15 Nov, 2018

1 commit


09 Oct, 2018

2 commits


26 Sep, 2018

1 commit

  • In the section about Device Trees add a paragraph at the end that
    clarifies how we decide of a tree is valid or not. We say that all
    bindings must either be in the specification (link provided) or in our
    device-tree-bindings directory. We say that most of these come from the
    Linux Kernel and as such some design decisions are made for us already,
    but that in most cases we wish to retain compatibility.

    Cc: Simon Glass
    Cc: Bin Meng
    Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
    Reviewed-by: Simon Glass

    Tom Rini
     

27 Jul, 2018

1 commit


17 Mar, 2017

1 commit

  • Right now the u-boot,dm-pre-reloc flag will make each marked node
    always appear in both spl and tpl. But systems needing an additional
    tpl might have special constraints for each, like the spl needing to
    be very tiny.

    So introduce two additional flags to mark nodes for only spl or tpl
    environments and introduce a function dm_fdt_pre_reloc to automate
    the necessary checks in code instances checking for pre-relocation
    flags.

    The behaviour of the original flag stays untouched and still marks
    a node for both spl and tpl.

    Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner
    Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
    Tested-by: Kever Yang

    Heiko Stübner
     

08 Feb, 2017

1 commit

  • At present devices use a simple integer offset to record the device tree
    node associated with the device. In preparation for supporting a live
    device tree, which uses a node pointer instead, refactor existing code to
    access this field through an inline function.

    Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

    Simon Glass
     

27 May, 2016

1 commit

  • This will allow a driver's bind function to use the driver data. One
    example is the Tegra186 GPIO driver, which instantiates child devices
    for each of its GPIO ports, yet supports two different HW instances each
    with a different set of ports, and identified by the udevice_id .data
    field.

    Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
    Acked-by: Simon Glass

    Stephen Warren
     

15 Apr, 2016

1 commit


22 Jul, 2015

1 commit


23 Apr, 2015

1 commit


30 Jan, 2015

3 commits

  • Now that we have new bus features, update README.txt and the SPI docs to
    explain these.
    Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

    Simon Glass
     
  • At present we try to use the 'reg' property and device tree aliases to give
    devices a sequence number. The 'reg' property is often actually a memory
    address, so the sequence numbers thus-obtained are not useful. It would be
    better if the devices were just sequentially numbered in that case. In fact
    neither I2C nor SPI use this feature, so drop it.

    Some devices need us to look up an alias to number them within the uclass.
    Add a flag to control this, so it is not done unless it is needed.

    Adjust the tests to test this new behaviour.

    Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
    Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada

    Simon Glass
     
  • The root device corresponds to the root device tree node, so set this up.
    Also add a few notes to the documentation.

    Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

    Simon Glass
     

06 Jan, 2015

1 commit


21 Nov, 2014

1 commit


24 Oct, 2014

3 commits


23 Oct, 2014

2 commits


23 Jul, 2014

8 commits

  • Some devices (particularly bus devices) must track their children, knowing
    when a new child is added so that it can be set up for communication on the
    bus.

    Add a child_pre_probe() method to provide this feature, and a corresponding
    child_post_remove() method.

    Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

    Simon Glass
     
  • Some device types can have child devices and want to store information
    about them. For example a USB flash stick attached to a USB host
    controller would likely use this space. The controller can hold
    information about the USB state of each of its children.

    The data is stored attached to the child device in the 'parent_priv'
    member. It can be auto-allocated by dm when the child is probed. To
    do this, add a per_child_auto_alloc_size value to the parent driver.

    Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

    Simon Glass
     
  • Devices can have childen that can be addressed by a simple index, the
    sequence number or a device tree offset. Add functions to access a child
    in each of these ways.

    The index is typically used as a fallback when the sequence number is not
    available. For example we may use a serial UART with sequence number 0 as
    the console, but if no UART has sequence number 0, then we can fall back
    to just using the first UART (index 0).

    The device tree offset function is useful for buses, where they want to
    locate one of their children. The device tree can be scanned to find the
    offset of each child, and that offset can then find the device.

    Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

    Simon Glass
     
  • At present only root nodes in the device tree are scanned for devices.
    But some devices can have children. For example a SPI bus may have
    several children for each of its chip selects.

    Add a function which scans subnodes and binds devices for each one. This
    can be used for the root node scan also, so change it.

    A device can call this function in its bind() or probe() methods to bind
    its children.

    Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

    Simon Glass
     
  • Don't allow access to uclasses before they have been initialised.

    Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

    Simon Glass
     
  • Each device that was bound from a device tree has an node that caused it to
    be bound. Add functions that find and return a device based on a device tree
    offset.

    Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

    Simon Glass
     
  • In U-Boot it is pretty common to number devices from 0 and access them
    on the command line using this numbering. While it may come to pass that
    we will move away from this numbering, the possibility seems remote at
    present.

    Given that devices within a uclass will have an implied numbering, it
    makes sense to build this into driver model as a core feature. The cost
    is fairly small in terms of code and data space.

    With each uclass having numbered devices we can ask for SPI port 0 or
    serial port 1 and receive a single device.

    Devices typically request a sequence number using aliases in the device
    tree. These are resolved when the device is probed, to deal with conflicts.
    Sequence numbers need not be sequential and holes are permitted.

    At present there is no support for sequence numbers using static platform
    data. It could easily be added to 'struct driver_info' if needed, but it
    seems better to add features as we find a use for them, and the use of -1
    to mean 'no sequence' makes the default value somewhat painful.

    Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

    Simon Glass
     
  • Driver model currently only operates after relocation is complete. In this
    state U-Boot typically has a small amount of memory available. In adding
    support for driver model prior to relocation we must try to use as little
    memory as possible.

    In addition, on some machines the memory has not be inited and/or the CPU
    is not running at full speed or the data cache is off. These can reduce
    execution performance, so the less initialisation that is done before
    relocation the better.

    An immediately-obvious improvement is to only initialise drivers which are
    actually going to be used before relocation. On many boards the only such
    driver is a serial UART, so this provides a very large potential benefit.

    Allow drivers to mark themselves as 'pre-reloc' which means that they will
    be initialised prior to relocation. This can be done either with a driver
    flag or with a 'dm,pre-reloc' device tree property.

    To support this, the various dm scanning function now take a 'pre_reloc_only'
    parameter which indicates that only drivers marked pre-reloc should be
    bound.

    Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

    Simon Glass
     

21 Jun, 2014

2 commits


12 Jun, 2014

1 commit


27 May, 2014

1 commit

  • using UBI and DM together leads in compiler error, as
    both define a "struct device", so rename "struct device"
    in include/dm/device.h to "struct udevice", as we use
    linux code (MTD/UBI/UBIFS some USB code,...) and cannot
    change the linux "struct device"

    Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
    Cc: Simon Glass
    Cc: Marek Vasut

    Heiko Schocher
     

05 Mar, 2014

1 commit