb47
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbewrite to 0xffff8fb18c4cd190 of 8 bytes by task 1153 on cpu 120:
page_counter_try_charge+0x5b/0x150 mm/page_counter.c:139
try_charge+0x131/0xd50 mm/memcontrol.c:2405
mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x159/0x460
mem_cgroup_try_charge_delay+0x3d/0xa0
wp_page_copy+0x14d/0x930
do_wp_page+0x107/0x7b0
__handle_mm_fault+0xce6/0xd40
handle_mm_fault+0xfc/0x2f0
do_page_fault+0x263/0x6f9
page_fault+0x34/0x40BUG: KCSAN: data-race in page_counter_try_charge / page_counter_try_charge
write to 0xffff88809bbf2158 of 8 bytes by task 11782 on cpu 0:
page_counter_try_charge+0x100/0x170 mm/page_counter.c:129
try_charge+0x185/0xbf0 mm/memcontrol.c:2405
__memcg_kmem_charge_memcg+0x4a/0xe0 mm/memcontrol.c:2837
__memcg_kmem_charge+0xcf/0x1b0 mm/memcontrol.c:2877
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x26c/0x310 mm/page_alloc.c:4780read to 0xffff88809bbf2158 of 8 bytes by task 11814 on cpu 1:
page_counter_try_charge+0xef/0x170 mm/page_counter.c:129
try_charge+0x185/0xbf0 mm/memcontrol.c:2405
__memcg_kmem_charge_memcg+0x4a/0xe0 mm/memcontrol.c:2837
__memcg_kmem_charge+0xcf/0x1b0 mm/memcontrol.c:2877
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x26c/0x310 mm/page_alloc.c:4780Since watermark could be compared or set to garbage due to a data race
which would change the code logic, fix it by adding a pair of READ_ONCE()
and WRITE_ONCE() in those places.The "failcnt" counter is tolerant of some degree of inaccuracy and is only
used to report stats, a data race will not be harmful, thus mark it as an
intentional data race using the data_race() macro.Fixes: 3e32cb2e0a12 ("mm: memcontrol: lockless page counters")
Reported-by: syzbot+f36cfe60b1006a94f9dc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: David Hildenbrand
Cc: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Marco Elver
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1581519682-23594-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
08 Aug, 2020
1 commit
-
When workload runs in cgroups that aren't directly below root cgroup and
their parent specifies reclaim protection, it may end up ineffective.The reason is that propagate_protected_usage() is not called in all
hierarchy up. All the protected usage is incorrectly accumulated in the
workload's parent. This means that siblings_low_usage is overestimated
and effective protection underestimated. Even though it is transitional
phenomenon (uncharge path does correct propagation and fixes the wrong
children_low_usage), it can undermine the intended protection
unexpectedly.We have noticed this problem while seeing a swap out in a descendant of a
protected memcg (intermediate node) while the parent was conveniently
under its protection limit and the memory pressure was external to that
hierarchy. Michal has pinpointed this down to the wrong
siblings_low_usage which led to the unwanted reclaim.The fix is simply updating children_low_usage in respective ancestors also
in the charging path.Fixes: 230671533d64 ("mm: memory.low hierarchical behavior")
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Tejun Heo
Cc: [4.18+]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200803153231.15477-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
03 Apr, 2020
3 commits
-
This can be set concurrently with reads, which may cause the wrong value
to be propagated.Signed-off-by: Chris Down
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Roman Gushchin
Cc: Tejun Heo
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e809b4e6b0c1626dac6945970de06409a180ee65.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.name
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This can be set concurrently with reads, which may cause the wrong value
to be propagated.Signed-off-by: Chris Down
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Roman Gushchin
Cc: Tejun Heo
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/448206f44b0fa7be9dad2ca2601d2bcb2c0b7844.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.name
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Patch series "mm: memcontrol: recursive memory.low protection", v3.
The current memory.low (and memory.min) semantics require protection to be
assigned to a cgroup in an untinterrupted chain from the top-level cgroup
all the way to the leaf.In practice, we want to protect entire cgroup subtrees from each other
(system management software vs. workload), but we would like the VM to
balance memory optimally *within* each subtree, without having to make
explicit weight allocations among individual components. The current
semantics make that impossible.They also introduce unmanageable complexity into more advanced resource
trees. For example:host root
`- system.slice
`- rpm upgrades
`- logging
`- workload.slice
`- a container
`- system.slice
`- workload.slice
`- job A
`- component 1
`- component 2
`- job BAt a host-level perspective, we would like to protect the outer
workload.slice subtree as a whole from rpm upgrades, logging etc. But for
that to be effective, right now we'd have to propagate it down through the
container, the inner workload.slice, into the job cgroup and ultimately
the component cgroups where memory is actually, physically allocated.
This may cross several tree delegation points and namespace boundaries,
which make such a setup near impossible.CPU and IO on the other hand are already distributed recursively. The
user would simply configure allowances at the host level, and they would
apply to the entire subtree without any downward propagation.To enable the above-mentioned usecases and bring memory in line with other
resource controllers, this patch series extends memory.low/min such that
settings apply recursively to the entire subtree. Users can still assign
explicit shares in subgroups, but if they don't, any ancestral protection
will be distributed such that children compete freely amongst each other -
as if no memory control were enabled inside the subtree - but enjoy
protection from neighboring trees.In the above example, the user would then be able to configure shares of
CPU, IO and memory at the host level to comprehensively protect and
isolate the workload.slice as a whole from system.slice activity.Patch #1 fixes an existing bug that can give a cgroup tree more protection
than it should receive as per ancestor configuration.Patch #2 simplifies and documents the existing code to make it easier to
reason about the changes in the next patch.Patch #3 finally implements recursive memory protection semantics.
Because of a risk of regressing legacy setups, the new semantics are
hidden behind a cgroup2 mount option, 'memory_recursiveprot'.More details in patch #3.
This patch (of 3):
When memory.low is overcommitted - i.e. the children claim more
protection than their shared ancestor grants them - the allowance is
distributed in proportion to how much each sibling uses their own declared
protection:low_usage = min(memory.low, memory.current)
elow = parent_elow * (low_usage / siblings_low_usage)However, siblings_low_usage is not the sum of all low_usages. It sums
up the usages of *only those cgroups that are within their memory.low*
That means that low_usage can be *bigger* than siblings_low_usage, and
consequently the total protection afforded to the children can be
bigger than what the ancestor grants the subtree.Consider three groups where two are in excess of their protection:
A/memory.low = 10G
A/A1/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G
A/A2/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G
A/A3/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 8G
siblings_low_usage = 8G (only A3 contributes)A1/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(8G) = 12.5G -> 10G
A2/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(8G) = 12.5G -> 10G
A3/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(8G) / siblings_low_usage(8G) = 10.0G(the 12.5G are capped to the explicit memory.low setting of 10G)
With that, the sum of all awarded protection below A is 30G, when A
only grants 10G for the entire subtree.What does this mean in practice? A1 and A2 would still be in excess of
their 10G allowance and would be reclaimed, whereas A3 would not. As
they eventually drop below their protection setting, they would be
counted in siblings_low_usage again and the error would right itself.When reclaim was applied in a binary fashion (cgroup is reclaimed when
it's above its protection, otherwise it's skipped) this would actually
work out just fine. However, since 1bc63fb1272b ("mm, memcg: make scan
aggression always exclude protection"), reclaim pressure is scaled to
how much a cgroup is above its protection. As a result this
calculation error unduly skews pressure away from A1 and A2 toward the
rest of the system.But why did we do it like this in the first place?
The reasoning behind exempting groups in excess from
siblings_low_usage was to go after them first during reclaim in an
overcommitted subtree:A/memory.low = 2G, memory.current = 4G
A/A1/memory.low = 3G, memory.current = 2G
A/A2/memory.low = 1G, memory.current = 2Gsiblings_low_usage = 2G (only A1 contributes)
A1/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(2G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 2G
A2/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 1GWhile the children combined are overcomitting A and are technically
both at fault, A2 is actively declaring unprotected memory and we
would like to reclaim that first.However, while this sounds like a noble goal on the face of it, it
doesn't make much difference in actual memory distribution: Because A
is overcommitted, reclaim will not stop once A2 gets pushed back to
within its allowance; we'll have to reclaim A1 either way. The end
result is still that protection is distributed proportionally, with A1
getting 3/4 (1.5G) and A2 getting 1/4 (0.5G) of A's allowance.[ If A weren't overcommitted, it wouldn't make a difference since each
cgroup would just get the protection it declares:A/memory.low = 2G, memory.current = 3G
A/A1/memory.low = 1G, memory.current = 1G
A/A2/memory.low = 1G, memory.current = 2GWith the current calculation:
siblings_low_usage = 1G (only A1 contributes)
A1/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(1G) = 2G -> 1G
A2/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(1G) = 2G -> 1GIncluding excess groups in siblings_low_usage:
siblings_low_usage = 2G
A1/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 1G -> 1G
A2/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 1G -> 1G ]Simplify the calculation and fix the proportional reclaim bug by
including excess cgroups in siblings_low_usage.After this patch, the effective memory.low distribution from the
example above would be as follows:A/memory.low = 10G
A/A1/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G
A/A2/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G
A/A3/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 8G
siblings_low_usage = 28GA1/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(28G) = 3.5G
A2/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(28G) = 3.5G
A3/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(8G) / siblings_low_usage(28G) = 2.8GFixes: 1bc63fb1272b ("mm, memcg: make scan aggression always exclude protection")
Fixes: 230671533d64 ("mm: memory.low hierarchical behavior")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Acked-by: Tejun Heo
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin
Acked-by: Chris Down
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Michal Koutný
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227195606.46212-2-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
08 Jun, 2018
3 commits
-
Memory controller implements the memory.low best-effort memory
protection mechanism, which works perfectly in many cases and allows
protecting working sets of important workloads from sudden reclaim.But its semantics has a significant limitation: it works only as long as
there is a supply of reclaimable memory. This makes it pretty useless
against any sort of slow memory leaks or memory usage increases. This
is especially true for swapless systems. If swap is enabled, memory
soft protection effectively postpones problems, allowing a leaking
application to fill all swap area, which makes no sense. The only
effective way to guarantee the memory protection in this case is to
invoke the OOM killer.It's possible to handle this case in userspace by reacting on MEMCG_LOW
events; but there is still a place for a fail-safe in-kernel mechanism
to provide stronger guarantees.This patch introduces the memory.min interface for cgroup v2 memory
controller. It works very similarly to memory.low (sharing the same
hierarchical behavior), except that it's not disabled if there is no
more reclaimable memory in the system.If cgroup is not populated, its memory.min is ignored, because otherwise
even the OOM killer wouldn't be able to reclaim the protected memory,
and the system can stall.[guro@fb.com: s/low/min/ in docs]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180510130758.GA9129@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509180734.GA4856@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin
Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Cc: Tejun Heo
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This patch aims to address an issue in current memory.low semantics,
which makes it hard to use it in a hierarchy, where some leaf memory
cgroups are more valuable than others.For example, there are memcgs A, A/B, A/C, A/D and A/E:
A A/memory.low = 2G, A/memory.current = 6G
//\\
BC DE B/memory.low = 3G B/memory.current = 2G
C/memory.low = 1G C/memory.current = 2G
D/memory.low = 0 D/memory.current = 2G
E/memory.low = 10G E/memory.current = 0If we apply memory pressure, B, C and D are reclaimed at the same pace
while A's usage exceeds 2G. This is obviously wrong, as B's usage is
fully below B's memory.low, and C has 1G of protection as well. Also, A
is pushed to the size, which is less than A's 2G memory.low, which is
also wrong.A simple bash script (provided below) can be used to reproduce
the problem. Current results are:
A: 1430097920
A/B: 711929856
A/C: 717426688
A/D: 741376
A/E: 0To address the issue a concept of effective memory.low is introduced.
Effective memory.low is always equal or less than original memory.low.
In a case, when there is no memory.low overcommittment (and also for
top-level cgroups), these two values are equal.Otherwise it's a part of parent's effective memory.low, calculated as a
cgroup's memory.low usage divided by sum of sibling's memory.low usages
(under memory.low usage I mean the size of actually protected memory:
memory.current if memory.current < memory.low, 0 otherwise). It's
necessary to track the actual usage, because otherwise an empty cgroup
with memory.low set (A/E in my example) will affect actual memory
distribution, which makes no sense. To avoid traversing the cgroup tree
twice, page_counters code is reused.Calculating effective memory.low can be done in the reclaim path, as we
conveniently traversing the cgroup tree from top to bottom and check
memory.low on each level. So, it's a perfect place to calculate
effective memory low and save it to use it for children cgroups.This also eliminates a need to traverse the cgroup tree from bottom to
top each time to check if parent's guarantee is not exceeded.Setting/resetting effective memory.low is intentionally racy, but it's
fine and shouldn't lead to any significant differences in actual memory
distribution.With this patch applied results are matching the expectations:
A: 2147930112
A/B: 1428721664
A/C: 718393344
A/D: 815104
A/E: 0Test script:
#!/bin/bashCGPATH="/sys/fs/cgroup"
truncate /file1 --size 2G
truncate /file2 --size 2G
truncate /file3 --size 2G
truncate /file4 --size 50Gmkdir "${CGPATH}/A"
echo "+memory" > "${CGPATH}/A/cgroup.subtree_control"
mkdir "${CGPATH}/A/B" "${CGPATH}/A/C" "${CGPATH}/A/D" "${CGPATH}/A/E"echo 2G > "${CGPATH}/A/memory.low"
echo 3G > "${CGPATH}/A/B/memory.low"
echo 1G > "${CGPATH}/A/C/memory.low"
echo 0 > "${CGPATH}/A/D/memory.low"
echo 10G > "${CGPATH}/A/E/memory.low"echo $$ > "${CGPATH}/A/B/cgroup.procs" && vmtouch -qt /file1
echo $$ > "${CGPATH}/A/C/cgroup.procs" && vmtouch -qt /file2
echo $$ > "${CGPATH}/A/D/cgroup.procs" && vmtouch -qt /file3
echo $$ > "${CGPATH}/cgroup.procs" && vmtouch -qt /file4echo "A: " `cat "${CGPATH}/A/memory.current"`
echo "A/B: " `cat "${CGPATH}/A/B/memory.current"`
echo "A/C: " `cat "${CGPATH}/A/C/memory.current"`
echo "A/D: " `cat "${CGPATH}/A/D/memory.current"`
echo "A/E: " `cat "${CGPATH}/A/E/memory.current"`rmdir "${CGPATH}/A/B" "${CGPATH}/A/C" "${CGPATH}/A/D" "${CGPATH}/A/E"
rmdir "${CGPATH}/A"
rm /file1 /file2 /file3 /file4Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180405185921.4942-2-guro@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Cc: Tejun Heo
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
This patch renames struct page_counter fields:
count -> usage
limit -> maxand the corresponding functions:
page_counter_limit() -> page_counter_set_max()
mem_cgroup_get_limit() -> mem_cgroup_get_max()
mem_cgroup_resize_limit() -> mem_cgroup_resize_max()
memcg_update_kmem_limit() -> memcg_update_kmem_max()
memcg_update_tcp_limit() -> memcg_update_tcp_max()The idea behind this renaming is to have the direct matching
between memory cgroup knobs (low, high, max) and page_counters API.This is pure renaming, this patch doesn't bring any functional change.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180405185921.4942-1-guro@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Cc: Tejun Heo
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
02 Nov, 2017
1 commit
-
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
06 Nov, 2015
1 commit
-
page_counter_try_charge() currently returns 0 on success and -ENOMEM on
failure, which is surprising behavior given the function name.Make it follow the expected pattern of try_stuff() functions that return a
boolean true to indicate success, or false for failure.Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
12 Feb, 2015
1 commit
-
The unified hierarchy interface for memory cgroups will no longer use "-1"
to mean maximum possible resource value. In preparation for this, make
the string an argument and let the caller supply it.Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: Vladimir Davydov
Cc: Greg Thelen
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds
11 Dec, 2014
2 commits
-
As charges now pin the css explicitely, there is no more need for kmemcg
to acquire a proxy reference for outstanding pages during offlining, or
maintain state to identify such "dead" groups.This was the last user of the uncharge functions' return values, so remove
them as well.Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Davydov
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Tejun Heo
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds -
Memory is internally accounted in bytes, using spinlock-protected 64-bit
counters, even though the smallest accounting delta is a page. The
counter interface is also convoluted and does too many things.Introduce a new lockless word-sized page counter API, then change all
memory accounting over to it. The translation from and to bytes then only
happens when interfacing with userspace.The removed locking overhead is noticable when scaling beyond the per-cpu
charge caches - on a 4-socket machine with 144-threads, the following test
shows the performance differences of 288 memcgs concurrently running a
page fault benchmark:vanilla:
18631648.500498 task-clock (msec) # 140.643 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.33% )
1,380,638 context-switches # 0.074 K/sec ( +- 0.75% )
24,390 cpu-migrations # 0.001 K/sec ( +- 8.44% )
1,843,305,768 page-faults # 0.099 M/sec ( +- 0.00% )
50,134,994,088,218 cycles # 2.691 GHz ( +- 0.33% )
stalled-cycles-frontend
stalled-cycles-backend
8,049,712,224,651 instructions # 0.16 insns per cycle ( +- 0.04% )
1,586,970,584,979 branches # 85.176 M/sec ( +- 0.05% )
1,724,989,949 branch-misses # 0.11% of all branches ( +- 0.48% )132.474343877 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.21% )
lockless:
12195979.037525 task-clock (msec) # 133.480 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.18% )
832,850 context-switches # 0.068 K/sec ( +- 0.54% )
15,624 cpu-migrations # 0.001 K/sec ( +- 10.17% )
1,843,304,774 page-faults # 0.151 M/sec ( +- 0.00% )
32,811,216,801,141 cycles # 2.690 GHz ( +- 0.18% )
stalled-cycles-frontend
stalled-cycles-backend
9,999,265,091,727 instructions # 0.30 insns per cycle ( +- 0.10% )
2,076,759,325,203 branches # 170.282 M/sec ( +- 0.12% )
1,656,917,214 branch-misses # 0.08% of all branches ( +- 0.55% )91.369330729 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.45% )
On top of improved scalability, this also gets rid of the icky long long
types in the very heart of memcg, which is great for 32 bit and also makes
the code a lot more readable.Notable differences between the old and new API:
- res_counter_charge() and res_counter_charge_nofail() become
page_counter_try_charge() and page_counter_charge() resp. to match
the more common kernel naming scheme of try_do()/do()- res_counter_uncharge_until() is only ever used to cancel a local
counter and never to uncharge bigger segments of a hierarchy, so
it's replaced by the simpler page_counter_cancel()- res_counter_set_limit() is replaced by page_counter_limit(), which
expects its callers to serialize against themselves- res_counter_memparse_write_strategy() is replaced by
page_counter_limit(), which rounds down to the nearest page size -
rather than up. This is more reasonable for explicitely requested
hard upper limits.- to keep charging light-weight, page_counter_try_charge() charges
speculatively, only to roll back if the result exceeds the limit.
Because of this, a failing bigger charge can temporarily lock out
smaller charges that would otherwise succeed. The error is bounded
to the difference between the smallest and the biggest possible
charge size, so for memcg, this means that a failing THP charge can
send base page charges into reclaim upto 2MB (4MB) before the limit
would have been reached. This should be acceptable.[akpm@linux-foundation.org: add includes for WARN_ON_ONCE and memparse]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: add includes for WARN_ON_ONCE, memparse, strncmp, and PAGE_SIZE]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov
Cc: Tejun Heo
Cc: David Rientjes
Cc: Stephen Rothwell
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds